Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Head-to-head comparison of two continuous glucose monitoring systems on a cardio-surgical ICU

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In critical illness hypo-and hyperglycemia have a negative influence on patient outcome. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) could help in early detection of hypo-and hyperglycemia. A requirement for these new methods is an acceptable accuracy and precision in clinical practice. In this pilot study we prospectively evaluated the accuracy and precision of two CGM sensors (subcutaneous sensor: Sentrino®, Medtronic and intravasal sensor: Glucoclear®, Edwards) in 20 patients on a cardio-surgical ICU in a head to head comparison. CGM data were recorded for up to 48 h and values were compared with blood-gas-analysis (BGA) values, analysed with Bland–Altman-plots and color-coded surveillance error-grids. Shown are means ± standard deviations. In total 270/255 intravasal/subcutaneous pairs with BGA-values were analysed. The average runtime of the sensors was 28.4 ± 6.4 h. Correlation with BGA values yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.76 (subcutaneous sensor) and 0.92 (intravasal sensor). The Bland Altman Plots revealed an accuracy of 2.5 mg/dl, and a precision of + 43.0 mg/dl to − 38.0 mg/dl (subcutaneous sensor) and an accuracy of − 6.0 mg/dl, and a precision of + 12.4 mg/dl to − 24.4 mg/dl (intravasal sensor). No severe hypoglycemic event, defined as BG level below 40 mg/dl, occurred during treatment. Both sensors showed good accuracy in comparison to the BGA values, however they differ regarding precision, which in case of the subcutaneous sensor is considerable high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Umpierrez GE, Isaacs SD, Bazargan N, You X, Thaler LM, Kitabchi AE. Hyperglycemia: an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:978–82. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.87.3.8341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R, Jacka MJ, Egi M, Hart GK, George C, ANZICS CORE. Management Committee. The impact of early hypoglycemia and blood glucose variability on outcome in critical illness. Crit Care. 2009;13:R91. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7921.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Egi M, Bellomo R, Stachowski E, French CJ, Hart GK, Taori G, Hegarty C, Bailey M. Hypoglycemia and outcome in critically ill patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:217–24. https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2009.0394.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, Blair D, Foster D, Dhingra V, Bellomo R, Cook D, Dodek P, Henderson WR, Hébert PC, Heritier S, Heyland DK, McArthur C, McDonald E, Mitchell I, Myburgh JA, Norton R, Potter J, Robinson BG, Ronco JJ. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1283–97. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0810625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schultz MJ, Harmsen RE, Korevaar JC, Abu-Hanna A, Van Braam Houckgeest F, Van Der Sluijs JP, Spronk PE. Adoption and implementation of the original strict glycemic control guideline is feasible and safe in adult critically ill patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:982–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellmann R. Personalised pharmacotherapy in intensive care unit patients. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2017;112:289–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-017-0284-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunner R, Adelsmayr G, Herkner H, Madl C, Holzinger U. Glycemic variability and glucose complexity in critically ill patients: a retrospective analysis of continuous glucose monitoring data. Crit Care. 2012;16:R175. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11657.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. van Hooijdonk RT, Winters T, Fischer JC, van Dongen-Lases EC, Krinsley JS, Preiser JC, Schultz MJ. Accuracy and limitations of continuous glucose monitoring using spectroscopy in critically ill patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2014;4:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-4-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ben Mohammadi L, Klotzbuecher T, Sigloch S, Welzel K, Goeddel M, Pieber TR, Schaupp L. Clinical performance of a low cost near infrared sensor for continuous glucose monitoring applied with subcutaneous microdialysis. Biomed Microdevices. 2015;17:73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-015-9983-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Macken L, Flower OJ, Bird S, Hammond N, Yarad E, Bass F, Fisher C, Strasma P, Finfer S. Continuous intra-arterial blood glucose monitoring using quenched fluorescence sensing in intensive care patients after cardiac surgery: phase II of a product development study. Crit Care Resusc. 2015;17:190–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Punke MA, Decker C, Wodack K, Reuter DA, Kluge S. Continuous glucose monitoring on the ICU using a subcutaneous sensor. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2015;110:360–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-014-0453-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wernerman J, Desaive T, Finfer S, Foubert L, Furnary A, Holzinger U, Hovorka R, Joseph J, Kosiborod M, Krinsley J, Mesotten D, Nasraway S, Rooyackers O, Schultz MJ, Van Herpe T, Vigersky RA, Preiser JC. Continuous glucose control in the ICU: report of a 2013 round table meeting. Crit Care. 2014;18:226. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13921.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Blixt C, Rooyackers O, Isaksson B, Wernerman J. Continuous on-line glucose measurement by microdialysis in a central vein. A pilot study. Crit Care. 2013;17:R87. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12713.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Finfer S, Wernerman J, Preiser JC, Cass T, Desaive T, Hovorka R, Joseph JI, Kosiborod M, Krinsley J, Mackenzie I, Mesotten D, Schultz MJ, Scott MG, Slingerland R, Van den Berghe G, Van Herpe T. Clinical review: consensus recommendations on measurement of blood glucose and reporting glycemic control in critically ill adults. Crit Care. 2013;17:229. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12537.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pardo S, Simmons DA. The quantitative relationship between ISO 15197 accuracy criteria and mean absolute relative difference (MARD) in the evaluation of analytical performance of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10(5):1182–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816644468.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kovatchev BP, Wakeman CA, Breton MD, Kost GJ, Louie RF, Tran NK, Klonoff DC. Computing the Surveillance Error Grid Analysis. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8(4):673–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296814539590.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1180–92. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f08a5b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sechterberger MK, van der Voort PH, Strasma PJ, DeVries JH. Accuracy of intra-arterial and subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring in postoperative cardiac surgery patients in the ICU. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;9:663–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296814564993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Munekage M, Yatabe T, Sakaguchi M, Kitagawa H, Tamura T, Namikawa T, Hanazaki K. Comparison of subcutaneous and intravenous continuous glucose monitoring accuracy in an operating room and an intensive care unit. J Artif Organs. 2016;19:159–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-015-0877-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kosiborod M, Gottlieb RK, Sekella JA, Peterman D, Grodzinsky A, Kennedy P, Borkon MA. Performance of the Medtronic Sentrino continuous glucose management (CGM) system in the cardiac intensive care unit. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2014;21:e000037. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gottschalk A, Welp HA, Leser L, Lanckohr C, Wempe C, Ellger B. Continuous glucose monitoring in patients undergoing extracorporeal ventricular assist therapy. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0148778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Polderman JA, Ma XL, Eshuis WJ, Hollmann MW, DeVries JH, Preckel B, Hermanides J. Efficacy of continuous intravenous glucose monitoring in perioperative glycaemic control: a randomized controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:264–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We obtained the study monitors free of charge from Edwards and Medtronic. We thank the nursing staff on the cardio-surgical ICU, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany for helping us to perform the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Punke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest, except MP, who is a member of the Medical Advisory Board of Radiometer Medical, Copenhagen, Denmark. No author or participant has any financial interest in the subject matter, materials or equipment discussed.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Punke, M.A., Decker, C., Petzoldt, M. et al. Head-to-head comparison of two continuous glucose monitoring systems on a cardio-surgical ICU. J Clin Monit Comput 33, 895–901 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0221-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0221-5

Keywords

Navigation