Skip to main content
Log in

Theorizing Capitalism’s Cracks

  • Published:
International Journal of Historical Archaeology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is commonly said that it is easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism. Alternatives, framed as a simplistic dualism of capitalism vs communism, make it difficult to envision any alternative. Instead, the “sprouts” of communism lie concealed in capitalism, inherent in its contradictory logic and the twofold nature of labor. We present this theoretical framing so that our archaeological work can focus on people’s ‘other doing’ and suggest that it will always be difficult to envision alternatives to our capitalist present until we reclaim the inspiration that exists internal to capitalism itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balibar, E. (2011). Marx’s "two discoveries." Actuel Marx 50: 44-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. (1968). Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Schocken, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonefeld, W. (2010). Abstract labor: against its nature and on its time. Capital and Class 34: 257-276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonefeld, W. and Tischler, S. (2018). What is to be done?: Leninism, Anti-Leninist Marxism and the question of revolution today. In Bonefeld, W. and Tischler, S. (eds.), What is to be Done?: Leninism, anti-Leninist Marxism and the Question of Revolution Today. Routledge, London, pp. 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (2003). After Theory. Basic, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Ruibal, A. (2008). Time to destroy: an archaeology of supermodernity. Current Anthropology 49: 247-279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Ruibal, A. (2019). An Archaeology of the Contemporary Era. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2013). The Democracy Project: A History, a Crisis, a Movement. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilakis, Y. and Duke, P. (eds.) (2007). Archaeology and Capitalism: From Ethics to Politics. Left Coast PressWalnut Creek, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilakis, Y. (2015). Archaeology and the logic of capital: pulling the emergency break. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 19: 721-735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, C. (2009). Zombie Capitalism. Haymarket, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (2010a). Cracks and the crisis of abstract labour. Antipode 42: 909-923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (2010b). Crack Capitalism. Pluto, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (2012). Crisis and critique. Capital and Class 36: 515-519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (2014). Communize. In Brincat, S. (ed.), Communism in the 21st Century, Vol. 3. Praeger, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 213-221.

  • Holloway, J. (2018). Revolt or revolution or get out of the way, capital! In Bonefeld, W. and Tischler, S. (eds.), What is to be Done?: Leninism, anti-Leninist Marxism and the Question of Revolution Today. Routledge, London, pp. 196-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E. K. (1982). Marx's concept of human nature and the labor theory of value. Review of Radical Political Economics 14: 7-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, R. and La Salle, M. (2015). Archaeology as disaster capitalism. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 19: 699-720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, G. and Hreiðarsdóttir, E. (2012). The archaeology of capitalism in Iceland: the view from Viðey. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 16: 604-621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1967). Capital. International, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1850). Address of the Central Committee to the Communist League London, March 1850. <https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/communist-league/1850-ad1.htm>; accessed December 2019.

  • Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1987 [1848]). Manifesto of the Communist Party. <https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/index.htm>; accessed December 2019.

  • Marx, K. (1844). Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. <https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/index.htm>; accessed December 2019.

  • Matthews, C. N. (2012). The Archaeology of American Capitalism. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R. H. (1992). A Marxist Archaeology. Academic, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R. H. (2008). Archaeology as Political Action. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, D. (2011). Monsters of the Market: Zombies, Vampires and Global Capitalism. Haymarket, Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ollman, B. (2008). Why dialectics? why now? In Ollman, B. and Smith, T. (eds.), Dialectics for a New Century. Palgrave, New York, pp. 8-25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ollman, B. (2014). Communism: the utopian "Marxist vision" versus a dialectical and scientific Marxist approach. In Brincat, S. (ed.), Communism in the 21st Century, Vol. 1. Praeger, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 63-81.

  • Piccini, A. and Holtorf, C. (2011). Introduction: fragments from a conversation about contemporary archaeologies. In Holtorf, C. and Piccini, A. (eds.), Contemporary Archaeologies, Excavating Now. Peter Lang, Frankfurt, pp. 9-29.

  • Saitta, D. J. (2007). The Archaeology of Collective Action. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayers, S. (2003). Creative activity and alienation in Hegel and Marx. Historical Materialism 11: 107-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurst, L. (2019). Should archaeology have a future? Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 6: 168-181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurst, L. and Mrozowski, S. (2016). Capitalism in motion. Historical Archaeology 50: 81-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to LouAnn Wurst.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dézsi, A., Wurst, L. Theorizing Capitalism’s Cracks. Int J Histor Archaeol 28, 1–10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-022-00690-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-022-00690-3

Keywords

Navigation