Abstract
Purpose The gradual return to work (GRTW) of injured workers poses numerous challenges for workplaces. The aim of this study was to provide employers with an adapted tool to support them in managing GRTWs following a musculoskeletal disorder (MSD), by adapting the Guide for estimation of margin of manoeuvre (Durand et al. in 7th international scientific conference on prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, 2010) and then evaluating the acceptability of the adapted version. Methods A mixed methods design was used. Content experts were surveyed about the content and form of a first version of the adapted tool. Proposed modifications were then discussed in a group meeting until consensus was reached on the changes to be made. The acceptability of the new version was determined by conducting semi-structured interviews of potential users. A thematic analysis of the verbatim transcript was performed. Results Nine experts reached a consensus on 20 modifications, which yielded a tool comprising an instruction guide and a planning worksheet. The eight companies consulted found the tool acceptable, useful, and pertinent, but also identified a few changes to be made. Conclusion The use of original methods made it possible to adapt the content of the tool while taking evidence-based data and user needs into account, all of which contributed to its acceptance. The tool will support employers and standardize management of GRTWs following MSD-related sick leaves. Possible avenues for future research emerged from this study: evaluate the acceptability of new formats and a transdiagnostic version of the tool, and consult workers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The guide is an unpublished document.
The term “return-to-work coordinator” (RTW coordinator) is used here to refer to the individuals who carry out part or all of the task of coordinating the RTW. These individuals generally fall under a company’s HR department or health office.
References
Loisel P, Anema JR. Handbook of work disability prevention and management. New York: Springer; 2013.
van den Heuvel S, van der Zwaan L, van Dam L, Oude Hengel K, Eekhout I, van Emmerik M, Oldenburg C, Brück C, Janowski P. Wilhelm C. Estimating the costs of work-related accidents and ill-health: an analysis of European data sources. Luxembourg: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA); 2017.
OECD. Sickness. Disability and Work: Breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2010.
Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(9):646–656.
Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil. 1998;8(2):113–139.
Kosny A, Brijnath B, Singh N, Allen A, Collie A, Ruseckaite R, Mazza D, Grad D. Uncomfortable bedfellows: employer perspectives on general practitioners’role in the return-to-work process. Policy Pract Health Saf. 2015;13(1):65–76.
MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche R-L, Irvin E, The Workplace-based Return to Work Literature Review Group. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–269.
Taylor K, Daniel J. Musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace: The role of HR and line managers. Occup Health. 2015;67(3):18–19.
Durand M-J, Nastasia L, Coutu M-F, Bernier M. Practices of return-to-work coordinators working in large organizations. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(1):137–147.
Coole C, Watson PJ, Drummond A. Low back pain patients’ experiences of work modifications; a qualitative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11(277):1–10.
Durand M-J, Corbière M, Coutu M-F, Reinharz D, Albert V. A review of best work-absence management and return-to-work practices for workers with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders. Work. 2014;48(4):579–589.
Durand M-J, Vézina N, Loisel P, Richard M-C. Developing a guide for measuring the concept of margin of manoeuvre. In 7th international scientific conference on prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (PREMUS). 2010. Angers (France).
Durand M-J, Vézina N, Baril R, Loisel P, Richard M-C, Ngomo S. La marge de manoeuvre de travailleurs pendant et après un programme de retour progressif au travail - Définitions et relations avec le retour à l'emploi (Workers’ margin of manoeuvre during and after a gradual-return-to-work program—definitions and relationship to the return to work). Montréal: Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail; 2008.
Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(5):452–457.
Contandriopoulos A-P, Bélanger L, Nguyen H. Savoir préparer une recherche: La définir, la structurer, la financer (Knowing how to prepare for a study: defining, structuring and funding it). Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal; 1990.
Creswell JW. A framework for design. In: Creswell JW, editor. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oak: SAGE; 2003. pp. 3–26.
Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2010.
Bouffard J. Outiller les employeurs dans la gestion du retour progressif au travail de personnes présentant un trouble musculosquelettique: Adaptation du guide d’évaluation de la marge de manœuvre (Adaptation of a guide to equip employers to manage the gradual return to work of individuals with a musculoskeletal disorder). Master’s thesis. Université de Sherbrooke; 2018.
Albert V, Durand M-J, Pepin G. TRIAGE - Une technique structurée sollicitant l’opinion d’experts en vue d’atteindre un consensus (TRIAGE—A structured technique for collecting expert’s opinions and obtaining consensus). In: Corbière M, Larivière N, editors. Méthodes qualitatives, quantitatives et mixtes dans la recherche en sciences humaines, sociales et de la santé (Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods in humanities, social sciences and health research). Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2014. pp. 305–325.
Gervais M, Pépin G, Carrière M. TRIAGE ou comment adapter une technique de recherche à l’intervention clinique en ergothérapie (TRIAGE or how to adapt a research technique to clinical interventions in occupational therapy). Revue québécoise d’ergothérapie. 2000;9:11–15.
Fortin M-F, Gagnon J. Fondements et étapes du processus de recherche (Foundations and stages of the research process). 2nd ed. Montréal: Chenelière Éducation; 2010.
Coutu M-F, Légaré F, Durand M-J, Corbière M, Dawn S, Bainbridge L, Labrecque M-É. Operationalizing a shared decision making model for work rehabilitation programs: a consensus process. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):141–152.
Carifio J, Perla R. Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Med Educ. 2008;42(12):1150–1152.
Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the ‘‘laws’’ of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2010;15(5):625–632.
Burgers JS, Grol RPTM, Zaat JOM, Spies TH, van der Bij AK, Mokkink HGA. Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53(486):15–19.
Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ. 1998;317(7162):858–861.
Hayward RSA, Guyatt GH, Moore K-A, McKibbon A, Carter AO. Canadian physicians’ attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc. 1997;156(12):1715–1723.
Hibble A, Kanka D, Pencheon D, Poole F. Guidelines in general practice: the new Tower of Babel ? BMJ. 1998;317(7162):862–863.
Carlsen B, Kjellberg PK. Guidelines; from foe to friend? Comparative interviews with GPs in Norway and Denmark. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(17):1–8.
Lilian N. L’analyse de contenu dans l’étude des représentations sociales (Content analysis in the study of social representations). Sociologies; 2006; 1–13.
Muhr T. ATLAS/ti—A prototype for the support of text interpretation. Qualitative Sociol. 1991;14(4):349–371.
Vézina M, Cloutier E, Stock S, Lippel K, Fortin É, Delisle A, et al. Enquête québécoise sur des conditions de travail, d’emploi et de santé et de sécurité du travail (Quebec survey on working and employment conditions and occupational health and safety) (EQCOTESST). Montréal: Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail; 2011.
Lortie M, Faye C, Laroche E, Desmarais L, Denis D, Nastasia I, et al. Bilan des études sur les guides de pratique en santé: qu’en retirer pour la santé et la sécurité au travail (Review of studies on health practice guidelines: what can be learned for occupational health and safety). Perspect Interdiscip Trav Santé. 2013; 15(1): 1–20.
Durand M-J, Vézina N, Baril R, Loisel P, Richard M-C, Ngomo S. Margin of manoeuvre indicators in the workplace during the rehabilitation process: a qualitative analysis. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(2):194–202.
Faye C, Lortie M, Desmarais L. Guide sur le transfert des connaissances à l’intention des chercheurs en santé et sécurité du travail (Knowledge transfer guide for occupational health and safety researchers). Montréal, Québec. Canada: Réseau de recherche en santé et en sécurité du travail du Québec; 2007.
McGuire C, Kristman VL, Shaw W, Williams-Whitt K, Reguly P, Soklaridis S. Supervisor autonomy and considerate leadership style are associated with supervisors’ likelihood to accommodate back injured workers. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(3):589–598.
Nordqvist C, Holmqvist C, Alexanderson K. Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(1):11–20.
James C, Southgate E, Kable A, Rivett DA, Guest M, Bohatko-Naismith J. The return-to-work coordinator role: Qualitative insights for nursing. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):220–227.
Nastasia I, Coutu M-F, Cibotaru A. Prévention de l'incapacité prolongée chez les travailleurs indemnisés pour troubles musculo-squelettiques. Une revue systématique de la littérature. (Prevention of prolonged disability in workers compensated for musculoskeletal disorder. A systematic review of the literature). Montréal: Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail; 2013.
Winter J, Issa MH, Quaigrain R, Dick K, Regehr JD. Evaluating disability management in the Manitoban construction industry for injured workers returning to the workplace with a disability. Can J Civ Eng. 2016;43(2):109–117.
Cancelliere C, Donovan J, Stochkendahl MJ, Biscardi M, Ammendolia C, Myburgh C, Cassidy JD. Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24(32):1–23.
Shaw W, Hong Q-N, Pransky G, Loisel P. A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):2–15.
Carlsen B, Glenton C, Pope C. Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: a meta-synthesis of GPs’ attitudes to clinical practice guidelines. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(545):971–978.
Shekelle PG, Kravitz RL, Beart J, Marger M, Wang M, Lee M. Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making. Health Serv Res. 2000;34(7):1429–1448.
Lortie M, Desmarais L, Faye C, Laroche E, Faurie I. Le transfert de connaissances au RRSSTQ: bilan et perspectives (The transfer of knowledge in the RRSSTQ (Quebec occupational health and safety research network): assessment and prospects). Relat Ind. 2013;68(4):567–589.
Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Shekelle P, Schünemann HJ, Woolf S. Developing clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and conflicts of interest. Implement Sci. 2012;7(60):1–8.
Corbière M, Negiri A, Durand M-J, St-Arnaud L, Briand C, Fassier J-B, et al. Development of the Return-to-work Obstacles and Self-Efficacy Scale (ROSES) and validation with workers suffering from a common mental disorder or musculoskeletal disorder. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(3):329–341.
Rogers EM. Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addict Behav. 2002;27(6):989–993.
Acknowledgements
The principal author wishes to express her gratitude to the Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST) for awarding her a master’s degree scholarship that enabled her to conduct this study, and to the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé and the Research Chair in Work Rehabilitation (J. Armand Bombardier ― Pratt & Whitney Canada), for both their financial support in the form of a study scholarship and their logistical support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Julie Bouffard, Marie-José Durand, and Marie-France Coutu declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Research Ethics Committee of the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants for their inclusion in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bouffard, J., Durand, MJ. & Coutu, MF. Adaptation of a Guide to Equip Employers to Manage the Gradual Return to Work of Individuals with a Musculoskeletal Disorder. J Occup Rehabil 29, 625–635 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-019-09827-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-019-09827-4