Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Self-Defense, Retaliation, and Gender: Clarifying Motivations for Physical Partner Violence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The motivations behind intimate partner violence (IPV) have been a controversial topic. It has been suggested that women’s use of IPV mainly occurs in the context of self-defense (Saunders 1986). However, men also report perpetrating IPV in self-defense (Harned 2001; Makepeace 1986). This article differentiates self-defense from retaliation and reviews findings regarding these motives for perpetrators of IPV. Self-defense motives are common among battered women; however, undergraduates and arrested perpetrators often report other motives. Women do not consistently report using violence in self-defense more than men do. Clinical and research implications are discussed and existing self-defense measures are critiqued.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett, O. W., Lee, C. Y., & Thelen, R. E. (1997). Gender differences in attributions of self-defense and control in interpartner aggression. Violence Against Women, 3(5), 462–481.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Black, H. C. (1991). Black’s law dictionary (Abridged (6th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais, S. L., Reeves, K. A., Nicholls, T. L., Telford, R. P., & Fiebert, M. S. (2012). Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships, Part 2: Rates of male and female perpetration. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 170–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., & Nicholls, T. L. (2005). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1—The conflict of theory and data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(6), 680–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmquist, J., Hamel, J., Shorey, R. C., Labrecque, L., Ninnemann, A., & Stuart, G. L. (2014). Motivations for intimate partner violence in men and women arrested for domestic violence and court referred to batterer intervention programs. Partner Abuse, 5(4), 359–374.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, A., & Graham, K. (2010). “Why did it happen?” A review and conceptual framework for research on perpetrators’ and victims’ explanations for intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(3), 239–251.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R., Wright, S., Lloyd, S., & Sebastian, J. A. (1991). Sex differences in motivations and effects in dating violence. Family Relations, 51–57.

  • Hamby, S. (2009). The gender debate about intimate partner violence: Solutions and dead ends. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 1, 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harned, M. S. (2001). Abused women or abused men? An examination of the context and outcomes of dating violence. Violence and Victims, 16(3), 269–285.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henning, K., Jones, A. R., & Holdford, R. (2005). “I didn’t do it, but if I did I had a good reason”: Minimization, denial, and attributions of blame among male and female domestic violence offenders. Journal of Family Violence, 20(3), 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettrich, E. L., & O’Leary, K. D. (2007). Females’ reasons for their physical aggression in dating relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(9), 1131–1143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kernsmith, P. (2005). Exerting power or striking back: A gendered comparison of motivations for domestic violence perpetration. Violence and Victims, 20(2), 173–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leisring, P. A. (2013). Physical and emotional abuse in romantic relationships: Motivation for perpetration among college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(7), 1437–1454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, J. M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence victimization. Family Relations, 35(3), 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband-abuse or self-defense? Violence and Victims, 1(1), 47–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, R. C., Cornelius, T. L., & Bell, K. M. (2008). A critical review of theoretical frameworks for dating violence: Comparing the dating and marital fields. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(3), 185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, R. C., Meltzer, C., & Cornelius, T. L. (2010). Motivations for self-defensive aggression in dating relationships. Violence and Victims, 25(5), 662–676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (2006). Future research on gender symmetry in physical assaults on partners. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1086–1097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, G. L., Moore, T. M., Coop Gordon, K., Hellmuth, J. C., Ramsey, S. E., & Kahler, C. W. (2006). Reasons for intimate partner violence perpetration among arrested women. Violence Against Women, 12, 609–621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Penny A. Leisring.

Ethics declarations

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

N/A.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leisring, P.A., Grigorian, H.L. Self-Defense, Retaliation, and Gender: Clarifying Motivations for Physical Partner Violence. J Fam Viol 31, 949–953 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9874-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9874-3

Keywords

Navigation