Abstract
Like other Germanic languages, Frisian has both strong and weak verbal inflection. Despite a strong diachronic tendency for change towards weak inflection, strong inflection patterns are available synchronically to speakers to form the past tense and past participle of new or nonce verbs. Using a measure for ‘potential productivity’ developed by Knooihuizen and Strik (Folia Linguist Hist 35:173–200, 2014) for Dutch, we investigate the relative strength of available patterns in Frisian in an elicitation and an acceptability judgment experiment. Despite the multitude of different patterns in the strong verbal inflection system, strong inflection makes up 35% of the elicited nonce forms; these forms cannot all be explained by analogy. Analogically formed strong inflections of nonce verbs receive relatively high acceptability ratings at 4.2 on a 7-point scale. The elicitation experiment also produced many weak forms (12% of participles) that are not normatively possible with the -e infinitives in the elicitation prompt. These alternative weak forms were not included in the acceptability judgment experiment. We discuss the experimental results in the context of diachronically attested language change in Frisian and of intensive language contact with Dutch.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bowern, Claire. 2013. Relatedness as a factor in language contact. Journal of Language Contact 6 (2): 411–432.
Breuker, Pieter. 2001. West Frisian in language contact. In Handbuch des Friesischen, ed. Horst Haider Munske, 121–129. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Campbell, Lyle, and Martha C. Muntzel. 1989. The structural consequences of language death. In Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death, ed. Nancy C. Dorian, 181–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, Ryan, Ragnar Svare, and Joseph Salmons. 2012. Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of German verbs. Journal of Historical Linguistics 2 (2): 153–172.
Clahsen, Harald. 1997. The representation of participles in the German mental lexicon: Evidence for the dual-mechanism model. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, ed. Geert Booij, and Jaap van Marle, 73–95. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cuskley, Christine F., Francesca Colaiori, Claudio Castellano, Vittorio Loreto, Martina Pugliese, and Francesca Tria. 2015. The adoption of linguistic rules in native and non-native speakers: Evidence from a Wug task. Journal of Memory and Language 84: 205–223.
Dammel, Antje. 2011. Konjugationsklassenwandel. Prinzipien des Ab-, Um-, und Ausbaus verbalflexivischer Allomorphie in germanischen Sprachen (Studia Linguistica Germanica 103). Berlin: De Gruyter.
de Haan, Germen J. 1997. Contact-induced changes in modern West Frisian. Us Wurk 46: 61–89.
De Backer, Lennert. 2013. Die Entwicklung der starken Verben in den nordgermanischen Sprachen: zugleich im Hinblick auf andere germanische Sprachen. Universiteit Gent MA thesis.
Dyk, Siebren. 2015. Strong and other irregular verbs. Taalportaal. http://taalportaal.org/taalportaal/topic/pid/topic-13998813312203318. Accessed 18 January 2016.
Dyk, Siebren. 2007. Jorwert breaking: A late Old West Frisian sound change. In Advances in Old Frisian philology, ed. Rolf H Bremmer Jr., Stephen Laker, and Oebele Vries, 91–128. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Eisma, Dick, and Jan Popkema. 2004. Tiidwurden. Ljouwert (Leeuwarden): Afûk.
Geerts, G., W. Haseryn, J. de Rooij, and M.C. van den Toorn. 1984. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
Gorter, Durk. 2001. Extent and position of West Frisian. In Handbuch des Friesischen, ed. Horst Haider Munske, 73–83. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Haverkamp, A.R., Arjen P. Versloot, and Hedde Zeijlstra. submitted. All you need is rules: A study on the relationship of markedness between two classes of Frisian regular verbs.
Heinsius, J. 1897. Klank- en buigingsleer van de taal des Statenbijbels. Groningen: Noordhoff.
Hilton, Nanna Haug, and Charlotte Gooskens. 2013. Language policies and attitudes towards Frisian in the Netherlands. In Phonetics in Europe: Perception and production, ed. Charlotte Gooskens, 139–157. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Hoekstra, Jarich F. 1998. Fryske wurdfoarming. Ljouwert (Leeuwarden): Fryske Akademy.
Jacobs, Neil G. 2005. Yiddish: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Knooihuizen, Remco, and Oscar Strik. 2014. Relative productivity potentials of Dutch verbal inflection patterns. Folia Linguistica Historica 35: 173–200.
Loopstra, J.J. 1937. It forkringen fen it imperf. briek ensf. troch de analogy-foarm brits ensf. yn it moderne Frysk. In Frysk Jierboek 1937, ed. P. Sipma, and J.H. Brouwer, 99–101. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Matras, Yaron. 2009. Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moder, Carol Lynn. 1992. Rules and analogy. In Explanation in historical linguistics, ed. Garry W. Davis, and Gregory K. Iverson, 179–191. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Nowak, Jessica. 2010. Im Spannungsfeld starker und schwacher Verben: zur Entstehung einer “8. Ablautreihe” im Deutschen, Niederländischen und Luxemburgischen. In Kontrastive Germanische Linguistik, vol. 2, ed. Antje Dammel, Sebastian Kürschner, and Damaris Nübling, 429–472. Hildesheim: Olms.
Nowak, Jessica. 2015. Zur Legitimation einer 8. Ablautreihe: Eine kontrastive Analyse zu ihrer Entstehung im Deutschen, Niederländischen und Luxemburgischen. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
Pijpops, Dirk, Katrien Beuls, and Freek Van de Velde. 2015. The rise of the verbal weak inflection in Germanic: An agent-based model. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal 5: 81–102.
Ragnarsdóttir, Hrafnhildur, Hanne Gram Simonsen, and Kim Plunkett. 1999. The acquisition of past tense morphology in Icelandic and Norwegian children: An experimental study. Journal of Child Language 26 (3): 577–618.
Seebold, Elmar. 1970. Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen starken Verben. Den Haag: Mouton.
Siegel, Jeff. 2001. Koine formation and creole genesis. In Creolization and contact, ed. Norval Smith, and Tonjes Veenstra, 175–197. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Strik, Oscar. 2014. Stability and change in strong verb inflection between Old and Early Modern Frisian. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 73: 449–496.
Strik, Oscar. 2015. Modelling analogical change: A history of Swedish and Frisian verb inflection. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen dissertation.
Stump, Gregory. 2015. Inflectional paradigms: Content and form at the syntax-morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swarte, Femke, and Nanna Haug Hilton. 2013. Mutual intelligibility between speakers of North and West Frisian. In Phonetics in Europe: Perception and production, ed. Charlotte Gooskens, 281–302. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Thomason, Sarah Grey. 2010. Contact explanations in linguistics. In The handbook of language contact, ed. Raymond Hickey, 31–47. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
van den Berg, B. 1957. De ie van bedierf, stierf, wierf, wierp en zwierf. Taal & Tongval 9: 75–84.
van der Veen, Klaas F. 2001. West Frisian dialectology and dialects. In Handbuch des Friesischen, ed. Horst Haider Munske, 98–116. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Knooihuizen, R., Strik, O.A.O. & de Jong, G. Frisian strong and weak verbs in the face of Dutch influence: a synchronic and experimental approach. J Comp German Linguistics 21, 57–74 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-018-9094-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-018-9094-8