Abstract
Funding policy and medico-legal climate are part of physicians’ reality and might permeate clinical decisions. This study evaluates the influence of maternal age and government funding on obstetrician/gynecologist recommendation for invasive prenatal testing (i.e. amniocentesis) for Down syndrome (DS), and its association with the physician’s assessment of the risk of liability for medical malpractice unless they recommend amniocentesis. Israeli physicians (N = 171) completed a questionnaire and provided amniocentesis recommendations for women at 18 weeks gestation with normal preliminary screening results, identical except aged 28 and 37. Amniocentesis recommendations were reversed for the younger (‘yes’ regardless of testing results: 6.4%; ‘no’ regardless of testing results: 31.6%) versus older woman (‘yes’ regardless of testing results: 40.9%; ‘no’ regardless of testing results: 7.0%; χ2 = 71.55, p < .01). About half of the physicians endorsed different recommendations per scenario; of these, 65.6% recommended amniocentesis regardless of testing results for the 37-year-old woman. Physicians routinely performing amniocentesis and those advocating for amniocentesis for all women ≥ age 35 were approximately twice as likely to vary their recommendations per scenario. Physicians who perceived risk of liability for malpractice as large were nearly one-and-a-half times more likely to vary recommendations. The results indicate physicians’ recommendations are influenced by maternal age, though age is already incorporated in prenatal DS risk evaluations. The physician’s assessment of the risk that they will be sued unless they recommend amniocentesis may contribute to this spurious influence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG). (2013). ACOG committee opinion no. 551: Coping with the stress of medical professional liability litigation. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 121(1), 220–222.
American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG). (2015). ACOG committee opinion no. 640: Cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 126(3), 691–692.
Anderson, B. L., Gigerenzer, G., Parker, S., & Schulkin, J. (2014). Statistical literacy in obstetricians and gynecologists. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 36(1), 5–17. doi:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00194.x.
Asher, E., Dvir, S., Seidman, D. S., Greenberg-Dotan, S., Kedem, A., Sheizaf, B., et al. (2013). Defensive medicine among obstetricians and gynecologists in tertiary hospitals. PloS One, 8(3), e57108. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057108.
Asher, E., Greenberg-Dotan, S., Halevy, J., Glick, S., & Reuveni, H. (2012). Defensive medicine in Israel – A nationwide survey. PloS One, 7(8), e42613. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042613Bishop.
Bishop, T. F., Federman, A. D., & Keyhani, S. (2010). Physicians’ views on defensive medicine: A National Survey. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(12), 1081–1083. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.155.
Blumenthal-Barby, J. S., & Krieger, H. (2014). Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: A critical review using a systematic search strategy. Medical Decision Making, 35(4), 539–547. doi:10.1177/0272989X14547740.
Buchanan, A., Sachs, A., Toler, T., & Tsipis, J. (2014). NIPT: Current utilization and implications for the future of prenatal genetic counseling. Prenatal Diagnosis, 34(9), 850–857. doi:10.1002/pd.4382.
Croskerry, P. (2015). Clinical decision making. In P. R. Barach, J. P. Jacobs, S. E. Lipshultz, & P. C. Laussen (Eds.), Pediatric and congenital cardiac care (pp. 397–410). New York: Springer.
Dixon, W. J., & Mood, A. M. (1946). The statistical sign test. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 41(236), 557–566.
Genetic Support Foundation (n.d.) New NIPT Committee Opinion- Joint Statement from ACOG and SMFM. Retrieved from https://www.geneticsupportfoundation.org/new-nipt-practice-guidelines-joint-statement-from-acog-and-smfm (last accessed 02.04.17).
Ghaderi, I., Madani, A., de Gara, C. J., & Schlachta, C. M. (2013). Canadian general surgeons’ opinions about clinical practice audit. Surgery, 153(6), 762–770. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2012.11.027.
Grinshpun-Cohen, J., Miron-Shatz, T., Berkenstet, M., & Pras, E. (2015). The limited effect of information on Israeli pregnant women at advanced maternal age who decide to undergo amniocentesis. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 4(1), 1. doi:10.1186/s13584-015-0019-6.
Grinshpun-Cohen, J., Miron-Shatz, T., Ries-Levavi, L., & Pras, E. (2014). Factors that affect the decision to undergo amniocentesis in women with normal down syndrome screening results: It is all about the age. Health Expectations, 18(6), 2306–2317. doi:10.1111/hex.12200.
Gyselaers, W., Hulstaert, F., & Neyt, M. (2015). Contingent non-invasive prenatal testing: An opportunity to improve non-genetic aspects of fetal aneuploidy screening. Prenatal Diagnosis, 35(13), 1347–1352. doi:10.1002/pd.4704.
Hayashi, Y., Shimizu, Y., Netsu, S., Hanley, S., & Konno, R. (2012). High HPV vaccination uptake rates for adolescent girls after regional governmental funding in Shiki City, Japan. Vaccine, 30(37), 5547–5550. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.038.
Israel Ministry of Health. (1992). Expanding the eligibility age for amniocentesis [Hebrew]. Retrieved from http://www.health.gov.il/hozer/mk36_1992.pdf (last accessed 05.04.17).
Israel Ministry of Health. (2007). Screening for fetal Down syndrome [Hebrew]. Retrieved from http://www.health.gov.il/hozer/mr15_2007.pdf (last accessed 05.04.17).
Israel Ministry of Health. (2011). New provisions regarding amniocentesis and chorionic villi sampling [Hebrew]. Retrieved from http://www.health.gov.il/hozer/mr47_2011.pdf (last accessed 05.04.17).
Israel Ministry of Health. (2013). Screening tests for identification of women at risk for carrying a fetus with Down syndrome [Hebrew]. Retrieved from http://www.health.gov.il/hozer/mr06_2013.pdf (last accessed 05.04.17).
Israel Ministry of Health. (2017). Genetic counseling for diagnosis of illnesses or fetal defects leading up to or during pregnancy. Retrieved from http://www.health.gov.il/hozer/bz03_2017.pdf (last accessed 05.04.17).
Israel Ministry of Health. (n.d.). Amniotic Fluid Test. Retrieved from http://www.health.gov.il/English/Topics/Genetics/checks/during_pregnancy/Pages/Amniotic_fluid.aspx (last accessed 05.04.17).
Jena, A. B., Schoemaker, L., Bhattacharya, J., & Seabury, S. A. (2015). Physician spending and subsequent risk of malpractice claims: Observational study. BMJ, 351, h5516. doi:10.1136/bmj.h5516.
Jennings, J.C. (2014). Optimizing Women's health care resources. Obstetrics & Gynecology,124(1),1-4. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000323.
Kaufman, D. J., Katsanis, S. H., Javitt, G. H., Murphy, J. A., Scott, J. A., & Hudson, K. L. (2008). Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis in US genetic testing laboratories: A survey of laboratory directors. Clinical Genetics, 74(4), 367–373. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01070.x.
Lesser, Y., & Rabinowitz, J. (2001). Elective amniocentesis in low-risk pregnancies: Decision making in the era of information and uncertainty. American Journal of Public Health, 91(4), 639–641.
McGovern, M. M., Benach, M., & Zinberg, R. (2003). Interaction of genetic counselors with molecular genetic testing laboratories: Implications for non-geneticist health care providers. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 119A(3), 297–301. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.20196.
Minkoff, H. (2012). Fear of litigation and cesarean section rates. Seminars in Perinatology, 36(5), 390–394. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.025.
Morgan, M. A., Driscoll, D. A., Mennuti, M. T., & Schulkin, J. (2004). Practice patterns of obstetrician-gynecologists regarding preconception and prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Genetics in Medicine, 6(5), 450–455. doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000139509.04177.4b.
National Health Service (UK). (2014). Amniocentesis – when it is used. Retrieved December 4, 2015 from: http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Amniocentesis/Pages/When-should-it-be-done.aspx (last accessed 05.04.17).
Pergament, D., & Ilijic, K. (2014). The legal past, present and future of prenatal genetic testing: Professional liability and other legal challenges affecting patient access to services. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 3(4), 1437–1465. doi:10.3390/jcm3041437.
Raffi, F., Shaw, R. W., & Amer, S. A. (2012). National survey of the current management of endometriomas in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment. Human Reproduction, 27(9), 2712–2719. doi:10.1093/humrep/des195.
Rossignol, M., Moutquin, J., Boughrassa, F., Bédard, M., Chaillet, N., Charest, C., et al. (2013). Preventable obstetrical interventions: How many caesarean sections can be prevented in Canada? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 35(5), 434–443. doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30934-8.
Sagi, M., & Uhlmann, W. R. (2013). Genetic counseling services and training of genetic counselors in Israel: An overview. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22(6), 890–896.
Shen, O., Rabinowitz, R., Geist, R. R., & Shafir, E. (2010). Effect of background case characteristics on decisions in the delivery room. Medical Decision Making, 30(4), 518–522. doi:10.1177/0272989X09353451.
Shurtz, I., Brzezinski, A., & Frumkin, A. (2016). The impact of financing of screening tests on utilization and outcomes: The case of amniocentesis. Journal of Health Economics, 48, 61–73. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.02.001.
Shwayder, J. M. (2010). Waiting for the tide to change: Reducing risk in the turbulent sea of liability. Obstetrics & Gynecology., 116(1), 8–15. doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181e5e2ec.
Simpson, J. L. (2012). Invasive procedures for prenatal diagnosis: Any future left? Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 26(5), 625–638. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.05.007.
Socol, M. L., & Socol, D. K. (2012). How do we deal with the legal risks? Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 55(4), 1014–1020. doi:10.1097/grf.0b013e3182704f55.
Srebnik, N., Miron-Shatz, T., Rolison, J. J., Hanoch, Y., & Tsafrir, A. (2013). Physician recommendation for invasive prenatal testing: The case of the ‘precious baby’. Human Reproduction, 28(11), 3007–3011. doi:10.1093/humrep/det354.
Stark, Z., Massie, J., McClaren, B., Ioannou, L., Cousens, N., Lewis, S., et al. (2013). Current practice and attitudes of Australian obstetricians toward population-based carrier screening for inherited conditions. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16(02), 601–607. doi:10.1017/thg.2012.152.
Wegwarth, O., Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Gaissmaier, W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A National Survey of primary care physicians in the United States. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156(5), 340–349. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-5-201203060-00005.
Zhao, X., Wang, P., Tao, X., & Zhong, N. (2013). Genetic services and testing in China. Journal of Community Genetics, 4(3), 379–390. doi:10.1007/s12687-013-0144-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Talya Miron-Shatz, Sivan R. Rapaport, Naama Srebnik, Yaniv Hanoch, Jonina Rabinowitz, Glen M. Doniger, Linda Levi, Jonathan J. Rolison, and Avi Tsafrir declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human Studies and Informed Consent
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Animal Studies
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miron-Shatz, T., Rapaport, S.R., Srebnik, N. et al. Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing Recommendations are Influenced by Maternal Age, Statistical Misconception and Perceived Liability. J Genet Counsel 27, 59–68 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0120-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0120-9