Skip to main content
Log in

Virtual Reality for the Management of Pain and Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Randomized Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Virtual Reality Headset (VRH) is a device aiming at improving patient’s comfort by reducing pain and anxiety during medical interventions. Its interest during cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implant procedures has not been studied.

Methods

We randomized consecutive patients admitted for pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) at our center to either standard analgesia care (STD-Group), or to VRH (VRH-Group). Patients in the STD-Group received intra-venous paracetamol (1 g) 60 min before the procedure, and local anesthesia was performed with lidocaine. For patients of the VRH-Group, VRH was used on top of standard care. We monitored patients’ pain and anxiety using numeric rating scales (from 0 to 10) at the time of sub-cutaneous pocket creation, and during deep axillary vein puncture. Patient comfort during the procedure was assessed using a detailed questionnaire. Morphine consumption was also assessed.

Results

We randomized 61 patients to STD-Group (n = 31) or VRH-Group (n = 30). Pain and anxiety were lower in the VRH-Group during deep venous puncture (3.0 ± 2.0 vs. 4.8 ± 2.2, p = 0.002 and 2.4 ± 2.2 vs. 4.1 ± 2.4, p = 0.006) but not during pocket creation (p = 0.58 and p = 0.5). Morphine consumption was lower in the VRH-Group (1.6 ± 0.7 vs. 2.1 ± 1.1 mg; p = 0.041). Patients’ overall comfort during procedure was similar in both groups.

Conclusion

VRH use improved pain and anxiety control during deep venous puncture compared to standard analgesia care, and allowed morphine consumption reduction. However, pain and anxiety were similar at the time of sub-cutaneous pocket creation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Banks H, Torbica A, Valzania C, Varabyova Y, Prevolnik Rupel V, Taylor RS, Hunger T, Walker S, Boriani G, Fattore G. Five year trends (2008–2012) in cardiac implantable electrical device utilization in five european nations: A case study in cross-country comparisons using administrative databases. Europace. 2018;20:643–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Li A, Montaño Z, Chen VJ, Gold JI. Virtual reality and pain management: Current trends and future directions. Pain management. 2011;1:147–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hitching R, Hoffman HG, Garcia-Palacios A, Adamson MM, Madrigal E, Alhalabi W, Alhudali A, Sampaio M, Peterson B, Fontenot MR, Mason KP. The emerging role of virtual reality as an adjunct to procedural sedation and anesthesia: A narrative review. Journal of clinical medicine. 2023;12

  4. Indovina P, Barone D, Gallo L, Chirico A, De Pietro G, Giordano A. Virtual reality as a distraction intervention to relieve pain and distress during medical procedures: A comprehensive literature review. The Clinical journal of pain. 2018;34:858–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruno RR, Lin Y, Wolff G, Polzin A, Veulemans V, Klein K, Westenfeld R, Zeus T, Kelm M, Jung C. Virtual reality-assisted conscious sedation during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A randomised pilot study. EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2020;16:e1014-e1020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roxburgh T, Li A, Guenancia C, Pernollet P, Bouleti C, Alos B, Gras M, Kerforne T, Frasca D, Le Gal F, Christiaens L, Degand B, Garcia R. Virtual reality for sedation during atrial fibrillation ablation in clinical practice: Observational study. Journal of medical Internet research. 2021;23:e26349

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Jung C, Wolff G, Wernly B, Bruno RR, Franz M, Schulze PC, Silva JNA, Silva JR, Bhatt DL, Kelm M. Virtual and augmented reality in cardiovascular care: State-of-the-art and future perspectives. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15:519–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hermans ANL, Betz K, Verhaert DVM, den Uijl DW, Clerx K, Debie L, Lahaije M, Vernooy K, Linz D, Weijs B. 360° virtual reality to improve patient education and reduce anxiety towards atrial fibrillation ablation. Europace. 2023;25:855–862

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pereira PJS, Lerner EA. Gate control theory springs a leak. Neuron. 2017;93:723–724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lind A, Ahsan M, Totzeck M, Al-Rashid F, Haddad A, Dubler S, Brenner T, Skarabis A, El Gabry M, Rassaf T, Jánosi RA. Virtual reality-assisted distraction during transcatheter aortic valve implantation under local anaesthesia: A randomised study. Int J Cardiol. 2023;387:131130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith V, Warty RR, Sursas JA, Payne O, Nair A, Krishnan S, da Silva Costa F, Wallace EM, Vollenhoven B. The effectiveness of virtual reality in managing acute pain and anxiety for medical inpatients: Systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research. 2020;22:e17980

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Weech S, Kenny S, Barnett-Cowan M. Presence and cybersickness in virtual reality are negatively related: A review. Frontiers in psychology. 2019;10:158

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F.S and J.B : design, conception. F.S: drafting of the manuscript. F.S, J.B, D.S, S.B : data acquisition, analysis, interpretation. P.M and E.F: interpretation, revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabien Squara.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All patients gave informed consent to participate, and IRB approval was obtained. Study was registered to the ANSM under the ID: RCB 2023-A02481-44.

Conflict of Interest

None for all authors.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Squara, F., Bateau, J., Scarlatti, D. et al. Virtual Reality for the Management of Pain and Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Randomized Study. J Med Syst 48, 28 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02039-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02039-1

Keywords

Navigation