Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Appointment Waiting Time on Attendance Rates at a Clinical Cancer Genetics Service

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

The increase in demand for clinical cancer genetics services has impacted the ability to provide services timeously. Given limited resources, this often results in extended appointment waiting times. Over the last 3 years, the Cancer Genetics Service at the National Cancer Centre Singapore has continued to experience a steady increase in demand for its service. Nevertheless, significant no-show rates have been reported. This study sought to determine whether an association exists between appointment waiting times and attendance rates. Data was gathered for all participants meeting inclusion criteria. Attendance rates and appointment waiting times were calculated. The relationship between mean waiting times for those who did and did not attend their scheduled appointments was evaluated using Welch’s t test and linear regression model. The results showed a significant difference in mean appointment waiting times between patients who did and did not attend (32.66 versus 43.50 days respectively; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, patients who waited for longer than 37 days were significantly less likely to attend. No-show rates increased as the waiting time increased, at a rate of 19.60% per 20 days and 21.40% per 30 days. In conclusion, appointment waiting time is a significant predictor for patient attendance. Strategies to ensure patients receive an appointment within the necessary timeframe at the desired setting are important to ensure that individuals at increased cancer risk attend their appointments in order to manage their cancer risks effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, B., McLosky, J., Wasilevich, E., Lyon-Callo, S., Duquette, D. & Copeland, G. (2012). Barriers and facilitators for utilization of genetic counselling and risk assessment services in young female breast cancer survivors. Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, 2012, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, P., Green, K., Clancy, T., Lalloo, F., Hill, J., & Evans, D. G. (2015). Improving the uptake of predictive testing and colorectal screening in Lynch syndrome: a regional primary care survey. Clinical Genetics, 87, 517–524.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. H., Rahm, A. K., & Williams, J. L. (2016). Alternate service delivery models in cancer genetic counselling: a mini review. Frontiers in Oncology, 6(120), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakley, M., Cleary, V., Power, N., & O’Reilly, S. (2017). BRCA1/2 germline testing in non-mucinour epithelial ovarian carcinoma: changing international practice and implications for service provision. European Journal of Human Genetics, 25, 167–168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, A., Kurian, A. W., Gabree, M., Mills, M. A., Anderson, M. J., Kobayashi, Y., et al. (2015). Clinical actionability of multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment. JAMA Oncology, 1(7), 943–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, B. K., Copson, E., Maishman, T., Abraham, J. E., & Eccles, D. M. (2015). Understanding of BRCA VUS genetic results by breast cancer specialists. BMC Cancer, 15, 936.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eccleston, A., Bentley, A., Dyer, M., Strydom, A., Vereecken, W., George, A., & Rahman, N. (2017). A cost-effective evaluation of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in UK women with ovarian cancer. Value in Health, 20(4), 567–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, C., Fischer, C., Dikow, N., & Schott, S. (2017). Familial breast cancer: Genetic counseling over time, including patients’ expectations and initiators considering the Angelina Jolie effect. PLoS One, 12(5), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farooqui, M., Hassali, M. A., Shatar, A. K., Shafie, A. A., Seang, T. B. & Farooqui, M. A. (2011). A qualitative exploration of Malaysian cancer patients’ perspectives on cancer and its treatment. BMC Public Health, 11, 525. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-525.

  • Finch, A. P. M., Lubinski, J., Moller, P., Singer, C. F., Karlan, B., Senter, L., et al. (2014). Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(15), 1547–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, L., Bramald, S., Chapman, C., Chi, C., Cornelius, V., Douglas, F., et al. (2003). What motivates interest in attending a familial cancer genetics clinic? Familial Cancer, 2(3–4), 159–169.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, M., & Pothuri, B. (2017). Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing in ovarian cancer clinical practice: a review of the literature. Gynecologic Oncology Research and Practice, 4(4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasvold, P. E., & Wootton, R. (2011). Use of telephone and SMS reminders to improve attendance at hospital appointments: a systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 17(7), 358–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heald, B., Rybicki, L., Clements, D., Marquard, J., Mester, J., Noss, R., et al. (2016). Assessment of clinical workload for general and specialty genetic counselors at an academic medical center: a tool for evaluating genetic counseling practices. Nature Partner Journals: Genomic Medicine, 1, 16010.

  • Humphreys, L., Hunter, A. G. W., Zimak, A., O’Brien, A., Korneluk, Y., & Cappelli, M. (2000). Why patients do not attend for their appointments at a genetics clinic. Journal of Medical Genetics, 37(10), 810–815.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juthe, R. H., Zaharchuk, A., & Wang, C. (2015). Celebrity disclosures and information seeking: the case of Angelina Jolie. Genetics in Medicine, 17(7), 545–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalia, M. (2013). Personalized oncology: recent advances and future challenges. Metabolism, 62(1), 11–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S.-T., Yuen, J., Zhou, K., Ishak, N. D. B., Chen, Y., Met-Domestici, M., et al. (2016). Impact of subsidies on cancer genetic testing uptake in Singapore. Journal of Medical Genetics, 0, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, E., Zaleski, C., Benishek, K., McCarthy, C. A., Giampietro, P. F., Reynolds, K., et al. (2008). Clinical genetics provider real-time workflow study. Genetics in Medicine, 10(9), 699–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, K., Mustafa, A., Tahtamouni, S., Taha, E., & Hassan, R. (2016). A quality improvement project to reduce the ‘no show’ rate in a paediatric neurology clinic. The British Medical Journal, 5(1), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, M. E., Storm, C. D., Weitzel, J., Wollins, D. S., & Offit, K. (2010). American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28(5), 893–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu, J., & Lee, T. H. (2017). The waiting game—why providers may fail to reduce wait times. The New England Journal of Medicine, 376(24), 2309–2311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, Y. C., Ganz, P. A., Aberle, D., Abernethy, A., Bekelman, J., Brawley, O., et al. (2013). Delivering high-quality and affordable care throughout the cancer care continuum. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(32), 4151–4157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, R. Y. C., Met-Domestici, M., Zhou, K., Guzman, A. B., Lim, S. T., Soo, K. C., et al. (2016). Using quality improvement methods and time-driven activity-based costing to improve value-based cancer care delivery at a cancer genetics clinic. Journal of Oncology Practice, 12(3), 320–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, V. W., Koh, P. K., Chow, W. L., & Lim, J. F. Y. (2012). Predictive genetic testing of first degree relatives of mutation carriers is a cost-effective strategy in preventing hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer in Singapore. Familial Cancer, 11, 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank colleagues and leadership from the National Cancer Centre Singapore, in particular from the Cancer Genetics Service, for their continued support and contribution towards this study. We would like to thank all doctors from the public and private medical institutions alike for referring their patients to us. Furthermore, we would like to thank all of our patients, without whom our cancer genetics service would not run and this study would not be made possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TS was responsible for the data interpretation and drafting of the manuscript. ZALT was responsible for the statistical analysis of the data and contributed towards the methods section of the manuscript. JM was responsible for the statistical analysis and contributed towards the interpretation of the data. EC and STL gave their critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content. JN was involved in the conception and design of the study, obtained study funding and contributed towards the critical review of the study to include insightful intellectual content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanne Ngeow.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Tarryn Shaw, Julie Metras, Zoe Ang Li Ting, Eliza Courtney, and Shao-Tzu Li declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Joanne Ngeow has received research grants from AstraZeneca for ovarian cancer research.

Human Studies and Informed Consent

The study was approved by the Singhealth Centralized Institutional Review Board (CIRB number 2011/826/B). No informed consent was required from participants as data was anonymously extracted from the electronic booking system. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.

Animal Studies

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaw, T., Metras, J., Ting, Z.A.L. et al. Impact of Appointment Waiting Time on Attendance Rates at a Clinical Cancer Genetics Service. J Genet Counsel 27, 1473–1481 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0259-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0259-z

Keywords

Navigation