Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Maternal Age on the Foreign-Born Paradox

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To examine the effect of maternal age on the risk of preterm birth and its phenotypes in foreign-born compared to native-born mothers. The 2014–2017 US Birth and Fetal Death data were analyzed (N = 14,867,880). Log-binomial regression models were used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (APR), quantifying the association between mother’s nativity and preterm birth and its phenotypes, stratified by maternal age. Foreign-born mothers had a 13% lower probability of preterm birth compared to their native-born counterparts (APR, 0.87 [95% CI 0.86–0.87]). This protective effect persisted across all preterm phenotypes. Stratification by maternal age showed a slightly elevated risk in preterm and moderate-to-late preterm for adolescent mothers. Our study supports the existence of the “foreign-born paradox” whereby foreign-born mothers experienced lower levels of preterm birth despite the disadvantages of living in an alien socio-cultural environment. This favorable birth outcome was present primarily in foreign-born mothers aged ≥ 20 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Migration Policy Institute. US Immigrant population and share over time, 1850-present. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/charts/immigrant-population-over-time. Accessed 6 June 2020.

  2. International Organization for Migration (IOM). World migration report 2020. https://publications.iom.int/books/world-migration-report-2020. Accessed 6 June 2020.

  3. Almeida LM, Caldas J, Ayres-de-Campos D, Salcedo-Barrientos D, Dias S. Maternal healthcare in migrants: a systematic review. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(8):1346–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van den Akker T, Van Roosmalen J. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity in a migration perspective. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;32:26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Salihu HM, Mardenbrough-Gumbs WS, Aliyu MH, Sedjro JE, Pierre-Louis BJ, Kirby RS, et al. Influence of nativity on neonatal survival of Black twins in the United States. Ethn Dis. 2005;15(2):276–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wartko PD, Wong EY, Enquobahrie DA. Maternal birthplace is associated with low birth weight within racial/ethnic groups. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(6):1358–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Salemi JL, Pierre M, Tanner JP, Kornosky JL, Hauser KW, Kirby RS, et al. Maternal nativity as a risk factor for gastroschisis: a population-based study. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009;85(11):890–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim S, Choi S, Chung-Do JJ, Fan VY. Comparing birth outcomes in Hawai’i between US- and Foreign-born women. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2018;77(8):188–98.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ichou M, Wallace M. The healthy immigrant effect: the role of educational selectivity in the good health of migrants. Dem Res. 2019;40(4):61–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamilton TG. The healthy immigrant (migrant) effect: in search of a better native-born comparison group. Soc Sci Res. 2015;54:353–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pinheiro RL, Areia AL, Mota Pinto A, Donato H. Advanced maternal age: adverse outcomes of pregnancy, a meta-analysis. Acta Med Port. 2019;32(3):219–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kleinman JC, Fingerhut LA, Prager K. Differences in infant mortality by race, nativity status, and other maternal characteristics. Am J Dis Child. 1991;145(2):194–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lisonkova S, Potts J, Muraca GM, et al. Maternal age and severe maternal morbidity: a population-based retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(5):e1002307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zaki MN, Hibbard JU, Kominiarek MA. Contemporary labor patterns and maternal age. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1018–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ikedionwu CA, Dongarwar D, Yusuf KK, Ibrahimi S, Salinas-Miranda AA, Salihu HM. Pre-pregnancy maternal obesity, macrosomia, and risk of stillbirth: a population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;252:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Birth settings in america: outcomes, quality, access, and choice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dongarwar D, Aggarwal A, Barning K, Salihu HM. Trends in stillbirths and stillbirth phenotypes in the united states: an analysis of 131.5 million births. Int J Matern Child Heal AIDS. 2020;9(1):146–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gibbs CM, Wendt A, Peters S, Hogue CJ. The impact of early age at first childbirth on maternal and infant health. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26(1):259–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kenny LC, Lavender T, McNamee R, O’Neill SM, Mills T, Khashan AS. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: evidence from a large contemporary cohort. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e56583.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lean SC, Derricott H, Jones RL, Heazell AEP. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0186287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khalil A, Syngelaki A, Maiz N, Zinevich Y, Nicolaides KH. Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(6):634–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Salihu HM, Shumpert MN, Slay M, Kirby RS, Alexander GR. Childbearing beyond maternal age 50 and fetal outcomes in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(5 Pt 1):1006–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carolan M, Frankowska D. Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome: a review of the evidence. Midwifery. 2011;27:793–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Malabarey OT, Balayla J, Klam SL, Shrim A, Abenhaim HA. Pregnancies in young adolescent mothers: a population-based study on 37 million births. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012;25:98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eure CR, Lindsay MK, Graves WL. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in young adolescent parturients in an inner-city hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Korede K. Yusuf.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yusuf, K.K., Dongarwar, D., Maiyegun, S.O. et al. Impact of Maternal Age on the Foreign-Born Paradox. J Immigrant Minority Health 23, 1198–1205 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-021-01157-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-021-01157-z

Keywords

Navigation