Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of measurement methods of posterior inflammation in stromal choroiditis: the value of quantitative outcome measures versus the presently qualitatively based paradigm

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess posterior inflammation using a fluorescein (FA)/indocyanine-green angiography (ICGA) scoring system, and compare them to the presently recommended outcome measure, the standardization of uveitis nomenclature vitreous haze score (SUN-VH) in stromal choroiditis.

Methods

This was a retrospective study on patients with a diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis(OS), ocular tuberculosis(OT), Birdshot retinochoroiditis(BRC) and Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease(VKH) seen in the Centre for Ophthalmic Specialized Care, Lausanne, Switzerland. Angiography signs were quantified according to an established FA/ICGA scoring system. Vitritis was assessed using SUN-VH. Results were compared.

Results

65 newly diagnosed patients (128 eyes) with stromal choroiditis were included. Angiographic scoring showed variable degrees of choroidal versus retinal involvement (87% for OS, 72% for OT, 62.5% for BRC and 100% for VKH). On the other hand, a mere 22 of 128 eyes (17%) showed a SUN-VH score ≥ 2 necessary for inclusion in clinical trials. Moreover, FA/ICGA values followed a normal distribution curve and presented inter-examiner variations greater than 1-SD in only 8.4% of cases. SUN-VH values’ distribution was non-normal and showed inter-examiner discrepancies greater than 1-SD in 51.7% of cases.

Conclusion

This study highlights the precise measurement of global posterior inflammation achieved by a dual FA/ICGA scoring system in stromal choroiditis. In contrast, SUN-VH scale appears imprecise and inadequate, as only a minute percentage of the studied eyes could have been included in a clinical trial based on this criterion. To evaluate posterior intraocular inflammation meaningfully in stromal choroiditis, the use of dual FA/ICGA is strongly advised and should replace the presently recommended SUN-VH system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herbort CP, Tugal-Tutkun I (2017) The importance of quantitative measurement methods for uveitis: laser flare photometry endorsed in Europe while neglected in Japan where the technology measuring quantitatively intraocular inflammation was developed. Int Ophthalmol 37(3):469–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0253-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moballeghi M, Moghaddam GG (2008) How do we measure use of scientific journals? A note on research methodologies. Scientometrics 76(1):125–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1901-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mol BW, Lijmer GJ, Evers JL, Bossuyt PM (2003) Characteristics of good diagnostic studies. In: Seminars in reproductive medicine, vol 21, pp. 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-39991

  4. Forrester JV, Okada AA, BenEzra D, Ohno S (1998) Posterior segment intraocular inflammation guidelines, 1998-10-05/90-6299-167-X

  5. Tugal-Tutkun II, Herbort CP, Khairallah M, Angiography Scoring for Uveitis Working Group (ASUWOG) (2008) Scoring of dual fluorescein and ICG inflammatory angiographic signs for the grading of posterior segment inflammation (dual fluorescein and ICG angiographic scoring system for uveitis), Int Ophthalmol. 30(5): 539–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-008-9263-x

  6. Bouchenaki N, Herbort CP (2005) Stromal Choroiditis. In: Krieglstein GK, Weinreb RN, Pleyer U, Mondino B (eds) Uveitis and Immunological Disorders. Essentials in Ophthalmology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van Tran T, Auer C, Guex-Crosier Y et al (1994) Epidemiological characteristics of uveitis in Switzerland. Int Ophthalmol 18:293. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cimino L, Herbort CP, Aldigeri R et al (2009) Tuberculous uveitis, a resurgent and underdiagnosed disease. Int Ophthalmol 29:67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-007-9071-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Herbort Hr CP, Pavésio C, LeHoang P, Bodaghi B, Fardeau C, Kestelyn P, Neri P (2017) Why birdshot retinochoroiditis should rather be called “HLA-A29 uveitis”. Br J Ophthalmol 101(7):851–855. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abu El-Asrar AM, Hemachandran S, Al-Mezaine HS, Kangave D, Al-Muammar AM (2012) The outcome of mycophenolate mofetil therapy combined with systemic corticosteroids in acute uveitis associated with Kogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Acta Ophthalmol 90:e603–e608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Faiz IS (2015) Ocular tuberculosis: current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol 2015(9):2223–2227. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s65254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krassas N, Wells J, Bell C, Woodhead M, Jones N (2018) Presumed tuberculosis-associated uveitis: rising incidence and widening criteria for diagnosis in a non-endemic area. Eye (Lond) 32(1):87–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2017.152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Herbort CPI, Rao NA, Mochizuki M, members of Scientific Committee of First International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (2017) In: International criteria for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis: results of the first International Workshop On Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS). Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 17(3):160–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273940902818861

  14. Nussenblatt RB, Palestine AG, Chan CC et al (1985) Standardization of vitreal inflammatory activity in intermediate and posterior uveitis. Ophthalmology 92:467–471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jabs DA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT (2005) Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group. Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the First International Workshop. Am J Ophthalmol 140:509–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Herbort CPI, LeHoang P, Guex-Crosier Y (1998) Schematic interpretation of indocyanine green angiography in posterior uveitis using a standard angiographic protocol. Ophthalmology 105(3):432–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tugal-Tutkun I, Herbort CP, Khairallah M, Mantovani A (2010) Interobserver agreement in scoring of dual fluorescein and ICG inflammatory angiographic signs for the grading of posterior segment inflammation. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 18:385–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis JL (2010) Scale for photographic grading of vitreous haze in uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 150(5):637–641

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. P. Herbort Jr..

Ethics declarations

Human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gillmann, K., El Ameen, A., Massy, R. et al. Assessment of measurement methods of posterior inflammation in stromal choroiditis: the value of quantitative outcome measures versus the presently qualitatively based paradigm. Int Ophthalmol 39, 1567–1574 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0979-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0979-y

Keywords

Navigation