Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Melodic algorithms for pulse oximetry to allow audible discrimination of abnormal systolic blood pressures

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An anesthesiologist must remain vigilant of the patient’s clinical status, incorporating many independent physiological measurements. Oxygen saturation and heart rate are represented by continuous audible tones generated by the pulse oximeter, a mandated monitoring device. Other important clinical parameters—notably blood pressure—lack any audible representation beyond arbitrarily-configured threshold alarms. Attempts to introduce further continuous audible tones have apparently foundered; the complexity and interaction of these tones have exceeded the ability of clinicians to interpret them. Instead, we manipulate the tonal and rhythmic structure of the accepted pulse oximeter tone pattern melodically. Three melodic algorithms were developed to apply tonal and rhythmic variations to the continuous pulse oximeter tone, dependent on the systolic blood pressure. The algorithms distort the original audible pattern minimally, to facilitate comprehension of both the underlying pattern and the applied variations. A panel of anesthesia practitioners (attending anesthesiologists, residents and nurse anesthetists) assessed these algorithms in characterizing perturbations in cardiopulmonary status. Twelve scenarios, incorporating combinations of oxygen desaturation, bradycardia, tachycardia, hypotension and hypertension, were tested. A rhythmic variation in which additional auditory information was conveyed only at halftime intervals, with every other “beat” of the pulse oximeter, was strongly favored. The respondents also strongly favored the use of musical chords over single tones. Given three algorithms of tones embedded in the pulse oximeter signal, anesthesiologists preferred a melodic tone to signal a significant change in blood pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Craven RM, McIndoe AK. Continuous auditory monitoring—how much information do we register? Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:747–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Standards for basic anesthetic monitoring. Park Ridge, IL: American Society of Anesthesiologists; 2011.

  3. Santamore DC, Cleaver TG. The sounds of saturation. J Clin Monit Comput. 2004;18:89–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandra D, Tessler MJ, Usher J. Audio spectrum and sound pressure levels vary between pulse oximeters. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53:26–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nazir T, Beatty PC. Anaesthetists’ attitudes to monitoring instrument design options. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85:781–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Watson M, Sanderson P, Russell WJ. Tailoring reveals information requirements: the case of anaesthesia alarms. Interact Comput. 2004;16:271–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Loeb RG, Fitch WT. A laboratory evaluation of an auditory display designed to enhance intraoperative monitoring. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:362–8 (table of contents).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Man FR, Greuters S, Boer C, Veerman DP, Loer SA. Intra-operative monitoring—many alarms with minor impact. Anaesthesia 2013;68:804–10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harrison MJ, Connor CW. Statistics-based alarms from sequential physiological measurements. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:1015–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Connor CW, Gohil B, Harrison MJ. Triggering of systolic arterial pressure alarms using statistics-based versus threshold alarms. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:131–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. IEC, editor. International Standard IEC60601-1-8 (2005–08): medical electrical equipment, part 1–8: general requirements for safety—collateral standard: general requirements, tests and guidance for alarm systems in medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2005.

  12. Wee AN, Sanderson PM. Are melodic medical equipment alarms easily learned? Anesth Analg. 2008;106:501–8 (table of contents).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cage the Elephant (Musical group) and Copyright Collection (Library of Congress), [Cage the Elephant. Back against the wallmusic video], 2009.

  14. Connor CW. Pulse Oximetry Algorithms, Boston, MA 2013. Executable file for the Windows operating system. Available online at: http://www.mit.edu/~cwc/PulseOx.exe.

  15. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ. 1994;308:1552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests. 2: Predictive values. BMJ. 1994;309:102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by intradepartmental funds only. No external financial support was obtained.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

The authors declare that the experiments comply with the current laws of the United States of America, the country in which they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher W. Connor.

Additional information

The “supplementary material” refers to the software that we wrote that generates the auditory alarms described in the text, as shown in Fig. 2 and as cited in the references. The software may be obtained from this address: http://www.mit.edu/~cwc/PulseOx.exe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chima, R.S., Ortega, R. & Connor, C.W. Melodic algorithms for pulse oximetry to allow audible discrimination of abnormal systolic blood pressures. J Clin Monit Comput 28, 597–603 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9558-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9558-6

Keywords

Navigation