Abstract
Fractions are an important component of mathematics instruction, with implications for both academics and daily living. Yet, more research is needed regarding fraction instruction for students with disabilities, including those with developmental disabilities. This study investigated the effects of using the Virtual-Abstract framework to teach sixth-grade students with developmental disabilities to identify fractions. Through a multiple probe across participants design, researchers examined if a functional relation existed between students’ acquisition of the mathematical behavior of identifying fractions and the Virtual-Abstract (VA) framework. For each student, the study involved three-to-five baseline sessions, six-to-nine intervention sessions, and two maintenance sessions. Two of the students also completed three abstract boost sessions and two additional maintenance sessions. Accuracy data reflected students’ ability to identify fractions on five problems answered independently. A functional relation existed between students’ acquisition of identifying fractions and the VA framework. Yet, two of the students failed to initially maintain their levels of accuracy. The VA framework can help students with developmental disabilities acquire mathematical behaviors, such as identifying fractions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, J., & Morin, L. L. (2016). Evidence-based practices: applications of concrete representational abstract framework across math concepts for students with disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31, 34–44.
Alajmi, A. H. (2012). How do elementary textbooks address fractions? A review of mathematics textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9342-1.
Alberto, P., & Troutman, A. (2009). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Bailey, D. H., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Geary, D. C. (2012). Competence with fractions predicts gains in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 447–455.
Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., Doughty, T. T., & Courtney, W. T. (2014). Virtual and concrete manipulatives: A comparison of approaches for solving mathematics problems for students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 44, 180–193.
Bouck, E. C., Bassette, L., Shurr, J., Park, J., Kerr, J., & Whorley, A. (2017a). Teaching equivalent fractions to secondary students with disabilities via the virtual-representational-abstract instructional sequence. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32, 220–231.
Bouck, E. C., Chamberlain, C., & Park, J. (2017b). Concrete and app-based manipulatives to support students with disabilities with subtraction. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52, 317–331.
Bouck, E. C., Park, J., Sprick, J., Shurr, J., Bassette, L., & Whorley, A. (2017c). Using the virtual-abstract instructional sequence to teach addition of fractions. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 70, 163–174.
Bouck, E. C., Park, J., Shurr, J., Bassette, L., & Whorley, A. (2018a). Using the virtual-representational-abstract approach to support students with intellectual disability in mathematics. Focus on Autism and Developmental Disabilities. [Advanced Online Publication].
Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., & Park, J. (2018b). The concrete-representational-abstract approach for students with learning disabilities: An evidence-based practice synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 39, 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517721712.
Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Crehan, K., Babbitt, B., & Pierce, T. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 99–111.
Brainingcamp (2017). Fraction Tiles. Retrieved from https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/fraction-tiles-manipulative/id1111230448?mt=8.
Browder, D. M., Jimenez, B. A., Spooner, F., Saunders, A., Hudson, M., & Bethune, K. S. (2012). Early numeracy intruction for students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37, 308–320.
Cass, M., Cates, D., Smith, M., & Jackson, C. (2003). Effects of manipulative instruction on solving area and perimeter problems by students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 112–120.
Collins, B. C. (2012). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing.
Common Core State Standards Initiative (2017). Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/.
Doabler, C. T. & Fien, H. (2013). Explicit mathematics instruction: what teachers can do for teaching students with mathematics difficulties? Intervention for School and Clinic, 48, 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212473141.
Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Long, J., Namkung, J., Hamlett, C. L., Cirino, P. T., et al. (2013). Improving at-risk learners’ understanding of fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032446.
Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Sterba, S. K., Long, J., Namkung, J., Malone, A., et al. (2014). Does working memory moderate the effects of fraction intervention? An aptitude-treatment interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034341.
Gast, D. L., & Spriggs, A. D. (2014). Visual analysis of graphic data. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 176–210). New York: Routledge.
Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309334431.
Haring, N. G., & Eaton, M. D. (1978). Systematic instructional procedures: An instructional hierarchy. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 23–40). Columbus: Merrill.
Jordan, L., Miller, M. D., & Mercer, C. D. (1998). The effects of concrete to semiconcrete to abstract instruction in the acquisition and retention of fraction concepts and skills. Learning Disabilities, 9, 115–122.
Jordan, N. C., Hansen, N., Fuchs, L. S., Siegler, R. S., Gersten, R., & Micklos, D. (2013). Developmental predictors of fraction concepts and procedures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.001.
Jordan, N. C., Resnick, I., Rodrigues, J., Hansen, N., & Dyson, N. (2017). Delaware longitudinal study of fraction learning: Implications for helping children with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416662033.
Kellems, R. O., Frandsen, K., Hansen, B., Gabrielsen, T., Clarke, B., Simons, K., & Clements, K. (2016). Teaching multi-step math skills to adults with disabilities via video prompting. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 58, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.08.013.
National Center on Intensive Intervention (2016). Principles for designing intervention in mathematics. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education, U. S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.intensiveintervention.org/sites/default/files/Princip_Effect_Math_508.pdf.
Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Brown, L. (2009). An improved effect size for single case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP). Behavior Therapy, 40, 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006.
Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining non-overlap and trend for single case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006.
Patton, J. R., Cronin, M. E., Bassett, D. S., & Koppel, A. E. (1993). A life skills approach to mathematics instruction: Preparing students with learning disabilities for the real-life math demands of adulthood. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 178–187.
Powell, S. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2013). Reaching the mountaintop: Addressing the common core standards in mathematics for students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 38–48.
Root, J. R., Browder, D. M., Saunders, A. F., & Lo, Y. Y. (2017). Schema-based instruction with concrete and virtual manipulative to teach problem solving to students with autism. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516643592.
Satsangi, R., & Miller, B. (2017). The case for adopting virtual manipulatives in mathematics education for students with disabilities. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1275505.
Shin, M., & Bryant, D. P. (2015). Fraction intervention for students struggling to learn mathematics: A research synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515572910.
Shurr, J. C., Jimenez, B. A., & Bouck, E. C. (in press). Educating students with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. Book1: Research-based practices and education science. Arlington: Council for Exceptional Children.
Stroizer, S., Hinton, V., Flores, M., & Terry, L. (2015). An investigation of the effects of CRA instruction and students with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 223–236.
Torbeyns, J., Schneider, M., Xin, Z., & Siegler, R. S. (2015). Bridging the gap: Fraction understanding is central to mathematics achievement in students from three different continents. Learning & Instruction, 37, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.002.
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2016). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Vukovic, R. K., Fuchs, L. S., Geary, D. C., Jordan, N. C., Gersten, R., & Siegler, R. S. (2014). Sources of individual differences in children’s understanding of fractions. Child Development, 85, 1461–1476. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12218.
Watt, S. J., & Therrien, W. J. (2016). Examining a preteaching framework to improve fraction computation outcomes among struggling learners. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 60, 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1147011.
Zhang, D., Stecker, P., & Beqiri, K. (2017). Strategies students with and without mathematics disabilities use when estimating fractions on number lines. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717704966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
The authors obtained approval to conduct the research with human participants and obtained informed consent and assent.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bouck, E.C., Park, J., Maher, C. et al. Acquiring the Skill of Identifying Fractions through the Virtual-Abstract Framework. J Dev Phys Disabil 31, 435–452 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-018-9650-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-018-9650-9