Skip to main content
Log in

Central Venous Pulse Pressure Analysis Using an R-Synchronized Pressure Measurement System

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective. The information derived from central venous catheters is underused. We developed an EKG-R synchronization and averaging system to obtained distinct CVP waveforms and analyzed components of these. Methods. Twenty-five paralyzed surgical patients undergoing CVP monitoring under mechanical ventilation were studied. CVP and EKG signals were analyzed employing our system, the mean CVP and CVP at end-diastole during expiration were compared, and CVP waveform components were measured using this system. Results. CVP waveforms were clearly visualized in all patients. They showed the a peak to be 1.8± 0.7 mmHg, which was the highest of three peaks, and the x trough to be lower than the y trough (−1.6± 0.7mmHgand-0.9± 0.5mmHg, respectively), with a mean pulse pressure of3.4mmHg.The difference between theme an CVP and CVP at end-diastole during expiration was0.58± 0.81 mmHg. Conclusions. The mean CVP can be used as an index of right ventricular preload in patients under mechanical ventilation with regular sinus rhythm. Our newly developed system is useful for clinical monitoring and for education in circulatory physiology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharkey SW. A guide to interpretation of hemodynamic data in the coronary care unit. Lippincott Williamas &Wilkins, 1997.

  2. Pittman JA, Ping JS, Mark JB: Arterial and central venous pressure monitoring. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2004; 42: 13-0.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drazner MH, Rame JE, Stevenson LW, Dries DL. Prognostic importance of elevated jugular venous pressure and a third heart sound in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 574-81.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ahrens TS, Schallom L. Comparison of pulmonary artery and central venous pressure waveform measurements via digital and graphic measurement methods. Heart Lung 2001; 30: 26-8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lundstedt JL. Comparison of methods of measuring pulmonary artery pressure. Am J Crit Care 1997; 6: 324-32.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mitchell MM, Meathe EA, Jones BR, Donch TE, Ricks WG, Benumof JL, Saidman LJ. Accurate, automated, continuously displayed pulmonary artery pressure measurement. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 294-00.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mackenzie J. The study of the pulse, arterial, venous, and hepatic, and of the movements of the heart. Edinburgh, Scotland: YJ. Pentland, 1902.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshihisa Fujita MD.

Additional information

This study was performed in the Department of Anesthesiology & ICM, Kawasaki Medical School.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fujita, Y., Hayashi, D., Wada, S. et al. Central Venous Pulse Pressure Analysis Using an R-Synchronized Pressure Measurement System. J Clin Monit Comput 20, 385–389 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-006-9035-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-006-9035-y

Keywords

Navigation