Abstract
Using a new semi-rigid tetradentate ligand and two cyanometalate building blocks with different steric hindrance, a Fe2Co triangular unit [(Tp)FeIII(CN)3]2CoII(bpmb)·2H2O [1; Tp = hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate; bpmb = 1,2-bis(3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl)benzenes] and a Fe2Co2 square unit {[(pzTp)FeIII(CN)3]2[CoII(bpmb)]2}·[(pzTp)FeIII(CN)3]2·4H2O [2; pzTp = tetrakis(pyrazolyl)borate] were synthesized via tunable assembly. Both compounds adopt cis arrangement because of the structural distorted semi-rigid bpmb. Tetranuclear square of 2 was formed due to larger steric hindrance building block of [(pzTp)FeIII(CN)3]− compared with [(Tp)FeIII(CN)3]− in trinculear 1. Magnetic measurements show that antiferromagnetic interactions dominate in 1 and 2. The fitting results of J values suggest a positive correlation between magnetic orbitals overlap of FeIII and CoII ions and Co–N≡C bond angles.
Graphical Abstract
Two cis arrangement cyanometalate [Fe-Co] clusters were synthesized via tunable assembly with a new semi-rigid tetradentate ligand. The tetranuclear cluster was formed because of larger steric hindrance of pzTp. Both compounds exhibit dominant antiferromagnetic couplings. The fitting results of J values suggest a positive correlation between magnetic orbitals overlap of FeIII and CoII ions and Co–N≡C bond angles.
Introduction
Rational design molecules assembly has always been a hot topic in coordination chemistry. In the research of molecule-based magnetic materials, cyano-bridged bimetallic assemblies have attracted considerable attention due to their predictable structures and fascinating magnetic properties [1,2,3,4]. In the meanwhile, it becomes an efficient way to control the nuclearity of complexes via introducing rigid ligands to occupy active sites of the metal centers in the heterobimetallic system [5,6,7,8,9]. Using this strategy, lots of compounds with cis or trans arrangement have been prepared, such as cis mode of trinuclear complexes [10] and trans mode of 1D chains [11]. In our previous work, the cis or trans arrangements of Fe2Cu complexes have been successfully controlled with different steric hindrance building blocks, wherein ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interactions dominate respectively [12]. We intend to control the nuclearity via tune the steric effect. Herein, a semi-rigid tetradentate ligand bpmb (1,2-bis(3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl)benzenes) was adopted to occupy the four coordination sites of the CoII center with two sites in cis position be vacant. The remained two cis sites were further linked by two building blocks with different steric effect. One trinuclear complex was obtained for building blocks with smaller steric hindrance [(Tp)FeIII(CN)3]− (Tp = hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate), whereas one tetranuclear compound was obtained for building block with larger steric hindrance effect [(pzTp)FeIII(CN)3]− (pzTp = tetrakis(pyrazolyl)borate). Both complexes were characterized by the spectroscopic, structural, and magnetic measurements. Our results provide an effective strategy to control the nuclearity and magnetic properties utilizing steric effect.
Experimental Section
Chemicals and Measurements
Unless the otherwise specified, materials were acquired from the suppliers and could be used with no in-depth purification. 1,2-bis(3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl)benzenes was synthesized according to method reported previously in the reference.
Synthesis of 1,2-bis(3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazol-1-ylmethyl)benzenes
The semi-rigid ligand bpmb was achieved by three steps (Scheme 1). A mixiture of 2-acetylpyridinc (12.1 g, 0.1 mol) and DMF-dimethylacetal (20 cm3) was refluxed in methol for 16 h. After concentration in vacuo, the resulting crude solid was recrystallised from CHC13. Then hydrazine hydrate (20 cm3) and ethanol (20 cm3) was added and stirred at 60 °C with stirring for 60 min. After addition of water (100 cm3) the resulting off-white precipitate was filtered off, dried and recrystallised from CH2C12-hexane to give 5.8 g (63%) of 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole. Element analysis, calculated for C8H7N3: C, 66.19; H, 4.86; N, 28.95%. Found: C, 66.57; H, 4.66; N, 28.73%. EIMS m/z 145 (M+). A mixture of 1,4-bis(bromomethyl)benzene (2.00 g, 7.60 mmol), 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole (2.43 g, 16.7 mmol), aqueous NaOH (10 M, 20 cm3), benzene (50 cm3) and Bu4NOH (40% aqueous solution, 1 drops) was heated to 80 °C for 24 h. Then the mixture was diluted with H2O (100 cm3) and the organic layer separated, dried over MgSO4, concentrated and purified by alumina column to give bpmb as a white solid (Yield: 1.34 g, 45%). Anal.Calcd for C24H20N6: C, 73.45; H, 5.14; N, 21.41%. Found: C, 73.34; H, 5.37; N, 21.39%. EIMS m/z 392 (M+).
Synthesis of Compounds [(Tp)FeIII(CN)3]2CoII(bpmb)·2H2O (1) and {[(pzTp)FeIII(CN)3]2[CoII(bpmb)]2}·[(pzTp)FeIII(CN)3]2·4H2O (2)
One triangular (1) and a tetranuclear (2) were synthesized by a diffusion method. The compounds 1 and 2 were synthesized by a diffusion method in an H-shaped tube. 4.0 mL methanol solution of 0.1 mmol (36.6 mg) of Co(ClO4)2·6H2O and 0.1 mmol (39.2 mg) of bpmb ligand were placed at the bottom in one side of an H-shaped tube, while 4.0 mL methanol solution of 0.2 mmol (117.8 mg) of Bu4N[(Tp)FeIII(CN)3] in the other side. Then 8.0 mL methanol solution was layered upon solutions of both sides to provide diffusion pathway. Crystallization took several weeks and gave red crystals of 1 in a yield of 35% based on Co(ClO4)2·6H2O. Anal.Calcd for C48H44B2CoFe2N24O2: C 48.80, H 3.75, N 28.46%; Found: C 48.71, H 3.69, N 28.34%. IR (solid KBr pellet ν/cm–1): 3422 br, 2925 w, 2532 w, 2122 s, 1634 s, 1618 s, 1534 m, 1384 s, 1270 w, 1203 m, 1161 s, 1066 s, 1042 s, 978 w, 902 m, 874 m, 771 s, 688 m. The preparation of compound 2 was carried out using 0.1 mmol (65.5 mg) Bu4N[(pzTp)FeIII(CN)3] instead of Bu4N[(Tp)FeIII(CN)3] and also gave red crystals in a yield of 43% based on Co(ClO4)2·6H2O. Anal.Calcd for C108H96B4Co2Fe4N56O4: C 49.38, H 3.68, N 29.86%; Found: C 49.34, H 3.59, N 29.82%. IR (solid KBr pellet ν/cm–1): 3411 br, 3129 m, 2937 m, 2529 m, 2151 s, 2115 s, 1623 s, 1543 s, 1387 s, 1314 w, 1204 s, 1151 w, 1069 s, 1055 s, 817 m, 783 s, 694 m.
Results and Discussion
Description of Crystal Structures
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis collected at 296 K reveals that 1 and 2 both crystallize in a monoclinic P21/c space group. The crystallographic data are presented in Table.S1. The selected bonds and angles are listed in Table.S2 (for compound 1) and Table. S3 (for compound 2).
As shown in Fig. 1a, the structure has a cyanide-bridged cis trinuclear core. Two crystallographically independent [(Tp)FeIII(CN)3]− units are linked to [CoII(bpmb)]2+ unit via cyanide bridges, forming a cis neutral [(Tp)FeIII(CN)3]2CoII(bpmb) trinulcear. Uncoordinated water molecules are located between the complexes. In the [(Tp)FeIII(CN)3]− units, each Fe center adopts a distorted octahedral geometry with a C3v symmetry. Coordination bond lengths of Fe1–C are in the range of 1.918(6)–1.928(7) Å, while those of Fe1–N are 1.976(5)–1.981(5) Å, respectively. The coordination environment of Fe2 ion is very similar to that of Fe1 center, and coordination bond lengths are 1.908(8)–1.916(6) Å and 1.969(5)–1.981(5) Å for Fe2–C and Fe2–N, respectively, in good agreement with those observed in other low-spin Fe (III) compounds [13, 14]. The Fe–C≡N linkages are close to linearity with bond angles of 173.4–177.4°. The Cobalt ion in [CoII(bpmb)]2+ unit is located in the octahedral environment with four nitrogen atoms from tetradentate bpmb and two cyanide nitrogen atoms from the bridging cyanide ions. The Co–Ncyanide bonds [2.083(5)–2.095(4) Å] are slightly shorter than the bpmb ones, which range from 2.116(4) to 2.196(4) Å. Three metal centers are in an approximate right angle with a Fe1···Co1···Fe2 angle of 87.2°, while the Co–N≡C bond angles are obviously deviate from linearity with the same bond angles of 160.5°, suggesting large steric hindrances occurred between the [(Tp)FeIII(CN)3]− and bpmb ligand. Each molecule then interacts with other adjacent molecule by π···π stacking between aromatic rings of the bpmb ligand at a centroid distance of 3.72 Å, thus forming a dimer structure (Figure. S1). The intramolecular Fe1···Co1, Fe2···Co1, and Fe1···Fe2 distances are 5.078(1), 5.034(2) and 6.972(1) Å, respectively, while the closest intermolecular Fe···Co, Co···Co, and Fe···Fe distances are 8.593(1), 7.825(1) and 11.748(2) Å, respectively, indicating the weak intermolecular magnetic interactions (Figure. S2).
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis show that compound 2 containing [(pzTp)FeIII(CN)3]− instead of [(Tp)FeIII(CN)3]−. This change increases the steric effect between the building blocks and adjacent bpmb ligand, leading to a larger Fe1···Co1···Fe2 angle of 92.7°, forming a centrosymmetrical tetranuclear square. The crystal structure consists of one discrete tetranuclear mixed metal unit, two [(pzTp)FeIII(CN)3]− anions, and four free water molecules. Two [(pzTp)FeIII(CN)3]− units are linked by two [CoII(bpmb)]2+ via bridging cyanide ions to form [2 + 2]-type discrete molecular square. Similar with 1, each Fe center adopts a slightly distorted octahedral geometry, formed by three N atoms from pzTp and three cyanide-carbon atoms. The Fe–C bond lengths are 1.904(5)–1.914(5) Å and the Fe–N distances are 1.951(5)–1.978(5) Å, respectively. The Co center employs the same coordination geometry with 1. In contrast, The Co–Ncyanide bonds [2.078(5)–2.079(5) Å] are slightly shorter while the Co–Nbpmb bonds are increased to 2.211(5) Å. Because of the larger steric building block [(pzTp)FeIII(CN)3]−, the Co–N≡C angle tends to be linear to 174.8°, making longer intramolecular Fe···Co and Fe···Fe distances of 5.149(1) and 7.058(1) Å. These values are similar to those observed in the related tetranuclear square compounds [15]. Weak intermolecular π···π interactions also formed between free [(pzTp)FeIII(CN)3]− anions (3.59 Å) and between adjacent bpmb ligands and free [(pzTp)FeIII(CN)3]− anions (3.42 Å), leading to a supramolecular chainlike structure along the c axis (Figure S3).
Magnetic Properties
Temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibilities for 1 and 2 were measured between 300 and 2 K under a dc field of 1000 Oe. The resulting plots of χT versus T for 1 were given in Fig. 2a. As shown in the figure, the χT value is 4.40 cm3 mol−1 K at room temperature, which is obviously larger than the spin-only value of χT = 2.9 cm3 mol−1 K for the two magnetically isolated low-spin FeIII (S = 1/2) and one magnetically isolated high-spin CoII (S = 3/2) assuming gFe = gCo = 2.0. The larger value probably due to the orbital contributions of Co center and afford g values to deviate significantly from 2.0 (normally ca. 2.5) [16]. Later it decreased gradually with lowering temperature and then abruptly dropped to 1.49 cm3 mol−1 K at T = 2 K. Such a magnetic behavior indicates the dominant antiferromagnetic couplings between the FeIII and CoII ions, which could be observed in other complexes exhibiting similar antiferromagnetic behaviors [17]. The Curie–Weiss law [ χT = C/ (T – θ)] is applied in the temperature range of 2–300 K to afford the Curie constant C = 4.70 cm3 mol−1 K and Weiss temperature θ = – 25.71 K. The negative Weiss temperature further suggests that antiferromagnetic interactions are dominant in the trinuclear complex. According to the distorted trinuclear structure, the magnetic data have been simulated with the MAGPACK program [18] based on an exchange Hamiltonian H = –2J1·SFe1·SCo1 –2J2·SFe2·SCo1, where J1 and J2 represent the exchange magnetic coupling constants between FeIII ions and CoII ions through the cyano-bridges. The best fitting results above 48 K give the J1 = –10.5 cm–1, J2 = –8.4 cm–1, g = 2.64 with the R = 1.37 × 10–4, which is consistent with other FeIII–CoII assemblies based on cyanometalate precursors [19]. The negative J value confirms the antiferromagnetic couplings dominate between FeIII and CoII ions. The M versus H dc data measured at 1.8 K shown in Figure. S4. As the applied magnetic field increased, the magnetization increased steeply and reached to 1.3 Nβ at 50 kOe. Ac susceptibility measurements were performed at various frequencies (Figure.S5) but no slow relaxation of the magnetization was detected above 2 K, leading to a fast quantum tunneling which may be due to the small energy gap between the ground and excited states [20].
The χT vs T data for 2 show the similar magnetic behavior and also suggest the antiferromagnetic couplings with 1. At 300 K, the χT value is 7.70 cm3 mol−1 K, corresponding to four low-spin FeIII ions and two high-spin CoII ions with g = 2.31. Firstly this curve gradually decreased to 6.92 cm3 mol−1 K at 65 K, then it sharply dropt and reached the minimum value of 4.11 cm3 mol−1 K at 2 K, indicting the dominant antiferromagnetic behavior. The Curie–Weiss law is also applied in the temperature range of 2–300 K to afford the Curie constant C = 7.93 cm3 mol−1 K and Weiss temperature θ = –8.72 K. The negative Weiss temperature further suggests the dominant antiferromagnetic interactions exist in the tetranuclear complex. The fitting results above 25 K of the magnetic data for 2 are similar with 1 and the best-fit parameters for χT vs T are J = –10.5 cm–1, g = 2.44 and R = 3.8 × 10–5. The large J value indicates the dominant antiferromagnetic interactions between FeIII and CoII ions. Further confirmation of the dominant antiferromagnetic couplings is obtained in the field-dependent magnetization at 1.8 K (Figure. S6) because the magnetization is 4.7 Nβ at 50 kOe, far from the saturated value of 6 Nβ (g = 2.0). No out-of-phase signal was observed in ac susceptibility studies above 2 K (Figure. S7), indicating the absence of SMM properties.
Both compounds exhibit cis arrangements due to the fact that large steric exclusion in the distorted [CoII(bpmb)]2+ unit prevents cyanide nitrogen atoms bridging the CoII center from opposite direction but with an approximate right angle. However, they still form structures with different nuclearities because of distinct steric hindrance of building blocks. In comparison, the Co–N≡C angle of compound 2 is larger than 1, the longer intramolecular Fe···Co and Fe···Fe distances lead to greater interspace between Fe centers, which is beneficial to the formation of square unit. On the other hand, the magnetic simulations were performed to discuss the correlations between structure and magnetic properties. As judged from the magnetic simulation data, the J value in compound 2 is larger than 1, which may be due to more linear Co–N≡C angle. It seems that the overlap degree of the magnetic orbitals between FeIII and CoII ions is positively relative to Co–N≡C bond angles. The larger orbitals overlap will result in the stronger FeIII–CN–CoII magnetic interactions [21].
Conclusions
In summary, a cyano-bridged Fe2Co triangular unit 1 and a Fe2Co2 square unit 2 were successfully synthesized via tunable assembly. The semi-rigid ligand bpmb adopts a distorted coordination configuration with Co center, leading to the cis arrangement of two compounds. At the same time, the larger steric exclusion of [(pzTp)FeIII(CN)3]− increases the Fe1···Co1···Fe2 angle, forming tetranuclear square of 2. The magnetic-structural correlations indicate a positive correlation exists between J values and the Co–N≡C bond angles. This strategy provides a feasible way in the tunable assembly process.
References
A. Dei (2005). Photomagnetic effects in polycyanometallate compounds: an intriguing future chemically based technology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 8, 1160–11633.
H. Miyasaka, N. Matsumoto, H. Ohkawa, N. Re, E. Gallo, and C. Floriani (1996). Complexes Derived from the Reaction of Manganese(III) Schiff Base Complexes and Hexacyanoferrate(III): Syntheses, Multidimensional Network Structures, and Magnetic Properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 981–994.
S. Wang, J. L. Zuo, S. Gao, Y. Song, H. C. Zhou, Y. Z. Zhang, and X. Z. You (2004). The Observation of Super paramagnetic Behavior in Molecular Nanowires. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 8900–8901.
J. H. Lim, J. H. Yoon, H. C. Kim, and C. S. Hong (2006). Surface Modification of a Six-Capped Body Centered Cube Ni9W6 Cluster: Structure and Single-Molecule Magnetism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 7424–7425.
T. Korzeniak, B. Nowicka, K. Stadnicka, W. Nitek, A. M. Majcher, and B. Sieklucka (2013). Construction of CN-bridged molecular squares employing penta-, hexa- and octa-coordinated metal ions. Polyhedron 52, 442–447.
Y. H. Li, Y. G. Min, S. Wang, J. L. Zuo, L. H. Wang, and W. Huang (2013). An unusual (3,4)-connected cubic-C3N4 type network constructed with [FeIII(Tp)(CN)3]– (Tp– = hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate). Cryst. Eng. Comm. 15, 3772–3775.
D. Y. Wu, Y. J. Zhang, W. Huang, and O. Sato (2010). An S = 3 cyanide-bridged tetranuclear FeIII2NiII2 square that exhibits slow relaxation of magnetization: synthesis, structure and magnetic properties. Dalton Trans. 39, 5500–5503.
Y. H. Peng, Y. F. Meng, L. Hu, Q. X. Li, Y. Z. Li, J. L. Zuo, and X. Z. You (2010). Syntheses, structures, and magnetic properties of heterobimetallic clusters with tricyanometalate and π-conjugated ligands containing 1,3-Dithiol-2-ylidene. Inorg. Chem. 49, 1905–1912.
H. Miyasaka, H. Takahashi, T. Madanbashi, K. Sugiura, R. Clerac, and H. Nojiri (2005). Cyano-Bridged MnIII3MIII (MIII = Fe, Cr) Complexes: Synthesis, Structure, and Magnetic Properties. Inorg. Chem. 44, 5969–5971.
D. F. Li, R. Clérac, S. Parkin, G. Wang, G. T. Yee, and S. M. Holmes (2006). An S = 2 cyanide-bridged trinuclear FeIII2NiII Single-Molecule. Magnet. Inorg. Chem. 45, 5251–5253.
A. R. Dieguez and E. Colacio (2007). Crystal structure and magnetic properties of [{Cu(cyclam)}3{Fe(CN)6}2]·6H2O, a cyano-bridged assembly with a rope-ladder chain structure. Polyhedron 26, 2859–2863.
P. F. Zhuang, L. Luo, T. Liu, Y. Luo, X. H. Xie, H. Zheng, L. Zhao, C. Q. Jiao, J. L. Wang, J. X. Hu, C. He, and C. Y. Duan (2014). Cyano-bridged Fe2Cu clusters: Control of magnetic properties through cis–trans arrangement. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 48, 8–11.
L. Cao, J. Tao, Q. Gao, T. Liu, Z. Xia, and D. Li (2014). Selective On/off at room temperature of a magnetic bistable Fe2Co2 complex with single crystal-to-single crystal transformation via intramolecular electron transfer. Chem. Commun. 50, 1665–1667.
J. X. Hu, Y. J. Zhang, Y. Xu, P. F. Zhuang, H. Zheng, L. Zhao, C. Q. Jiao, and T. Liu (2014). From tetranuclear cluster with single-molecule-magnet behavior to 1D alternating spin-canting chain in a Fe(III)–Mn(III) bimetallic system. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 47, 155–158.
M. Nihei, M. Ui, and H. Oshio (2009). Cyanide-bridged tri- and tetra-nuclear spin crossover complexes. Polyhedron 28, 1718–1721.
E. Pardo, M. Verdaguer, P. Herson, H. Rousselière, J. Cano, M. Julve, F. Lloret, and R. Lescouëzec (2011). Synthesis, crystal structures, and magnetic properties of a new family of heterometallic cyanide-bridged FeIII2MII2 (M = Mn, Ni, and Co) square complexes. Inorg. Chem. 50, 6250–6262.
Z. H. Zhang, A. L. Ni, and H. Z. Cui (2006). Kou, Heterometallic trinuclear CuM2 (M = Fe or Cr) complexes with novel bridges and unusual magnetic properties. New J. Chem. 30, 1327–1332.
J. J. Borrás-Almenar, J. M. Cle-mente-Juan, E. Coronado, and B. S. Tsukerblat (2001). MAGPACK1 A package to calculate the energy levels, bulk magnetic properties, and inelastic neutron scattering spectra of high nuclearity spin clusters. J. Comput. Chem. 22, 985–991.
D. F. Li, S. Parkin, G. B. Wang, G. T. Yee, A. V. Prosvirin, and S. M. Holmes (2005). Single-molecule magnets constructed from cyanometalates: {[Tp*FeIII(CN)3MII(DMF)4]2[OTf]2}·2DMF (MII = Co, Ni). Inorg. Chem. 44, 4903–4905.
Y. Z. Zhang, D. F. Li, R. Clérac, and S. M. Holmes (2013). A cyanido-bridged trinuclear FeIII2NiII complex decorated with organic radicals. Polyhedron 60, 110–115.
S. Wang, J. L. Zuo, H. C. Zhou, Y. Song, S. Gao, and X. Z. You (2004). Heterobimetallic complexes based on [(Tp)Fe(CN)3]–: syntheses, crystal structures and magnetic properties. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 18, 3681–3687.
Acknowledgements
This work was partly supported by the NSFC (No. 21701167) China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
10876_2022_2259_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Supplementary file1 Additional structure and selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (º) for compounds 1 and 2. CCDC-1426535 (for 1) and -1,426,536 (for 2) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif. (PDF 203 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yao, ND., Wang, XL., Wang, XQ. et al. Tunable Assembly and Magnetic Interactions in Two Cyano-bridged FeIII–CoII Bimetallic Complexes. J Clust Sci 34, 1157–1162 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-022-02259-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-022-02259-w