Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development of a Japanese Version of the Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of a study on the development of a Japanese version of the Selection, Optimization, and Compensation (SOC) questionnaire using the Rasch model. To estimate the item functions of 12 items in each of the 4 subscales, 340 responses to the initial survey and 280 responses to the retest survey conducted 7 weeks later were obtained from Japanese older adults. Item fit information, item-total correlations, and stability of item difficulties were used to select the appropriate items in each subscale. Test-retest and internal consistency reliability were found to be optimal in all of the refined subscales. These subscales were related to internal control, subjective well-being, and personality traits, but not to social desirability. Thus, the psychometric properties of this Japanese SOC questionnaire were verified. This study also indicated the possibility of using the Rasch model to refine the SOC questionnaire in other cultural settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrosi-Randic, N., & Plavsic, M. (2011). Strategies for goal-achievement in older people with different levels of well-being. Studia Psychologica, 53, 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 4, 366–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B., Baltes, M. M., Freund, A. M., & Lang, F. (1999). The measurement of selection, optimization, and compensation (SOC) by self-report: technical report 1999. Berlin: Max-Planck Institute for Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, M. F. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, K.-L., & Chi, I. (2001). Selection, optimization, and compensation questionnaire: a validation study with Chinese older adults. Clinical Gerontologist, 24, 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crown, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (1998). Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. Psychology and Aging, 13, 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2002). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization, and compensation: measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 642–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gestsdottir, S., Bowers, E., von Eye, A., Napolitano, C. M., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). Intentional self regulation in middle adolescence: the emerging role of loss-based selection in positive youth development. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 39, 764–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamahara, M., Higuchi, K., & Shimizu, N. (1982). Locus of control shakudo no sakusei to, shinraisei, datousei no kentou [Development of a Japanese scale of locus control through an examination of validity and reliability]. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 302–307. Kyoikushinrigakukenkyu.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, T., & Suzuki, C. (1986). Nihongoban social desirability scale Ni Tsuite [Japanese version of the social desirability scale]. Japanese Journal of Social Psychiatry, 9, 173–180. Shakaiseishinigaku.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, J. (1984). Dimensions of the life satisfaction index A: a structural formulation. Journal of Gerontology, 39, 613–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, M. (2010). A user’s guide to Winsteps®: Rasch-model computer programs. Retrieved from http://www.winstep.com.

  • Namikawa, T., Tani, I., Wakita, T., Nakane, A., & Noguchi, H. (2009). Big-five tanshukuban no sakusei: inshitekidatousei no kentou (3) [development of a short form for the Big five scale (3): examination of factorial validity]. Proceedings of the Japanese Psychological Conference, 73, 19. Nihonshinrigakkaitaikaishouroku.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugarten, B., Havighurst, R., & Tobin, S. (1961). The measurement of satisfaction. Journal of Gerontology, 16, 134–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, M. W., Kohout, F. J., & Wallace, R. B. (1985). Depression among the rural elderly: a study of prevalence and correlates. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173, 582–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okabayashi, H. (2010a). Chukounen no shougaihattatsu nitsuiteno daiyoji tsuiseki chousa chousahoukokusho [the fourth follow-up survey on life span development for older adults: technical report]. Unpublished manuscript. Tokyo, Japan: Department of Psychology, Meisei University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okabayashi, H. (2010b). Development of a Japanese version of the SOC questionnaire. Poster session presented at the 118th convention of the American Psychological Association, San Diego, CA.

  • Okabayashi, H. (2012). Cultural comparison of item difficulty in the SOC scale between Japan and Germany by using the Rasch model. Poster session presented at the 22nd biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development, Edmonton, Canada.

  • Okabayashi, H., Liang, J., Krause, N., Akiyama, H., & Sugisawa, H. (2004). Mental health among older adults in Japan: Do sources of social support and negative interaction make a difference? Social Science & Medicine, 59, 2259–2270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. L., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1991). Adjective check list scales and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 630–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokyo Metopolitan Institute of Gerontology & Institute of Gerontology of the University of Michigan (1987). Zenkoku Koureisha Chousa Chousahyo [Questionnaire for a national representative sample of Japanese older adults.] Unpublished manuscript, Central Research Service.

  • Viglund, K., Aléx, L., Jonsén, E., Lundman, B., Norberg, A., Fischer, R. S., Standberg, G., & Nygren, B. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the selection, optimization, compensation questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 27, 460–467. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01027.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wada, S. (1996). Seikakutokuseiyougo wo mochiita Big five shakudo no sakusei [construction of the Big five scale of personality traits and its concurrent validity with the NPI]. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 67, 61–67. Shinrigakukenkyu.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yatomi, N., Liang, J., Krause, N., & Akiyama, H. (1993). CES-D niyoru Nihon roujin no utsu shoujou no sokutei: sono inshi kouzou niokeru bunkasa no kentou [cross-cultural differences in depressive symptoms among the aged: comparisons of the factor structure of CES-D]. Social Gerontology, 37, 37–47. Shakai Ronengaku.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank all the research participants and the students who assisted with data collection.

Funding

This study was funded by Meisei University and a Grant-in-Aid for Science Research (C 21530700) from Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.

Presentations

Portions of this work were presented at the 118th Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Diego, CA, 2010, and at the 22nd biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development, Edmonton, Canada, 2012.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Meisei University, 2-1-1 Hodokubo, Hino-City, Tokyo, 191-8506, Japan

    Hideki Okabayashi

Authors
  1. Hideki Okabayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideki Okabayashi.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 5 List of Items on the Selection, Optimization, and Compensation (SOC) Questionnaire
Full size table

Appendix 2

Table 6 Psychometric properties of items in the Elective selection (ES) subscale
Full size table
Table 7 Psychometric properties of items in the Loss-based selection (LBS) subscale
Full size table
Table 8 Psychometric properties of items in the Optimization (O) subscale
Full size table
Table 9 Psychometric properties of items in the Compensation (C) subscale
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okabayashi, H. Development of a Japanese Version of the Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire. J Cross Cult Gerontol 29, 447–465 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-014-9242-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-014-9242-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation