Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of prolonged face mask use on ocular surface health during COVID-19 pandemic: a clinical, and conjunctiva impression cytology study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the relationship between prolonged face mask use and ocular surface health utilizing conjunctival impression cytology, the Schirmer test, the tear break-up time (TBUT) test, and the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire.

Methods

In this cross-sectional prospective study, individuals who used face masks for at least eight hours per day for at least six months were compared to healthy volunteers who used face masks for no more than one hour per day. Each participant completed an OSDI questionnaire. The Schirmer test (under anesthesia), the TBUT test, and conjunctiva impression cytology analysis according to the Nelson classification method were performed on each participant.

Results

This study included 102 (49 male, 53 female) face mask users with an average age of 33.29 ± 7.71 years and 110 (60 male, 50 female) healthy controls with an average age of 32.96 ± 7.10 years (p = 0.746). The total OSDI score was significantly higher in face mask users than the control group (25.18 ± 3.54 vs 9.46 ± 2.13, p < 0.001). The mean Schirmer test value and TBUT were significantly lower in the study group than the control group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in total score and stage of the Nelson classification system (p < 0.001, and p = 0.024, respectively). All conjunctiva impression cytology assessments, including cellularity, cell–cell contact, nucleus/cytoplasma ratio, goblet cell amount, and metaplasia, revealed statistically significant deterioration in the study group compared to the control group (p < 0.001, p = 0.025, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

The prolonged use of face masks leads to dry eyes. The findings of conjunctiva impression cytology indicate the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of mask associated dry eye.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Labbé A, Brignole-Baudouin F, Baudouin C (2007) Ocular surface investigations in dry eye. J Fr Ophtalmol 30:76–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lemp MA (1995) Report of the national eye institude/industry workshop on clinical trials in dry eyes. CLAO J 21:221–232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stern ME, Beuerman RW, Fox RI, Gao J, Mircheff AK, Pflugfelder SC (1998) The pathology of dry eye: the interaction between the ocular surface and lacrimal glands. Cornea 17:584–589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The definition and classification of dry eye disease (2007) report of the definition and classification subcommittee of the international dry eye workshop. Ocul Surf 5:75–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zoukhri D (2006) Effect of inflammation on lacrimal gland function. Exp Eye Res 82:885–898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Narayanan S, Miller WL, McDermott AM (2006) Conjunctival cytokine expression in symptomatic moderate dry eye subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:2445–2450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Murube J, Rivas L (2003) Impression cytology on conjunctiva and cornea in dry eye patients establishes a correlation between squamous metaplasia and dry eye clinical severity. Eur J Ophthalmol 13:115–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moshirfar M, West WB Jr, Marx DP (2020) Face mask-associated ocular irritation and dryness. Ophthalmol Ther 9:397–400

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chadwick O, Lockington D (2021) Addressing post-operative mask-associated dry eye (MADE). Eye (Lond) 35:1543–1544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. White DE (2020) MADE: a new coronavirus-associated eye disease. https://www.healio.com/news/ophthalmology/20200622/blog-a-new-coronavirusasso/ 2020 Accessed 15 Nov 2021

  11. Egbert PR, Lauber S, Maurice DM (1977) A simple conjunctival biopsy. Am J Ophthalmol 84:798–801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nelson DJ, Havener VR, Cameron D (1976) Cellulose asetate impression cytology of the ocular surface: dry eye state. Arch Ophthalmol 101:1869–1872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baris ME, Yilmaz SG, Palamar M (2022) Impact of prolonged face mask wearing on tear break-up time and dry eye symptoms in health care professionals. Int Ophthalmol 42:2141–2214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bilici S, Toprak A, Buyukuysal C, Ugurbas SH (2022) The effect of day-long mask wearing on non-invasive break-up time. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 26:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  15. Giannaccare G, Pellegrini M, Borselli M, Senni C, Brono A, Scorcia V (2022) Diurnal changes of noninvasive parameters of ocular surface in healthy subjects before and after continuous face mask wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Rep 12:e12998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krolo I, Blazeka M, Merdzo I, Vrtar I, Sabol I, Petric-Vickovic I (2021) Mask-associated dry eye during COVID-19 pandemic-how face masks contribute to dry eye disease symptoms. Med Arch 74:144–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D’Souza S, Vaidya T, Nair AP, Shetty R, Kumar NR, Bisht A, Panigrahi T et al (2022) Altered ocular surface health status and tear film immune profile due to prolonged daily mask wear in health care workers. Biomedicines 10:e1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scalinci SZ, Pacella E, Battagliola ET (2021) Prolonged face mask use might worsen dry eye symptoms. Indian J Ophthalmol 69:1508–1510

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL (2000) Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol 118:615–621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mastropasqua L, Lanzini M, Brescia L, D’Aloisio R, Nubile M, Ciancaglini M, D’Amoria C et al (2021) Face-mask related ocular surface modifications during COVID-19 pandemic: a clinical, in vivo confocal microscopy, and immune cytology study. Transl Vis Sci Technol 10:e22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mastropasqua L, Nubile M, Lanzini M, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Pannellini T, Nicola DM, Dua HS (2006) Epithelial dendritic cell distribution in normal and inflamed human cornea: in vivo confocal microscopy study. Am J Ophthalmol 142:736–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brignole-Baudouin F, Riancho L, Ismail D, Deniaud M, Amrane M, Baudouin C (2017) Correlation between the inflammatory marker HLADR and signs and symptoms in moderate to severe dry eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 58:2438–2448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mastropasqua R, Agnifili L, Fasanella V, Curcio C, Brescia L, Lanzini M, Fresina M, Mastropasqua L, Marchini G (2015) Corneoscleral limbus in glaucoma patients: in vivo confocal microscopy and immunocytological study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:2050–2058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tseng SC, Hirst LW, Maumenee AE, Kenyon KR, Sun TT, Green WR (1984) Possible mechanisms for the loss of goblet cells in mucin-deficient disorders. Ophthalmology 91:545–552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rhee MSM, Lindquist CD, Silvestrini MT, Chan AC, Ong JJY, Sharma VK (2021) Carbon dioxide increases with face masks but remains below short-term NIOSH limits. BMC Infect Dis 21:e354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Park SR, Han J, Yeon YM, Kang NY, Kim E (2021) Effect of face mask on skin characteristics changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Skin Res Technol 27:554–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Niesert AC, Oppel EM, Nellessen T, Frey S, Clanner-Engelshofen BM, Wollenber A, French LE, Reinholz M (2021) “Face mask dermatitis” due to compulsory facial masks during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: data from 550 health care and non-health care workers in German. Eur J Dermatol 31:199–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Each author declares that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by SK, FB, and ASK. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SK, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumeyra Koprubasi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Each author declares that there is no conflict of interest on this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koprubasi, S., Basar, F. & Senel Kukner, A. The impact of prolonged face mask use on ocular surface health during COVID-19 pandemic: a clinical, and conjunctiva impression cytology study. Int Ophthalmol 44, 59 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-02990-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-02990-5

Keywords

Navigation