Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Undergraduates’ learning experience and learning process: quantitative evidence from the East

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the construct validity of the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in Hong Kong and investigates the similarities and differences in the process of learning among students in different disciplinary studies. It is based on a survey of 1,563 undergraduate students in two disciplines, humanities and sciences, and of principally Chinese ethnicity. Findings from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses support the scale structure of the four subscales of a modified version of the CEQ (good teaching, clear goals and standards, appropriate work, and appropriate assessment) in a non-Western context and could provide a basis for cross cultural research and international benchmarking. While there was variation across subgroups, there was a genuine pattern of relationships between the perceptions of learning environment and learning strategies shown by structural modeling. This information could be used to inform the design of discipline-specific programs in the new curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, S. C., Ginns, P., & Prosser, M. (2005). Early impact and outcomes of an institutionally aligned, student focused learning perspective on teaching quality assurance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(6), 641–656. doi:10.1080/02602930500260761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn, VC: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1992). Why and how do Hong Kong students learn? Using the learning and study process questionnaires (education paper No. 14). Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1993). What do inventories of students’ learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (2003). How do students from different cultures motivate themselves for academic learning? In F. Salili & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Teaching, learning, and motivation in a multicultural context (pp. 13–32). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303–316. doi:10.1177/0049124189017003004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma, A., & Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 1–25). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86. doi:10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M., & Flood, B. (2003). Assessing the teaching quality of accounting programs: An evaluation of the course experience questionnaire. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 135–145. doi:10.1080/02602930301668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456–466. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diseth, A., Pallesen, S., Hovland, A., & Larsen, S. (2006). Course experience, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Education & Training, 48(2/3), 156–169. doi:10.1108/00400910610651782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London and Canberra: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, P., Prosser, M., & Barrie, S. (2007). Students’ perceptions of teaching quality in higher education: The perspective of currently enrolled students. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 603–615. doi:10.1080/03075070701573773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, A. S. P. (1998). Changing teachers’ conceptions of teaching as an approach to enhancing teaching and learning in tertiary education. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1994). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables. In T. W. Anderson, K. T. Fang, & I. Olkin (Eds.), Proceedings of the international symposium on multivariate analysis and its applications. Multivariate analysis and its applications (pp. 297–310). Hayward, CA: Institution of Mathematical Statistics.

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1982). Recent developments in structural equation modeling. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 404–416. doi:10.2307/3151714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (2000). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students. Higher Education, 40(1), 99–121. doi:10.1023/A:1004036826490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1990). Cultural specificity of approaches to study. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60(3), 356–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1991). A challenge to the anecdotal stereotype of the Asian student. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 117–128. doi:10.1080/03075079112331382934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (1998). The dimensionality of approaches to learning: An investigation with confirmatory factor analysis on the structure of the SPQ and LPQ. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(3), 395–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreber, C. (2003). The relationship between students’ course perception and their approaches to studying in undergraduate science courses: A Canadian experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(1), 57–75. doi:10.1080/0729436032000058623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, D., Ginns, P., & Kember, D. (2008). Examining the cultural specificity of approaches to learning in universities in Hong Kong and Sydney. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(3), 251–266. doi:10.1177/0022022107313905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52. doi:10.1080/03075070120099359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 253–388. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I-Outcome and process. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 129–150. doi:10.1080/03075079112331382944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (1994). Gender differences in mental rotation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(2), 435–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2005a). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 387–415. doi:10.1080/02602930500099193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2005b). Students’ approaches to learning and teachers’ approaches to teaching in higher education. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 673. doi:10.1080/01443410500344720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2006). Investigating the relationship between variations in students’ perceptions of their academic environment and variations in study behaviour in distance education. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 867–893. doi:10.1348/000709905X69690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, K. J. (2006). Practical multilevel analysis with MLwiN & LISREL: An integrated course (5th ed., rev.). 22nd ACSPRI summer program in social research methods and research technology, Australian National University, 23–27 January 2006. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.

  • Rowe, K. J., Hill, P. W., & Holmes-Smith, P. (1995). Methodological issues in educational performance and school effectiveness research: A discussion with worked example. Australian Journal of Education, 39(3), 217–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadlo, G. (1997). Problem-based learning enhances the educational experiences of occupational therapy students. Education for Health, 10(1), 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173–180. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarkkonen, L., & Vehkalahti, K. (2005). Measurement errors in multivariate measurement scales. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 96(1), 172–189. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2004.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991a). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22(3), 251–266. doi:10.1007/BF00132290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991b). Relating approaches to study and quality of learning outcomes at the course level. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(3), 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2005). Education quality work: The Hong Kong experience. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Educational Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Sydney, Institute for Teaching and Learning.(2005). 2005 Student course experience questionnaire (SCEQ). Retrieved December 4, 2006, from http://www.itl.usyd.edu.au/sceq2005.

  • Watchel, H. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 191–211. doi:10.1080/0260293980230207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. (1989). The role of confirmatory factor analysis in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 24(1), 685–701. doi:10.1080/00207598908246806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates of approaches to learning: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. In R. Sternberg & L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 165–195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. L., Lizzio, A., & Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and application of the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1), 33–53. doi:10.1080/03075079712331381121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wincy S. C. Chan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Webster, B.J., Chan, W.S.C., Prosser, M.T. et al. Undergraduates’ learning experience and learning process: quantitative evidence from the East. High Educ 58, 375–386 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9200-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9200-6

Keywords

Navigation