Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Breastfeeding or Bottled Milk? Poverty and Feeding Choices in the Native and Immigrant Population in Belgium

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many European countries, mothers in poverty show a preference for bottled milk over breastfeeding. What remains unknown is whether the impact of poverty on feeding choices differs between immigrants and natives. We first assessed whether being born into poverty indicates a higher chance of being bottle-fed, then evaluated whether region of origin of the mother moderates the impact of poverty on feeding choice. Based on population data from nearly all newborns in Belgium in 2004 (N = 34,314), we performed several binary logistic analyses to answer these research questions. Analyses showed a strong difference in feeding choices between native and migrant mothers in poverty: for Belgian mothers, the choice to breastfeed significantly decreased; no such effect was observed for migrant women. Southern European mothers living in poverty have an even higher chance of breastfeeding than those who are better off. We suggest possible explanations and set a direction for future research regarding breastfeeding choices for migrant mothers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To warrant our decision to analyze Turkish and Moroccan migrant groups together, additional tests were performed. Pearson χ2 shows these two groups are statistically non-significant from each other (Pearson χ2 = 3.381, p < 0.066). An analysis of Turkish and Moroccan migrants, each as separate categories, further confirms our decision (Turkish migrants: OR 1.635, p < .000; Moroccan migrants: OR 1.389, p < .000; poor Turkish migrants: OR 3.234, p < .000; poor Moroccan migrants: OR 1.584, p < .000).

References

  1. de Jager M, Hartley K, Terrazas J, Merrill J. Barriers to breastfeeding—a global survey on why women start and stop breastfeeding. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;7(Suppl. 1):25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dykes F, Hall-Moran V. Infant and young child feeding: challenges to implementing a global strategy. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McFadden A, Toole G. Exploring women’s views of breastfeeding: a focus group study within an area with high levels of socio-economic deprivation. Matern Child Nutr. 2006;2(3):156–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey C, Pain R. Geographies of infant feeding and access to primary health care. Health Soc Care Community. 2001;9(5):309–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Raffle H, Ware LJ, Borcharat AR, Strickland HA. Factors that influence breastfeeding initiation and persistence in Ohio’s Appalachian region. Athens: Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs at Ohio University; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buvinic M. Women and nutrition: nutrition policy discussion—feminization of poverty. ASS/SCN; 1990. http://www.unsystem.org/SCN/archives/npp06/begin.htm#Contents.

  7. Geerts A, Dierckx D, Vandevoort L. Elk kind telt: informatie en inspiratie voor lokale actoren in hun strijd tegen armoede. Brussels: Vlaamse overheid: Departement Welzijn, Volksgezondheid en Gezin; 2012.

  8. Macadam S, Dettwyler KA. Breastfeeding: biocultural perspectives. New York: Transaction Publishers; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sussner KM, Lindsay AC, Peterson KE. The influence of acculturation on breast-feeding initiation and duration in low-income women in the US. J Biosoc Sci. 2008;40:673–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kocturk T, Zetterström R. The promotion of breastfeeding and maternal attitudes. Acta Paeditr. 1989;78(6):817–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dowling DA. Lessons from the past: a brief history of the influence of social, economic, and scientific factors on infant feeding. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2005;5(1):2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Michaelsen KF, Larsen PS, Thomsen BL, Samuelson G. The Copenhagen Cohort Study on infant nutrition and growth: duration of breastfeeding and influencing factors. Acta Paediatr. 1994;83(6):565–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Griffiths LJ, Tate AR, Dezateux C. The contribution of parental and community ethnicity to breastfeeding practices: evidence from the Millennium Cohort Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(6):1378–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nicoll A, Thayaparan B, Newell M, Rundall P. Breast feeding policy, promotion and practice in Europe. Results of a survey with non-governmental organizations. J Nutr Environ Med. 2002;12(3):255–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Szelewa D, Polakowski MP. Who cares? Changing patterns of childcare in Central and Eastern Europe. J Eur Soc Pol. 2008;18(2):115–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Riva E, Banderali G, Agostoni C, Silano M, Radaelli G, Giovannini M. Factors associated with the initiation and duration of breastfeeding. Acta Paeditr. 1999;88(4):411–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Colodro-Conde L, Sánchez-Romera JF, Tornero-Gómez MJ, Pérez-Riquelme F, Polo-Tomás M, Ordoñana JR. Relationship between level of education and breastfeeding duration depends on social context: breastfeeding trends over a 40-year period in Spain. J Hum Lact. 2011;27(3):272–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaikh U, Ahmed O. Islam and infant feeding. Breastfeed Med. 2006;1(3):164–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leffler D. U.S. high school age girls may be receptive to breastfeeding promotion. J Hum Lact. 2000;16(1):36–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gibson MV, Diaz VA, Mainous AG, Geesey ME. Prevalence of breastfeeding and acculturation in Hispanics: results from NHANES 1999–2000 study. Birth. 2005;32(2):93–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eggermont R. Gemeentelijke kindrapporten: beschrijving van de tabellen. Kind en Gezin; 2009. http://www.kindengezin.be/img/gkr-tekst-uitleg.pdf.

  22. Alliet P, Arts W, De Greef E, Hauser B, Hoffman I, Mahler T, Stevens G, Vandenplas Y, Van De Vijver, Van Winckel M: Richtlijnen over borstvoeding en kunstvoeding voor zuigelingen van 0 tot 12 maanden. Werkgroep Voeding van de Vlaamse Vereniging Kindergeneeskunde; 2012.

  23. Guérin C, Roelants M, Van Leeuwen K, Desoete A, Hoppenbrouwers K: Sociaal-demografisch profiel, perinatale gezondheid en gezondheid tijdens de eerste levenweken van de Vlaamse geboortecohorte JOnG! Steunpunt Welzijn, Volksgezondheid en Gezin; 2011.

  24. United Nation Statistics Division. Composition of macro geographical (continental) regions, geographical sub-regions, and selected economic and other grouping; 2009. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm.

  25. Dubois L, Girard M. Social determinants of initiation, duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding at the population level—the results of the longitudinal study of child development in Quebec (ELDEQ 1998–2002). Can J Public Health. 2003;94(4):300–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hill PA, Johnson TS. Assessment of breastfeeding and infant growth. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007;52(6):571–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Henderson L, Kitzinger J, Green J. Representing infant feeding: content analysis of British media portrayals of bottle feeding and breast feeding. BMJ. 2000;321(7270):1196–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cattaneo A, Yngve A, Koletzko B, Guzman LR. Protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding in Europe: current situation. Pub Health Nutr. 2005;8(1):39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Raj VK, Plichta SB. The role of social support in breastfeeding promotion: a literature review. J Hum Lact. 1998;14(1):41–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hawkins SS, Lamb K, Cole TJ, Law C. Influence of moving to the UK on maternal health behaviors: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2008;336(7652):1052–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Harley K, Stamm NL, Eskenazi B. The effect of time in the U.S. on the duration of breastfeeding in women of Mexican descent. Matern Child Health J. 2007;11(2):119–25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kimbro RT, Lynch SM, McLanahan S. The influence of acculturation on breastfeeding initiation and duration for Mexican-Americans. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2008;27:183–99.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wiemann CM, Dubois JC, Berenson AB. Racial/ethnic differences in the decision to breastfeed among adolescent mothers. Pediatrics. 1998;101(6). http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/101/6/e11.full.pdf+html.

  34. Río I, Castelló-Pastor A, del Val Sandín-Vásquez M, Barona C, Jané M, Más R, Rebagliato M, Bolúmar F. Breastfeeding initiation in immigrant and non-immigrant women in Spain. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011;65:1345–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Vanderlinden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vanderlinden, K., Levecque, K. & Van Rossem, R. Breastfeeding or Bottled Milk? Poverty and Feeding Choices in the Native and Immigrant Population in Belgium. J Immigrant Minority Health 17, 319–324 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-014-0072-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-014-0072-1

Keywords

Navigation