Abstract
In some of his writings, George Psathas suggests that Alfred Schutz’s account of social-scientific methodology as constructing ideal types falls short of ethnomethodology’s approach, which, by giving an account of how actors produce their social order, exemplifies a kind of social-scientific following of Husserl’s stipulation that phenomenology return to “the things themselves”. By distinguishing Schutz’s phenomenology of the natural attitude which does return to the things themselves from his account of social scientific methodology, one can conceive various social-scientific methodologies legitimately serving different scientific purposes with reference to the life-world basis, for instance, ideal–typical methodologies that might seek solutions to problems and ethnomethodological methods that capture actors’ production of order and mimic the phenomenological return to the things themselves. Despite delineating this distinction between phenomenology and ethnomethodology, which Psathas too makes, ethnomethodology reveals many of the investigative tendencies of phenomenology and the two can be seen to engage each other indirectly and interactively. Finally, ethnomethodologists maintain some intellectual, relevance-guided distance from the everyday actors they study, however minimal the distance between them and the actors they study may be.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Embree, L. (2015). The Schutzian theory of the cultural sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.
Garfinkel, H. (1964). Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social Problems, 11, 225–250.
Hinkle, G., Garfinkel, H., Heap, J., O’Neill, J., Psathas, G., Rose, E., et al. (1977). When is phenomenology sociological? The Annals of Phenomenological Sociology, 2, 1–44.
Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book, general introduction to a pure phenomenology. Trans. Fred Kersten. Boston: Kluwer.
Psathas, G. (1972). Ethnomethods and phenomenology. In J. G. Manis & B. N. Meltzer (Eds.), Symbolic interaction: A reader in social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 125–141). Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
Psathas, G. (1973). Introduction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Phenomenological sociology: Issues and applications (pp. 1–21). New York: Wiley.
Psathas, G. (1977). Ethnomethodology as phenomenological approach in the social science. In D. Ihde & R. Zaner (Eds.), Interdisciplinary phenomenology (pp. 73–98). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Psathas, G. (1989). Phenomenology and sociology: Theory and research. Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America.
Psathas, G. (1999). On the study of human action: Schutz and Garfinkel on social science. In L. Embree (Ed.), Schutzian social science (pp. 47–68). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Psathas, G. (2004). Alfred Schutz’s influence on american sociologists and sociology. Human Studies, 27(1), 1–35.
Schutz, A. (1962a). Common-sense and scientific interpretations of human action. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected papers 1: The problem of social reality (pp. 3–47). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1962b). Concept and theory formation in the social sciences. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected papers 1: The problem of social reality (pp. 48–66). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1962c). On multiple realities. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected papers 1: The problem of social reality (pp. 207–259). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1964). The problem of rationality in the social world. In A. Brodersen (Ed.), Collected papers 2: Studies in social theory (pp. 64–88). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Trans. G. Walsh and F. Lehnert. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Wagner, H. (1973). The scope of phenomenological sociology: Considerations and suggestions. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Phenomenological sociology: Issues and applications (pp. 61–87). New York: Wiley.
Zahavi, D. (2019). Applied phenomenology: Why it is safe to ignore the epoché. Continental Philosophical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-019-9463-y.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barber, M. George Psathas: Phenomenology and Ethnomethdology. Hum Stud 43, 343–351 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-020-09538-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-020-09538-3