Abstract
Video-game loot boxes are a popular form of microtransaction that have been widely criticized for their structural similarities to gambling. Recent research linking loot box expenditure to gambling activity has illuminated potential harms associated with loot box use. However, whether the harms differ between earning loot boxes through gameplay versus acquiring loot boxes through purchasing remains understudied. This pre-registered study explores gambling, gaming and loot box-related harms between loot box purchasers and earners in the scope of the game Overwatch. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess loot box-related harms in a single game. We found that loot box purchasers experienced greater video-game related expenditure harms, risky loot box use, impulsivity related to planning and reward reactivity in comparison to loot box earners. Surprisingly, Overwatch loot box earners displayed greater gambling-related harms and there were no differences in general problem video-gaming between the two groups. Our results suggest that the relationship between loot box purchasing and gambling is in need of refined examination. Particularly, our results indicate that potential harms stemming from loot box engagement should be assessed on a game-by-game basis in order to better understand the potentially problematic nature of loot box use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antons, S., Brand, M., & Potenza, M. N. (2020). Neurobiology of cue-reactivity, craving, and inhibitory control in non-substance addictive behaviors. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 415, 116952.
Alessi, S. M., & Petry, N. M. (2003). Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure. Behavioural Processes, 64(3), 345–354.
Baudinet, J., & Blaszczynski, A. (2013). Arousal and gambling mode preference: A review of the literature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(2), 343–358.
Benson, L. A., Norman, C., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). The role of impulsivity, sensation seeking, coping, and year of study in student gambling: A pilot study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 10(4), 461–473.
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2003). Parsing reward. Trends in Neurosciences, 26(9), 507–513.
Bijleveld, E., Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2012). Adaptive reward pursuit: How effort requirements affect unconscious reward responses and conscious reward decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 728.
Brooks, G. A., & Clark, L. (2019). Associations between loot box use, problematic gaming and gambling, and gambling-related cognitions. Addictive Behaviors, 96, 26–34.
Charlton, J. P., & Danforth, I. D. W. (2007). Distinguishing addiction and high engagement in the context of online game playing. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23, 1531–1548.
Delfabbro, P., & King, D. L. (2020). Gaming-gambling convergence: evaluating evidence for the ‘gateway’ hypothesis. International Gambling Studies, 14, 1–13.
Dixon, M. J., MacLaren, V., Jarick, M., Fugelsang, J. A., & Harrigan, K. A. (2013). The frustrating effects of just missing the jackpot: Slot machine near-misses trigger large skin conductance responses, but no post-reinforcement pauses. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(4), 661–674.
Drummond, A., Sauer, J. D., Ferguson, C. J., & Hall, L. C. (2020). The relationship between problem gambling, excessive gaming, psychological distress and spending on loot boxes in Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, and the United States: A cross-national survey. PLoS ONE, 15(3), e0230378.
Drummond, A., & Sauer, J. D. (2018). Video game loot boxes are psychologically akin to gambling. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(8), 530–532.
Ferris, J. A., & Wynne, H. J. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index (pp. 1–59). Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
Gullo, M. J., & Potenza, M. N. (2014). Impulsivity: mechanisms, moderators and implications for addictive behaviors. Addictive Behaviors, 39(11), 1543–1546.
Hernandez Lallement, J., Kuss, K., Trautner, P., Weber, B., Falk, A., & Fliessbach, K. (2014). Effort increases sensitivity to reward and loss magnitude in the human brain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(3), 342–349.
Hodgins, D. C., & Holub, A. (2015). Components of impulsivity in gambling disorder. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 13(6), 699–711.
Inzlicht, M., Shenhav, A., & Olivola, C. Y. (2018). The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(4), 337–349.
Johnson, A. W., & Gallagher, M. (2011). Greater effort boosts the affective taste properties of food. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1711), 1450–1456.
King, D. L., Ejova, A., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2012). Illusory control, gambling, and video gaming: An investigation of regular gamblers and video game players. Journal of gambling studies, 28(3), 421–435.
Larche, C. J., Chini, K., Lee, C., Dixon, M. J., & Fernandes, M. (2019). Rare loot box rewards trigger larger arousal and reward responses, and greater urge to open more loot boxes. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 1–23.
Li, W., Mills, D., & Nower, L. (2019). The relationship of loot box purchases to problem video gaming and problem gambling. Addictive Behaviors, 97, 27–34.
Ma, Q., Meng, L., Wang, L., & Shen, Q. (2014). I endeavor to make it: Effort increases valuation of subsequent monetary reward. Behavioural Brain Research, 261, 1–7.
Macey, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). eSports, skins and loot boxes: Participants, practices and problematic behaviour associated with emergent forms of gambling. New Media & Society, 21(1), 20–41.
Madden, G. J., Ewan, E. E., & Lagorio, C. H. (2007). Toward an animal model of gambling: Delay discounting and the allure of unpredictable outcomes. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(1), 63–83.
McMullen, M. N., Markman, K. D., & Gavanski, I. (1995). Living in neither the best nor worst of all possible worlds: Antecedents and consequences of upward and downward counterfactual thinking. What Might Have Been: the Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking, 85, 133–167.
Metcalf, O., & Pammer, K. (2014). Impulsivity and related neuropsychological features in regular and addictive first person shooter gaming. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(3), 147–152.
Mochon, D., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2012). Bolstering and restoring feelings of competence via the IKEA effect. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 363–369.
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1990). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge University Press.
Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Outcome controllability and counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), 620–628.
Tejeiro Salguero, R. A., & Morán, R. M. B. (2002). Measuring problem video game playing in adolescents. Addiction, 97(12), 1601–1606.
Wulfert, E., Harris, K., & Broussard, J. (2016). The role of cross-cue reactivity in coexisting smoking and gambling habits. Journal of Gambling Issues, 32, 28–43.
Wulfert, E., Maxson, J., & Jardin, B. (2009). Cue-specific reactivity in experienced gamblers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(4), 731.
Wynne, H. J. (2002). Gambling and problem gambling in Saskatchewan. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
Xiao, L. Y. (2020). Which implementations of loot boxes constitute gambling? A UK legal perspective on the potential harms of random reward mechanisms. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1–18.
Yi, W., Mei, S., Zhang, M., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Decomposing the effort paradox in reward processing: Time matters. Neuropsychologia, 137, 107311.
Zendle, D., Cairns, P., Barnett, H., & McCall, C. (2020). Paying for loot boxes is linked to problem gambling, regardless of specific features like cash-out and pay-to-win. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 181–191.
Zendle, D., Meyer, R., & Over, H. (2019). Adolescents and loot boxes: Links with problem gambling and motivations for purchase. Royal Society Open Science, 6(6), 190049.
Zendle, D., & Cairns, P. (2018). Video game loot boxes are linked to problem gambling: Results of a large-scale survey. PLoS ONE, 13(11), e0206767.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada through research Grants to M.J.D. We would also like to thank our research assistant Tenaaz Irani for her help in developing the figures for this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Larche, C.J., Chini, K., Lee, C. et al. To Pay or Just Play? Examining Individual Differences Between Purchasers and Earners of Loot Boxes in Overwatch. J Gambl Stud 39, 625–643 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-022-10127-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-022-10127-5