Skip to main content
Log in

Preimplantation genetic testing using Karyomapping for a paternally inherited reciprocal translocation: a case study

  • Genetics
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) using Karyomapping is used to screen embryos for single gene disorders prior to implantation. While Karyomapping is not designed to screen for abnormalities in chromosome copy number, this testing is based upon a genome-wide analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and, as such, some chromosome abnormalities are detected. The aim of this study was to validate whether Karyomapping could provide reliable and accurate PGT for a paternal 46,XY,t(10;19)(p15;p13.3) reciprocal translocation.

Methods

Feasibility/validation for PGT was performed using DNA from the couple, as well as DNA from the paternal parents and from a previous unbalanced pregnancy. Karyomapping was performed using Illumina’s HumanKaryomap-12 BeadChip microarray technology. SNP analysis was performed using BlueFuse Multi software (Illumina). Transmission of the translocation was assessed through the analysis of SNP markers on the chromosome regions of interest.

Results

PGT-SR was determined to be feasible as chromosomal SNP analysis could reliably distinguish normal/balanced outcomes from all unbalanced outcomes. The couple transferred a normal/balanced embryo in an elective single embryo transfer procedure following 2 IVF/PGT-SR cycles. A clinical pregnancy was achieved.

Conclusion

This is the first report of PGT-SR test validation using Karyomapping for a 46,XY,t(10;19)(p15;p13.3) reciprocal translocation. Karyomapping may offer a means of detecting unbalanced forms of chromosome rearrangements when other PGT platforms fail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katz MG, Fitzgerald L, Bankie A, Savulescu J, Cram DS. Issues and concerns of couples presenting for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:1117–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Handyside AH, Harton GL, Mariani B, Thornhill AR, Affara N, Shaw MA, et al. Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes. J Med Genet. 2010;47:651–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Natesan S, Bladon A, Coskun S, Qubbaj W, Prates R, Munne S, et al. Genome-wide karyomapping accurately identifies the inheritance of single-gene defects in human preimplantation embryos in vitro. Genet Med. 2014;16:838–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Griffin D, Gould R. What is Karyomapping and where does it fit in the world of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)? Med Res Arch. 2017;5(6):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cuman C, Beyer CE, Brodie D, Fullston T, Lin JI, Willats E, et al. Defining the limits of detection for chromosome rearrangements in the preimplantation embryo using next generation sequencing. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(8):1566–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A technical guide to Karyomapping – phasing single gene defects. Illumina; 2015.

  7. Infinium Karyomapping Assay Protocol Guide. 2015.

  8. Kuliev A, Verlinsky O, Rechitsky S. Safety, accuracy and reproductive outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. J IVF Reprod Med Genet. 2013;1:116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Natesan S, Handyside A, Thornhill C, Ottolini K, Sage M, Summers M, et al. Live birth after PGD with confirmation by a comprehensive approach (Karyomapping) for simultaneous detection of monogenic and chromosomal disorders. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;29:600–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sarasa J, Wheeler K, Lansdowne L, Raberi A, Babariya D, Wells D. Clinical experience using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of chromosomal translocations. Conferene paper P-658. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:403.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Giménez C, Sarasa J, Arjona C, Vilamajó E, Martínez-Pasarell O, Wheeler K, et al. Karyomapping allows preimplantation genetic diagnosis of a de-novo deletion undetectable using conventional PGD technology. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;31(6):770–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stock-Myer S, Twomey A, Tang P, Kohfahl A, Martic M. PGD for reciprocal translocation and CNVs using Karyomapping. Australian Society of Diagnostic Genomics Abstract, 2017.

  13. Colls P, Escudero T, Fischer J, Cekleniak NA, Ben-Ozer S, Meyer B, et al. Validation of array comparative genome hybridization for diagnosis of translocations in preimplantation human embryos. Reprod BioMed Online. 2012;24(6):621–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lai H, Chuang T, Wong L, Lee M, Hsieh C, Wang H, et al. Identification of mosaic and segmental aneuploidies by next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic screening can improve clinical outcomes compared to array-comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Cytogenet. 2017;10:14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Vera-Rodriguez M, Michel C, Mercader A, Bladon A, Rodrigo L, Kokocinski F, et al. Distribution patterns of segmental aneuploidies in human blastocysts identified by next-generation sequencing. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):1047–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the staff at Monash IVF clinic for referring and coordinating the couple and the genetics staff at Monash IVF for their genetic analysis and contributions towards this paper.

Authors’ roles

Claire E Beyer—case study concept and design, data acquisition, study execution, analysis, manuscript drafting, interpretation of data.

Amy Lewis—data acquisition, study execution, analysis, manuscript drafting, interpretation of data.

Elissa Willats—Manuscript drafting, interpretation of data.

Jayne Mullen—Manuscript review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. E. Beyer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beyer, C.E., Lewis, A., Willats, E. et al. Preimplantation genetic testing using Karyomapping for a paternally inherited reciprocal translocation: a case study. J Assist Reprod Genet 36, 951–963 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01413-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01413-0

Keywords

Navigation