Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Universidad de Chile: self-assessment and its effects on university’s management

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a brief approach to the results of a case study of a university within the Chilean higher education system, focusing on the effects of self-assessment on the university’s management of undergraduate and postgraduate programs from 2011 to 2014. The research hypothesis is that the university’s management, as a dependent variable, is impacted by self-assessment. The data gathering process was structured in three methodological steps: Step 1 considered the consistency analysis to evaluate the use of managerial language and visualize any consequences of planning documents after self-assessment. Step 2 involved the elaboration of a semi-structured interview that was applied to a sample of 12 key informants with the objective of encouraging qualitative categorization regarding the self-evaluation process and its effects. Step 3 entailed the construction of a questionnaire that would allow for a quantitative description. Several impacts have been reported analyzing the results from three main perspectives: organizational learning, cultural shift, and university and stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These definitions are part of the conceptual framework presented for this research, but are mentioned in Table 1.

  2. Unidad de Autoevaluación, Acreditación y Calidad (UAAC) is the unit in charge of coordinating and supervising self-assessment and accreditation processes that aim to improve the academic unit’s management, as well as academic programs according to the strategic guidelines and institutional development project established by the Universidad de Chile.

References

  • Ackerman, B. (1999). La política del diálogo liberal. Barcelona: Gedisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartell, M. (2003). Internationalization of universities: a university culture-based framework. Higher Education, 45(1), 43–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi, A. (2008). La crisis del modelo latinoamericano de la universidad. In J. J. Brunner & C. Peña (Eds.), Reforma de la educación superior (pp. 125–129). Santiago: UDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, J. J. (1992). Higher Education in Chile: 1980–1990. FLACSO. Documento de Trabajo, Serie Educación y Cultura No. 20, Santiago de Chile.

  • Brunner, J. J. (2016). Chile’s higher education: between market and state. Higher Education, 25(1), 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNA. (2008). Manual para el desarrollo de procesos de autoevaluación. Comisión Nacional de Acreditación, CNA-CHILE. https://www.cnachile.cl/SiteAssets/Lists/Acreditacion%20Pregrado/AllItems/Manual_Autoevaluacion.pdf

  • Corsi, J. C. (2002). Sistemas que aprenden. México: Universidad Iberoamericana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge. How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degn, L. (2014). Sensemaking, sensegiving and strategic management in Danish higher education. Higher Education, 69(6), 901–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1986). Management tasks, responsibilities, practices. New York: Truman Talley Books, E.P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingboe, B. J. (1998). Divisional strategies to internationalize a campus portrait: results, resistance, and recommendations from a case study at a U.S. university. In J. A. Mestenhauser & B. J. Elllingboe (Eds.), Reforming the higher education curriculum: internationalizing the campus (pp. 198–228). Phoenix: American Council on Education and Oryx Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUSUM (2014). Strategic University Management: Unfolding Practices. European observatory on good practices in Strategic University Management.

  • Ewell, P. (2007). The ‘quality game’: external review and institutional reaction over three decades in the United States. In: Quality assurance in higher education: trends in regulation, translation and transformation (pp. 119–153). Westerheijden, D., Stensaker, B. & Rosa, M.J. (Ed). vol. 20. Springer Netherlands. Series Higher Education Dynamics.

  • Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholders approach. Boston: Pittman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffroy, E. (2014). Origen y características del sistema de aseguramiento de la calidad de la educación superior chileno. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación Del Profesorado (REIFOP), 3(17), 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, C., & Pedraja, L. (2015) Privatization and access: the Chilean higher education experiment and its discontents. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.11.15.University of California, Berkeley.

  • Harrington, J. (1997). Administración total del mejoramiento continuo. La nueva generación. Colombia: McGraw Hill Interamericana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L., & Stensaker, B. (2008). Quality culture: understandings, boundaries and linkages. European Journal of Education, 43(4), 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaitre, M.J. & Zenteno, M.E. (Ed) (2012). Aseguramiento de la calidad en Iberoamérica: Educación superior. CINDA. Santiago de Chile.

  • Li, B., & Tu, Y. (2015). Motivations of faculty engagement in internationalization: a survey in China. Higher Education, 71(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1982). The differentiation of society. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2007). La sociedad de la sociedad. México: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2010). Organización y decisión. México D.F: Herder - Universidad Iberoamericana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magretta, J. (2012). What management is: how it works and why it’s everyone’s business. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1984). El árbol del conocimiento. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. H. (2002). The new managerialism in education management: corporatization or organizational learning? Journal of Educational Administration, 40(6), 534–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1985). The organization as political arena. Journal of Management Studies, 22(2), 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., & Rose, J. (2003). Strategic management upside down: tracking strategies at McGill University from 1829 to 1980. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration, 20(4), 270–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010a). Education at a glance. OECD indicators. https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/45926093.pdf

  • OECD. (2010b). Glossary of key terms in evaluation and results based management. OECD Publications. https://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/2754804.pdf

  • Rodríguez, D. (2004). Diagnóstico organizacional. Ciudad de México: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, D. (2011). Gestión organizacional. Elementos para su estudio. Santiago: Ediciones UC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (2005). Organization development: a wedding of anthropology and organizational therapy. In D. Bradford & W. Warner (Eds.), Reinventing organization development: New approaches to change in organizations (pp. 131–143). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sporn, B. (1996). Managing university culture. Higher Education., 32(1), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, D. (2009). The sense of dissonance: accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B. (2008). Outcomes of quality assurance: a discussion of knowledge, methodology and validity. Quality in Higher Education, 14(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre, D., & Zapata, G. (2012). Impacto de procesos de aseguramiento de la calidad sobre las instituciones de educación superior: un estudio en siete países. In M. J. Lemaitre & M. E. Zenteno (Eds.), Aseguramiento de la calidad en Iberoamérica: Educación superior, informe 2012 (pp. 115–153). Santiago de Chile: CINDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3(2), 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalta, O. (1998). Autoevaluación, autorregulación y acreditación: retos de la educación superior. Educación, 22(2), 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1964). Economía y sociedad. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Carolina Busco, Cecilia Dooner or Andrés d’Alencon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Busco, C., Dooner, C. & d’Alencon, A. Universidad de Chile: self-assessment and its effects on university’s management. High Educ 75, 431–447 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0148-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0148-7

Keywords

Navigation