Skip to main content
Log in

An iPhone Application Intervention to Promote Surveillance Among Women with a BRCA Mutation: Pre-intervention Data

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Women with BRCA mutations, at significantly increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer, do not consistently adhere to management guidelines due to lack of awareness and challenges tracking appointments. We developed an iPhone application (app) to help BRCA carriers manage their surveillance. We explored baseline awareness and adherence to surveillance guidelines and analytic data from 21 months of app use. Descriptive statistics were calculated on responses (N = 86) to a survey about surveillance awareness and practices. The majority were aware of breast surveillance guidelines, but only one third were aware of ovarian surveillance guidelines. In practice, the majority reported a clinical breast exam within 6 months, just over half reported a mammogram and breast MRI in the last year, and under half reported ovarian surveillance in the last year. Nearly 50% reported difficulty remembering appointments. Although only 69 received access codes, 284 unique users attempted to enter the app, which was visible in the iTunes store but only available to those with a study code. Evaluation of analytic data demonstrated user engagement with study participants accessing the app 427 times over the 21-month time period (range 2–57; mean = 6.28). Results indicate participants were more likely to know screening guidelines than practice them. There was interest in the app and users were engaged, suggesting app value. We will send a follow-up survey after 18 months of app use for additional evaluation and feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atzinger, C. L., Melvin, A., & Heald, B. (2011). Presented abstracts from the Thirtieth Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (San Diego, CA, October 2011). Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20(6), 690–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-011-9404-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin, J. R., Smith, K. R., Croyle, R. T., Baty, B. J., Wylie, J. E., Dutson, D., …, Lyon, E. (2003). Genetic testing for a BRCA1 mutation: prophylactic surgery and screening behavior in women 2 years post testing. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 118A(3), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.10102.

  • Buchanan, A. H., Voils, C. I., Schildkraut, J. M., Fine, C., Horick, N. K., Marcom, P. K., …, Skinner, C. S. (2017). Adherence to recommended risk management among unaffected women with a BRCA mutation. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 26(1), 79–92.

  • Calderon-Margalit, R., & Paltiel, O. (2004). Prevention of breast cancer in women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Cancer, 112(3), 357–364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Champion, V. L., & Skinner, C. S. (2003). Differences in perceptions of risk, benefits, and barriers by stage of mammography adoption. Journal of Women's Health, 12(3), 277–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, S., Thind, H., Liu, B., Champagne, N., Jacobs, M., & Massey, R. I. (2016). Mobile phone apps for preventing cancer through educational and behavioral interventions: state of the art and remaining challenges. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 4(2), e69. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5361.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. B., Axilbund, J. E., Buys, S., Crawford, B., Farrell, C. D., Friedman, S., …, Weitzel, J. N. (2010). Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 8(5), 562–594. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2010.0043.

  • Daly, M. B., Axilbund, J. E., Buys, S., Crawford, B., Friedman, S., Garber, J., …, Whelan, A. (2012). NCCN guidelines version 1.2012 genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. Retrieved from nccn.org.

  • Daly, M. B., Pilarski, R., Axilbund, J., Buys, S. S., Crawford, B., Farmer, M., & et al. (2014). NCCN guidelines version 2.2014 genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. NCCN Guidelines.

  • Daly, M. B., Pilarski, R., Berry, M., Buys, S. S., Farmer, M., Friedman, S., …, Wiesner, G. L. (2017). NCCN guidelines version 2.2017 panel members: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian (pp. 1540-1405). Retrieved from

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340.

  • DiMatteo, M. R., Hays, R. D., Gritz, E. R., Bastani, R., Crane, L., Elashoff, R., …, Marcus, A. (1993). Patient adherence to cancer control regimens: scale development and initial validation. Psychological Assessment, 5(1), 102.

  • Ernsting, C., Dombrowski, S. U., Oedekoven, M., JL, O. S., Kanzler, M., Kuhlmey, A., & Gellert, P. (2017). Using smartphones and health apps to change and manage health behaviors: a population-based survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(4), e101. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6838.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Euhus, D. (2012). Managing the breast in patients who test positive for hereditary breast cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 19(6), 1738–1744. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2258-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Free, C., Phillips, G., Watson, L., Galli, L., Felix, L., Edwards, P., …, Haines, A. (2013). The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine, 10(1), e1001363. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001363.

  • Grann, V., Patel, P., Jacobson, J., Warner, E., Heitjan, D., Ashby-Thompson, M., …, Neugut, A. (2011). Comparative effectiveness of screening and prevention strategies among <i>BRCA1/2</i>-affected mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 125(3), 837–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1043-4.

  • Julian-Reynier, C., Mancini, J., Mouret-Fourme, E., Gauthier-Villars, M., Bonadona, V., Berthet, P., …, Nogues, C. (2011). Cancer risk management strategies and perceptions of unaffected women 5 years after predictive genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations. European Journal of Human Genetics, 19(5), 500–506.

  • Kuchenbaecker, K. B., Hopper, J. L., Barnes, D. R., et al. (2017). Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA, 317(23), 2402–2416. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurian, A. W., Sigal, B. M., & Plevritis, S. K. (2010). Survival analysis of cancer risk reduction strategies for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28(2), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le-Petross, H. T., Whitman, G. J., Atchley, D. P., Yuan, Y., Gutierrez-Barrera, A., Hortobagyi, G. N., …, Arun, B. K. (2011). Effectiveness of alternating mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for screening women with deleterious BRCA mutations at high risk of breast cancer. Cancer, 117(17), 3900–3907. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25971.

  • Llort, G., Chirivella, I., Morales, R., Serrano, R., Sanchez, A. B., Teulé, A., …, Grana, B. (2015). SEOM clinical guidelines in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Clinical & Translational Oncology, 17, 956.

  • McKinnon, W., Naud, S., Ashikaga, T., Colletti, R., & Wood, M. (2007). Results of an intervention for individuals and families with BRCA mutations: a model for providing medical updates and psychosocial support following genetic testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(4), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-006-9078-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D., Sylvester, H., Lucas, F. L., & Miesfeldt, S. (2010). Perceptions of high-risk care and barriers to care among women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer following genetic counseling in the community setting. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-009-9261-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, S. C., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Demarco, T. A., Peshkin, B. N., Graves, K. D., Brown, K., …, Schwartz, M. D. (2010). BRCA1/2 test results impact risk management attitudes, intentions, and uptake. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0881-4.

  • Paluch-Shimon, S., Cardoso, F., Sessa, C., Balmana, J., Cardoso, M., Gilbert, F., & Senkus, E. (2016). Prevention and screening in BRCA mutation carriers and other breast/ovarian hereditary cancer syndromes: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for cancer prevention and screening. Annals of Oncology, 27(suppl_5), v103–v110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peshkin, B. N., Schwartz, M. D., Isaacs, C., Hughes, C., Main, D., & Lerman, C. (2002). Utilization of breast cancer screening in a clinically based sample of women after BRCA1/2 testing. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 11(10), 1115–1118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichert, G., Jacobs, C., Jacobs, I., Menon, U., Manchanda, R., Johnson, M., …, Izatt, L. (2010). Novel one-stop multidisciplinary follow-up clinic significantly improves cancer risk management in BRCA1/2 carriers. Familial Cancer, 9(3), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-010-9333-x.

  • Rodriguez, M. C., Ooms, A., Montanez, M., & Yan, Y. L. (2005). Perceptions of online learning quality given comfort with technology, motivation to learn technology skills, satisfaction, and online learning experience. Online Submission.

  • Schwartz, M. D., Isaacs, C., Graves, K. D., Poggi, E., Peshkin, B. N., Gell, C., …, Perley, L. (2011). Long-term outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing: risk reduction and surveillance. Cancer, n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26294.

  • Tinley, S. T., Houfek, J., Watson, P., Wenzel, L., Clark, M. B., Coughlin, S., & Lynch, H. T. (2004). Screening adherence in BRCA1/2 families is associated with primary physicians' behavior. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 125A(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.20431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wainberg, S., & Husted, J. (2004). Utilization of screening and preventive surgery among unaffected carriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 13(12), 1989–1995.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. L., Powell, C. B., Chen, L. M., Carter, J., Bae Jump, V. L., Parker, L. P., …, Gibb, R. K. (2015). Society of Gynecologic Oncology recommendations for the prevention of ovarian cancer. Cancer, 121(13), 2108–2120.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the NSGC Cancer SIG for a grant to design a tool for women with a BRCA mutation and the St. Vincent Foundation for a grant toward the development of the SNAP for BRCA iPhone app. We also appreciate the women with a BRCA mutation who participated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie A. Cohen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Authors Stephanie Cohen, Courtney Scherr, and Dawn Nixon declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human Studies and Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Written informed consent was waived per IRB approval; consent from participants was implied when they responded to the survey.

Animal Studies

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cohen, S.A., Scherr, C.L. & Nixon, D.M. An iPhone Application Intervention to Promote Surveillance Among Women with a BRCA Mutation: Pre-intervention Data. J Genet Counsel 27, 446–456 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0224-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0224-x

Keywords

Navigation