Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective Evaluation of Predictive DNA Testing for Huntington’s Disease in a Large German Center

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

We present a prospective study of counselees seeking predictive testing for Huntington’s disease at the Huntington Center North Rhine-Westphalia (Bochum, Germany) between 2010 and 2012. The aim was to observe the decision-making process of at-risk individuals and explore their experiences following the decision as well as the impacts of positive and negative mutation results. Data were collected using two standardized questionnaires as well as via a semi-standardized telephone interview one year after the initial counseling session. Seventy-two  individuals participated in at least one of the three phases of the survey, including 31 individuals in the telephone interview. Sociodemographic data were in accordance with previous reports. The process of predictive testing was generally perceived in a positive manner, with almost all interviewees reporting a balanced emotional state one year after initial counseling, regardless of the decision for or against the test. The most important reasons named in favor of or against testing were assembled as well as different aspects regarding the satisfaction with the reached decision. In line with and expanding previous observations on gender-related differences in decision-making, our results suggest that gender-related aspects should be more strongly taken into account in genetic counseling during the predictive testing and counseling processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åhman, A., Sarkadi, A., Lindgren, P., & Rubertsson, C. (2016). “it made you think twice” – An interview study of women’s perception of a web-based decision aid concerning screening and diagnostic testing for fetal anomalies. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16(1), 267. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1057-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Arning, L., Witt, C. N., Epplen, J. T., & Stemmler, S. (2015). Genetic Counselling for Predictive Testing in Huntington’s Disease in One Centre since 1993. Gender-specific aspects of decision-making. Journal of Huntington’s Disease, 4(1), 87–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, G. P., Dorsey, R., Gusella, J. F., Hayden, M. R., Kay, C., Leavitt, B. R., et al. (2015). Huntington disease. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 1, 15005. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bombard, Y., Veenstra, G., Friedman, J. M., Creighton, S., Currie, L., Paulsen, J. S., et al., Canadian Respond-HD Collaborative Research Group. (2009). Perceptions of genetic discrimination among people at risk for Huntington’s disease: A cross sectional survey. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 338, b2175.

  • Codori, A.-M., Slavney, P. R., Rosenblatt, A., & Brandt, J. (2004). Prevalence of major depression one year after predictive testing for Huntington’s disease. Genetic Testing, 8(2), 114–119. doi:10.1089/gte.2004.8.114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dufrasne, S., Roy, M., Galvez, M., & Rosenblatt, D. S. (2011). Experience over fifteen years with a protocol for predictive testing for Huntington disease. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, 102(4), 494–504. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2010.12.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, C., Williams, J. K., Juhl, A. R., Mengeling, M., Mills, J. A., Bombard, Y., et al., I-RESPOND-HD Investigators of the Huntington Study Group. (2010). Perception, experience, and response to genetic discrimination in Huntington disease: The international RESPOND-HD study. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics: The Official Publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, 153B(5), 1081–1093. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.31079.

  • Evers-Kiebooms, G., Nys, K., Harper, P., Zoeteweij, M., Dürr, A., Jacopini, G., et al. (2002). Predictive DNA-testing for Huntington’s disease and reproductive decision making: A European collaborative study. European Journal of Human Genetics: EJHG, 10(3), 167–176. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest Keenan, K., McKee, L., & Miedzybrodzka, Z. (2015). Help or hindrance: Young people’s experiences of predictive testing for Huntington’s disease. Clinical Genetics, 87(6), 563–569. doi:10.1111/cge.12439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, P., Fanos, J. H., Korty, L., Siskind, C. E., & Hanson-Kahn, A. K. (2016). Impact of Huntington disease Gene-positive status on pre-symptomatic young adults and recommendations for genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi:10.1007/s10897-016-9951-z.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell, N., Arden-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C., & Watson, M. (2006). Guilt, blame and responsibility: men’s understanding of their role in the transmission of BRCA1/2 mutations within their family. Sociology of Health & Illness, 28(7), 969–988. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00515.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins Virani, A. K., Creighton, S. M., & Hayden, M. R. (2013). Developing a comprehensive, effective patient-friendly website to enhance decision making in predictive testing for Huntington disease. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 15(6), 466–472. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Huntington Association (IHA) and the World Federation of Neurology (WFN) Research Group on Huntington’s Chorea (1994). Guidelines for the molecular genetics predictive test in Huntington’s disease. Neurology, 44(8), 1533–1536.

  • Liede, A., Metcalfe, K., Hanna, D., Hoodfar, E., Snyder, C., Durham, C., et al. (2000). Evaluation of the needs of male carriers of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 who have undergone genetic counseling. American Journal of Human Genetics, 67(6), 1494–1504. doi:10.1086/316907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Maat-Kievit, A., Vegter-van der Vlis, M., Zoeteweij, M., Losekoot, M., van Haeringen, A., & Roos, R. (2000). Paradox of a better test for Huntington’s disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 69(5), 579–583.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, R., Tibben, A., Frontali, M., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Jones, A., Martinez-Descales, A., et al., Editorial Committee and Working Group “Genetic Testing Counselling” of the European Huntington Disease Network. (2013). Recommendations for the predictive genetic test in Huntington’s disease. Clinical Genetics, 83(3), 221–231. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01900.x.

  • MacLeod, R., Beach, A., Henriques, S., Knopp, J., Nelson, K., & Kerzin-Storrar, L. (2014). Experiences of predictive testing in young people at risk of Huntington’s disease, familial cardiomyopathy or hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. European Journal of Human Genetics: EJHG, 22(3), 396–401. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mandich, P., Jacopini, G., Di Maria, E., Sabbadini, G., Abbruzzese, G., Chimirri, F., et al. (1998). Predictive testing for Huntington’s disease: Ten years’ experience in two Italian centres. Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 19(2), 68–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, J. S., Nance, M., Kim, J.-I., Carlozzi, N. E., Panegyres, P. K., Erwin, C., et al. (2013). A review of quality of life after predictive testing for and earlier identification of neurodegenerative diseases. Progress in Neurobiology, 110, 2–28. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H., Cohen, A., Mandeli, J., Weltz, C., & Port, E. R. (2016). Decision-making in breast cancer surgery: Where do patients go for information? The American Surgeon, 82(5), 397–402.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scuffham, T. M., & MacMillan, J. C. (2014). Huntington disease: Who seeks presymptomatic genetic testing, why and what are the outcomes? Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(5), 754–761. doi:10.1007/s10897-013-9678-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, K. M., & Fraint, A. (2015). Therapeutic advances in Huntington’s disease. Movement Disorders, 30(11), 1539–1546. doi:10.1002/mds.26331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shiloh, S. (1996). Decision-making in the context of genetic risk. In The troubled helix. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511570049.005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. A., Stephenson, M., Jacobs, C., & Quarrell, O. (2013). Doing the right thing for one’s children: Deciding whether to take the genetic test for Huntington’s disease as a moral dilemma. Clinical Genetics, 83(5), 417–421. doi:10.1111/cge.12124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2005). Gender differences in attitudes among those at risk for Huntington’s disease. Genetic Testing, 9(2), 152–157. doi:10.1089/gte.2005.9.152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Huntington’s Disease Collaborative Research Group. (1993). A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell, 72(6), 971–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibben, A. (2007). Predictive testing for Huntington’s disease. Brain Research Bulletin, 72(2–3), 165–171. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.10.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trembath, M. K., Tassicker, R. J., Collins, V. R., Mansie, S., Sheffield, L. J., & Delatycki, M. B. (2006). Fifteen years of experience in predictive testing for Huntington disease at a single testing center in Victoria, Australia. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 8(11), 673–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trottier, Y., Biancalana, V., & Mandel, J. L. (1994). Instability of CAG repeats in Huntington’s disease: Relation to parental transmission and age of onset. Journal of Medical Genetics, 31(5), 377–382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wedderburn, S., Panegyres, P. K., Andrew, S., Goldblatt, J., Liebeck, T., McGrath, F., et al. (2013). Predictive gene testing for Huntington disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Internal Medicine Journal, 43(12), 1272–1279. doi:10.1111/imj.12176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, Y. J., Deyoung, C. G., & Hirsh, J. B. (2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the big five. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 178. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, E. J., & Tabrizi, S. J. (2014). Targets for future clinical trials in Huntington’s disease: what’s in the pipeline? Movement Disorders: Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 29(11), 1434–1445. doi:10.1002/mds.26007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. K., Erwin, C., Juhl, A. R., Mengeling, M., Bombard, Y., Hayden, M. R., … I-RESPOND-HD Investigators of the Huntington Study Group. (2010a). In their own words: Reports of stigma and genetic discrimination by people at risk for Huntington disease in the international RESPOND-HD study. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics: The Official Publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, 153B(6), 1150–1159. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.31080

  • Williams, J. K., Erwin, C., Juhl, A., Mills, J., Brossman, B., Paulsen, J. S., & I-RESPOND-HD Investigators of the Huntington Study Group. (2010b). Personal factors associated with reported benefits of Huntington disease family history or genetic testing. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 14(5), 629–636. doi:10.1089/gtmb.2010.0065.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zielonka, D., Mielcarek, M., & Landwehrmeyer, G. B. (2015). Update on Huntington’s disease: Advances in care and emerging therapeutic options. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 21(3), 169–178. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.12.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants for taking part in our survey and the data protection office of the Ruhr-University Bochum for anonymization. In addition, special thanks to Mrs. Bork (psychiatrist in the LWL clinics Münster, Germany) for performing the telephone interviews and the genetic counselor and psychotherapist colleagues for intense discussions. This study represents part of the doctoral thesis of AI.

Author Carsten Saft was supported financially by FoRUM grant K040-09.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aysegül Ibisler.

Ethics declarations

Funding

Author Carsten Saft was supported financially by FoRUM grant K040–09.

Conflict of Interest

Authors Aysegül Ibisler, Sebastian Ocklenburg, Susanne Stemmler, Larissa Arning, Jörg T. Epplen, Carsten Saft, and Sabine Hoffjan declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Conflict of Interest outside the Submitted Work

Author Carsten Saft reports grants from Teva Endowed Professorship, grants from “Cure Huntington’s Disease Initiative” (CHDI), grants from Biogen, personal fees from Temmler Pharma GmbH & Co.KG, personal fees from Desitin Arzneimittel GmbH, outside the submitted work; C. Saft received institutional compensation and/or travel or accommodation payments in the context of the Registry-Study of the Euro-HD-Network, the ENROLL-HD Study (CHDI), in the context of the MitoNet-study, the ACR16-Study (Neurosearch), the AFQ-Study (Novartis), the Selisistat-Studies (Siena Biotech), the PRIDE-HD-Study and LEGATO-HD Study (both TEVA), the Amaryllis-Study (Pfizer) as well as the IONIS Antisense trial (IONIS-HTTRx).

Human Studies and Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. The Ethics Committee of the Ruhr-University Bochum (Germany) approved the study protocol.

Animal Studies

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Additional information

Carsten Saft and Sabine Hoffjan contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibisler, A., Ocklenburg, S., Stemmler, S. et al. Prospective Evaluation of Predictive DNA Testing for Huntington’s Disease in a Large German Center. J Genet Counsel 26, 1029–1040 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0085-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0085-8

Keywords

Navigation