Abstract
In fission-fusion societies, in which animals from the same group may spend long periods of time apart from each other, individuals could use long-distance vocalizations to maintain contact with others. This could be achieved with vocalizations that simply carried information about the caller's identity and location. I explored this possibility using observations and experiments from a 3-year field study of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) in Punta Laguna, México, analyzing the use of the species' most frequent vocalization, the whinny. By following 2 subgroups simultaneously, I found that subgroups that were within the active space of the whinny approached each other more often than subgroups that were farther apart. Individual adults in these subgroups also emitted more whinnies when they were within hearing range of another subgroup than when farther apart. I used a paired playback design to determine whether whinnies could influence the behavior of close associates as opposed to nonassociated individuals. Although nonassociates were as likely as close associates to respond vocally to playbacks of whinnies, only a close associate ever approached the speaker. Collectively, the results suggest that whinnies are used by spider monkeys to achieve flexibility in spacing while maintaining specific social relationships.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boinski, S. (1991). The coordination of spatial position: a field study of the vocal behavior of adult female squirrel monkeys. Anim. Behav. 41: 89–102.
Butterfield, P. A. (1970). The pair bond in the zebra finch. In Social behavior in birds and mammals. New York, Academic Press, Crook, J. H. (Ed.).
Chapman, C. A. (1990). Association patterns of spider monkeys: the influence of ecology and sex on social organization. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 409–414.
Chapman, C. A., and Lefebvre, L. (1990). Manipulating foraging group size: spider monkey food calls at fruiting trees. Anim. Behav. 39: 891–896.
Chapman, C. A., and Weary, D. M. (1990). Variability in spider monkey's vocalizations may provide basis for individual recognition. Am. J. Primatol. 22: 279–284.
Dittus, W. P. J. (1988). An analysis of toque macaque cohesion calls from an ecological perspective. In Primate vocal communication. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Todt, et al (eds.).
Eisenberg, J. F. (1976). Communication mechanisms and social integration in the black spider monkey, Ateles fusciceps robustus, and related species. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 213.
Goodall, J. (1968). The behavior of free-living chimpanzees in the Gombe stream Reserve. Anim. Behav. Monographs 1: 165–311.
Green, S. (1975). Variation of vocal pattern with social situation in the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata): a field study. In Primate Behavior. New York: Academic Press, LA Rosenblum (ed.).
Hauser, M. D. (1996). The Evolution of Communication. MIT Press, Boston.
Heinrich, B., and Marzluff, J. M. (1991). Do common ravens yell because they want to attract others? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 13–21.
Kummer, H. (1968). Social organization of hamadryas baboons. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kruuk, H. (1972). The spotted hyena: a study of predation and social behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
McComb, K., Moss, C., Sayialel, S., and Baker, L. (2000). Unusually extensive networks of vocal recognition in African elephants. Anim. Behav. 59: 1103–1109.
Mitani, J. C. (1996). Comparative studies of African ape vocal Behavior. In Great Ape Societies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L. F., and Nishida, T. (eds.).
Mitani, J. C., and Nishida, T. (1993). Contexts and social correlates of long distance calling by male chimpanzees. Anim. Behav. 45: 735–746.
Poole, J. H., Payne, K., Langbauer, W. R. Jr., and Moss C. (1988). The social contexts of some very low frequency calls of African elephants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22: 385–392.
Ramos-Fernández, G. (2001). Patterns of association, feeding competition and vocal communication in spider monkeys, Ateles geoffroyi. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Ramos-Fernández, G., and Ayala-Orozco, B. (2002). Population size and habitat use of spider monkeys in Punta Laguna, Mexico. In: Primates in Fragments: Ecology and Conservation. Kluwer/Plenum Press, New York, Marsh L. K. (eds.).
Robinson, J. G. (1982). Vocal systems regulating within-group spacing. In Primate Communication, Cambridge University Press, Snowdon, C. T., Brown, C. H., and Petersen M. (eds.), Cambridge.
van Roosmalen, M. G. M., and Klein, L. L. (1987). The spider monkeys, Genus Ateles. In Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates. World Wide Fund, Washington, Mittermeier R. A., and Rylands A. B. (eds.).
Smith, W. J. (1977). The Behavior of Communicating. Harvard University Press.
Smolker, R., Richards, A. F., Connor, R. C., and Pepper, J. W. (1992). Sex differences in patterns of association among Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins. Behavior 123: 38–29.
Symington, M. M. (1987). Ecological and social correlates of party size in the black spider monkey, Ateles paniscus chamek. PhD. thesis, Princeton University.
Teixidor, P., and Byrne, R. W. (1997). Can spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) discriminate vocalizations of familiar individuals and strangers? Folia Primatol. 68: 254–264.
Teixidor, P., and Byrne, R. W. (1999). The ‘whinny’ of spider monkeys: individual recognition before situational meaning. Behavior 136: 279–308.
Wahlberg, M., Ramos-Fernández, G., Ugarte, F., Møhl, B., Rasch, M. (2002). Recording spider monkeys with a microphone array. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112 (5) Pt.2: 2400.
Whitehead, H. 1999. Testing association patterns of social animals. Anim. Behav. 57: 26–29.
Wilkinson, G. S., and Boughman, J. W. (1998). Social calls coordinate foraging in greater spear-nosed bats. Anim. Behav. 55: 337–350.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramos-Fernández, G. Vocal Communication in a Fission-Fusion Society: Do Spider Monkeys Stay in Touch With Close Associates?. Int J Primatol 26, 1077–1092 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-005-6459-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-005-6459-z