Abstract
Confrontation represents a way of challenging patients in psychotherapy to stimulate change. Confrontation draws attention to discrepancies, for example between elements in a patient’s functioning. The present study was designed to construct a conceptual model of confrontation used by therapists when trying to address two main questions: what are the risks and opportunities of confrontation and how can these effects be influenced? Fifteen therapists from the Psychotherapy Outpatient Clinic of the University of Bern in Switzerland participated in semi-standardized interviews, which were analyzed using qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Several main themes merged into a dynamic, sequential model: groundwork required before a confrontation, shaping the confrontation, the (immediate) effects, and management of negative consequences. Therapists assume that a confrontation may induce insight and can strengthen the therapeutic relationship either directly or indirectly through the repair of a rupture in the alliance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boardman, T., Catley, D., Grobe, J. E., Little, T. D., & Ahluwalia, J. S. (2006). Using motivational interviewing with smokers: Do therapist behaviors relate to engagement and therapeutic alliance? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2006.05.006.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Caspar, F. (2007). Plan analysis. In T. D. Eells (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy case formulations (2nd edn, pp. 221–289). New York: Guilford Press.
Caspar, F., & Grosse Holtforth, M. (2009). Responsiveness—Eine entscheidende Prozessvariable in der Psychotherapie. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 38(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443.38.1.61.
Caspar, F., Rothenfluh, T., & Segal, Z. (1992). The appeal of connectionism for clinical psychology. Clinical Psychology Review, 12(7), 719–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(92)90022-Z.
Coutinho, J., Ribeiro, E., Hill, C., & Safran, J. (2011). Therapists’ and clients’ experiences of alliance ruptures: A qualitative study. Psychotherapy Research, 21(5), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2011.587469.
Grawe, K., Caspar, F., & Ambühl, H. (1990). Die Berner Therapievergleichsstudie: Zusammenfassung und Schlussfolgerungen. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 19(4), 362–376.
Hill, C. E. (1978). Development of a counselor verbal response category. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25(5), 461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.25.5.461.
Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196.
Kramer, U., Stulz, N., Berthoud, L., Caspar, F., Marquet, P., Kolly, S., … Despland, J.-N. (2015). The shorter the better? A follow-up analysis of 10-session psychiatric treatment including the motive-oriented therapeutic relationship for borderline personality disorder. Psychotherapy Research, 27(3), 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1110635.
Levitt, H. M., & Williams, D. C. (2010). Facilitating client change: Principles based upon the experience of eminent psychotherapists. Psychotherapy Research, 20(3), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300903476708.
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt: Beltz.
Meystre, C., Pascual-Leone, A., De Roten, Y., Despland, J.-N., & Kramer, U. (2015). What interventions facilitate client progress through the assimilation model? A task analysis of interventions in the psychodynamic treatment of depression. Psychotherapy Research, 25(4), 484–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2014.921352.
Miller-Bottome, M., Talia, A., Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2017). Resolving alliance ruptures from an attachment-informed perspective. Psychoanalytic Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000152.
Moyers, T. B., Miller, W. R., & Hendrickson, S. M. L. (2005). How does motivational interviewing work? Therapist interpersonal skill predicts client involvement within motivational interviewing sessions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(4), 590. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.590.
Muran, J. C., & Safran, J. D. (2002). A relational approach to psychotherapy. In F. W. Kaslow & J. J. Magnavita (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychotherapy: Psychodynamic/object relations (pp. 253–281). New York, NY: Wiley.
Murray, R. (2002). The phenomenon of psychotherapeutic change: Second-order change in one’s experience of self. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 32(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020592926010.
Polcin, D. L. (2006). Reexamining confrontation and motivational interviewing. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment, 5(4), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.adt.0000205048.44129.6a.
Reid, K. E. (1986). The use of confrontation in group treatment: Attack or challenge? Clinical Social Work Journal, 14(3), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00755855.
Ribeiro, A. P., & Gonçalves, M. M. (2010). Commentary: Innovation and stability within the dialogical self: The centrality of ambivalence. Culture & Psychology, 16(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X09353211.
Ribeiro, E., Ribeiro, A. P., Gonçalves, M. M., Horvath, A. O., & Stiles, W. B. (2013). How collaboration in therapy becomes therapeutic: The therapeutic collaboration coding system. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 86(3), 294–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.2012.02066.x.
Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045357.
Safran, J. D., Crocker, P., McMain, S., & Murray, P. (1990). Therapeutic alliance rupture as a therapy event for empirical investigation. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 27(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.27.2.154.
Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., & Eubanks-Carter, C. (2001). Repairing alliance ruptures. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022140.
Stiles, W. B., Honos-Webb, L., & Surko, M. (1998). Responsiveness in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5(4), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00166.x.
Strong, T., & Zeman, D. (2010). Dialogic considerations of confrontation as a counseling activity: An examination of Allen Ivey’s use of confronting as a microskill. Journal of Counseling and Development, 88(3), 332. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00030.x.
Timulak, L., & McElvaney, R. (2013). Qualitative meta-analysis of insight events in psychotherapy. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 26(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2013.792997.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participating therapists for making time for the interviews as well as our Masters students for their assistance gathering and analyzing the data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moeseneder, L., Figlioli, P. & Caspar, F. Confronting Patients: Therapists’ Model of a Responsiveness Based Approach. J Contemp Psychother 48, 61–67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-017-9371-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-017-9371-x