Abstract
To increase accessibility to genetics services for low-urgency patients seeking Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) carrier screening, we designed an interactive computer (IC) module that provides pre-test genetics education and allows genetics professionals to order the test without meeting the patients beforehand. We compared this module with in-person genetic counseling (GC) using a randomized trial. AJ individuals were randomized to undergo genetics education via the IC module (n = 26) or GC (n = 28). We compared post-interventional genetics knowledge, perceived genetic risk, and anxiety between the two groups, after accounting for pre-interventional scores, using ANCOVA. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was used to compare post-interventional satisfaction. Post-interventional genetics knowledge, risk perception, or anxiety were not significantly different between the two groups after accounting for baseline scores (p = 0.50–0.54), although the data are inconclusive regarding the module’s non-inferiority at a 5% margin. Post-intervention satisfaction scores were generally higher in the GC group than the IC module group. Our IC module has the potential to improve access to clinical genetics services for patients and staff, but it is not suitable for all AJ patients and cannot completely replace the benefits of in-person consultations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACOG Committee on Genetics. (2009). ACOG committee opinion no. 442: Preconception and prenatal carrier screening for genetic diseases in individuals of eastern European Jewish descent. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 114, 950–953.
Albada, A., van Dulmen, S., Lindhout, D., Bensing, J. M., & Ausems, M. G. E. M. (2012). A pre-visit tailored website enhances counselees' realistic expectations and knowledge and fulfils information needs for breast cancer genetic counselling. Familial Cancer, 11, 85–95.
Albada, A., van Dulmen, S., Spreeuwenberg, P., & Ausems, M. G. E. M. (2015). Follow-up effects of a tailored pre-counseling website with question prompt in breast cancer genetic counseling. Patient Education and Counseling, 98, 69–76.
Castellani, C., Perobelli, S., Bianchi, V., Seia, M., Melotti, P., Zanolla, L., et al. (2010). An interactive computer program can effectively educate potential users of cystic fibrosis carrier tests. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 155, 778–785.
Clow, C. L., & Scriver, C. R. (1977). Knowledge about and attitudes toward genetic screening among high-school students: The Tay-Sachs experience. Pediatrics, 59, 86–91.
Development Core Team, R. (2008). R (Version 3.1.2). Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org.
Ellis, P. D. (2009). Effect size calculators. Retrieved July 16, 2016, from http://www.polyuedu.hk/mm/effectsizefaqs/calculator/calculator.html
Gason, A. A., Aitken, M., Delatycki, M. B., Sheffield, E., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2004). Multimedia messages in genetics: Design, development, and evaluation of a computer-based instructional resource for secondary school students in a Tay-Sachs disease carrier screening program. Genetics in Medicine, 6, 226–231.
Gason, A. A., Metcalfe, S. A., Delatycki, M. B., Petrou, V., Sheffield, E., Bankier, A., & Aitken, M. (2005). Tay Sachs disease carrier screening in schools: Educational alternatives and cheekbrush sampling. Genetics in Medicine, 7, 626–632.
Green, M. J., Biesecker, B. B., McInerney, A. M., Mauger, D., & Fost, N. (2001a). An interactive computer program can effectively educate patients about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 103, 16–23.
Green, M. J., McInerney, A. M., Biesecker, B. B., & Fost, N. (2001b). Education about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: Patient preferences for a computer program or genetic counselor. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 103, 24–31.
Green, M. J., Peterson, S. K., Wagner Baker, M., Harper, G. R., Friedman, L. C., Rubinstein, W. S., & Mauger, D. T. (2004). Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 292, 442–452.
Green, M. J., Peterson, S. K., Wagner Baker, M., Friedman, L. C., Harper, G. R., Rubinstein, W. S., et al. (2005). Use of an educational computer program before genetic counseling for breast cancer susceptibility: Effects on duration and content of counseling sessions. Genetics in Medicine, 7, 221–229.
Griffith, J. M., Sorenson, J. R., Bowling, J. M., & Jennings-Grant, T. (2005a). Assessment of an interactive computer-based patient prenatal genetic screening and testing education tool. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 613–626.
Griffith, J. M., Sorenson, J. R., Jennings-Grant, T., & Fowler, B. (2005b). Development of an interactive computer-assisted instruction (ICAI) program for patient prenatal genetic screening and carrier testing for use in clinical settings. Patient Education and Counseling, 59, 199–204.
Grinzaid, K. A., Zartman Page, P., Johnson Denton, J., & Ginsberg, J. (2015). Creation of a national, at-home model for Ashkenazi Jewish carrier screening. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24, 381–387.
Gross, S. J., Pletcher, B. A., Monaghan, K. G., Practice, P., & Committee, G. (2008). Carrier screening in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent. Genetics in Medicine, 10, 54–56.
Joseph, G., Beattie, M. S., Lee, R., Braithwaite, D., Wilcox, C., Metrikin, M., et al. (2010). Pre-counseling education for low literacy women at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC): Patient experiences using the cancer risk education intervention tool (CREdIT). Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 447–462.
Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count, and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel Research Branch Report. Naval Air Station Memphis: Chief of Naval Technical Training.
Kinzie, M. B., Schorling, J. B., & Siegel, M. (1993). Prenatal alcohol education for low-income women with interactive multimedia. Patient Education and Counseling, 21, 51–60.
Klugman, S., & Gross, S. J. (2010). Ashkenazi Jewish screening in the twenty-first century. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 37, 37–46.
Kukafka, R., Lussier, Y. A., Eng, P., Patel, V. L., & Cimino, J. J. (2002). Web-based tailoring and its effect on self-efficacy: Results from the MI-HEART randomized controlled trial. Proc AMIA Symp, 2002, 410–414.
Kuppermann, M., Norton, M. E., Gates, E., Gregorich, S. E., Learman, L. A., Nakagawa, S., et al. (2009). Computerized prenatal genetic testing decision-assisting tool: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 113, 53–63.
Marteau, T. M., & Bekker, H. (1992). The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI). The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 301–306.
Michie, S., McDonald, V., & Marteau, T. M. (1997). Genetic counselling: Information given, recall and satisfaction. Patient Education and Counseling, 32, 101–106.
Mitchell, J. J., Capua, A., Clow, C., & Scriver, C. R. (1996). Twenty-year outcome analysis of genetic screening programs for Tay-Sachs and β-thalassemia disease carriers in high schools. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 59, 793–798.
Neafsey, P. J., Strickler, Z., Shellman, J., & Chartier, V. (2002). An interactive technology approach to educate older adults about drug interactions arising from over-the-counter self-medication practices. Public Health Nursing, 19, 255–262.
Norman, C. D., & Skinner, H. A. (2006). eHEALS: The ehealth literacy scale. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8, e27.
Olivier, C., Asselstine, J., Peterson, E. B., Rosati-White, L., & Stephenson, L. (2008). MUHC standards for developing effective written patient learning materials. Retrieved June 7, 2015, from http://muhcpatienteducation.mcgill.ca/muhc_patient_education_standards.pdf.
Rowley, P. T., Lipkin Jr., M., & Fisher, L. (1984). Screening and genetic counseling for beta-thalassemia trait in a population unselected for interest: Comparison of three counseling methods. American Journal of Human Genetics, 36, 677–689.
Schumi, J., & Wittes, J. T. (2011). Through the looking glass: Understanding non-inferiority. Trials, 12, 106.
Shiloh, S., Avdor, O., & Goodman, R. M. (1990). Satisfaction with genetic counseling: Dimensions and measurement. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 37, 522–529.
Somer, M., Mustonen, H., & Norio, R. (1988). Evaluation of genetic counselling: Recall of information, post-counselling reproduction, and attitude of the counsellees. Clinical Genetics, 34, 352–365.
Statistics Canada. (2013a). Ethnic Origin (264), Single and Multiple Ethnic Origin Responses (3), Generation Status (4), Age Groups (10) and Sex (3) for the Population in Private Households of Canada, Provinces, Territories, Census Metropolitan Areas and Census Agglomerations (table). Ottawa, ON: Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/dp-pd/dt-td/Rp-eng.cfm?LANG=E&APATH=3&DETAIL=0&DIM=0&FL=A&FREE=0&GC=0&GID=0&GK=0&GRP=0&PID=105396&PRID=0&PTYPE=105277&S=0&SHOWALL=0&SUB=0&Temporal=2013&THEME=95&VID=0&VNAMEE=&VNAMEF=.
Statistics Canada. (2013b). Religion (108), Immigrant Status and Period of Immigration (11), Age Groups (10) and Sex (3) for the Population in Private Households of Canada, Provinces, Territories, Census Metropolitan Areas and Census Agglomerations (table). Ottawa, ON: Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/dp-pd/dt-td/Rp-eng.cfm?LANG=E&APATH=3&DETAIL=0&DIM=0&FL=A&FREE=0&GC=0&GID=0&GK=0&GRP=0&PID=105399&PRID=0&PTYPE=105277&S=0&SHOWALL=0&SUB=0&Temporal=2013&THEME=95&VID=0&VNAMEE=&VNAMEF=.
Thomas, J. (2010). Creating effective patient education material: Workshop manual. QC: Montreal.
Wang, L.-M., & Chiou, C.-P. (2011). Effectiveness of interactive multimedia CD on self-care and powerlessness in hemodalysis patients. The Journal of Nursing Research, 19, 102–111.
Wilson, R. D., De Bie, I., Amour, C. M., Brown, R. N., Campagnolo, C., Carroll, J. C., Okun, N., Nelson, T., & Zwingerman, R. (2016). Joint SOGC-CCMG opinion for reproductive genetic carrier screening: An update for all Canadian providers of maternity and reproductive healthcare in the era of direct-to-consumer testing. JOGC, 38, 742–762.
Yee, L. M., Wolf, M., Mullen, R., Bergeron, A. R., Bailey, S. C., Levine, R., & Grobman, W. A. (2014). A randomized trial of a prenatal genetic testing interactive computerized information aid. Prenatal Diagnosis, 34, 1–6.
Yip, M. P., Chang, A. M., Chan, J., & MacKenzie, A. E. (2003). Development of the telemedicine satisfaction questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction with telemedicine: A preliminary study. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 9, 46–50.
Zaiontz, C. (2014). Real statistics (version 3.6.2). Milan: Zaiontz, Charles Retrieved from www.real-statistics.com.
Acknowledgements
We thank Julie Kristof (MJHDF; testjgd.com) for helping to develop educational resources; Lyndsay Hodgson (MUHC Education Portfolio; muhcpatienteducation.ca) for her health literacy review of our IC module; Cindie Bilodeau (MUHC Information Services) for translating the module to an online interface; Andrea Ruchon, Ron Agatep and Laura Russell for accommodating new test protocols; Nora Wong and William Foulkes (Cancer Genetics, JGH) for representing our study before the JGH REB; Rimi Joshi, Karen El-Akouri, and Mara Caplum for assisting with participant recruitment; Natalie Palfreeman for assisting with counseling in-person participants; and Xianming Tan and Raman Agnihotram (Centre for Innovative Medicine Biostatistics Services, MUHC Research Institute) for assisting with our statistical analysis. Funding was provided by the McGill University Department of Human Genetics, the Quebec Association of Genetic Counsellors Student/New Graduate Research Project Bursary, and the British Columbia Children’s Hospital Foundation/Rare Disease Foundation Microgrant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
All of the authors, Chia Wei Fan, Lysanne Castonguay, Sonja Rummell, Sébastien Lévesque, John J. Mitchell, and Guillaume Sillon, declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human Studies and Informed Consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Animal Studies
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, C.W., Castonguay, L., Rummell, S. et al. Online Module for Carrier Screening in Ashkenazi Jewish Individuals Compared with In-Person Genetics Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Genet Counsel 27, 426–438 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0133-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0133-4