Abstract
Since Oregon implemented its Death with Dignity Act, many additional states have followed suit demonstrating a growing understanding and acceptance of aid in dying (AID) processes. Traditionally, the patient has been the one to request and seek this option out. However, as Death with Dignity acts continue to expand, it will impact the role of physicians and bring up questions over whether physicians have the ethical obligation to facilitate a conversation about AID with patients during end of life discussions. Patients have the right to make informed decisions about their health, which implies that physicians have an obligation to discuss with and inform patients of the options that will accomplish the patients’ goals of care. We will argue that physicians have an ethical obligation to inform certain patients about AID (in qualifying states) during end of life care discussions. We will also address what this obligation encompasses and explore guidelines of when and how these conversations should occur and proceed. Earlier guidelines, presented by various palliative care and ethics experts, for proceeding with such conversations have mostly agreed that the discussion of hospice and end of life care with patients should be initiated early and that the individual goals of a patient during the remaining duration of life should be thoroughly examined before discussion of appropriate options. In discussing AID, physicians should never recommend but inform patients about the basics so that they can make an informed decision. If patients express further interest in AID, the physician should open up the dialogue to address the reasoning behind this decision versus other possible treatments to ensure that patients clearly comprehend the process and implications of their decision. Ultimately, any end of life choice should be made by patients with the full capacity to express what they envision for the remaining duration of life and to comprehend the advantages and disadvantages of all the possible options.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Back, A. L., Starks, H., Hsu, C., Gordon, J. R., Bharucha, A., & Pearlman, R. A. (2002). Clinician-patient interactions about requests for physician-assisted suicide: A patient and family view. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162(11), 1257–1265. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.11.1257.
Baumrucker, S. J., Stolick, M., Carter, G. T., Mingle, P., Oertli, K. A., & Morris, G. M. (2011). Legal but not always allowed:“Physician aid in dying”. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care, 28(6), 449–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909111412540.
Braddock III, C. H., Tonelli, M. R., Starks, H., Dudzinski, D., & White, N. (2013). Physican aid-in-dying. Retrieved June 9, 2017 from https://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/pad.html
Buchbinder, M. (2017). Aid-in-dying laws and the physician's duty to inform. Journal of Medical Ethics, 43(10), 666–669. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2016-103936.
Calabrò, R. S., Naro, A., De Luca, R., Russo, M., Caccamo, L., Manuli, A., et al. (2016). The right to die in chronic disorders of consciousness: Can we avoid the slippery slope argument? Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 13(11–12), 12–24.
Cohen, J. S., Fihn, S. D., Boyko, E. J., Jonsen, A. R., & Wood, R. W. (1994). Attitudes toward assisted suicide and euthanasia among physicians in Washington State. The New England Journal of Medicine, 331(2), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199407143310206.
Dobscha, S. K., Heintz, R. T., Press, N., & Ganzini, L. (2004). Oregon physicians’ responses to requests for assisted suicide: A qualitative study. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 7(3), 451. https://doi.org/10.1089/1096621041349374.
Ganzini, L., Nelson, H. D., Lee, M. A., Kraemer, D. F., Schmidt, T. A., & Delorit, M. A. (2001). Oregon physicians' attitudes about and experiences with end-of-life care since passage of the oregon death with dignity act. JAMA, 285(18), 2363–2369. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.18.2363.
Gostin, L. O., & Roberts, A. E. (2016). Physician-assisted dying: A turning point? JAMA, 315(3), 249–250. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.16586.
Graber, D. M. A., Levy, M. B. I., Weir, R. F., & Oppliger, R. A. (1996). Patients’ views about physician participation in assisted suicide and euthanasia. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 11(2), 71.
Hall, M., Trachtenberg, F., & Dugan, E. (2005). The impact on patient trust of legalising physician aid in dying. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(12), 693–697. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.011452.
Kohlwes, R. J., Koepsell, T. D., Rhodes, L. A., & Pearlman, R. A. (2001). Physicians' responses to patients' requests for physician-assisted suicide. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161(5), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.161.5.657.
Lenherr, G., Meyer-Zehnder, B., Kressig, R. W., & Reiter-Theil, S. (2012). To speak, or not to speak—Do clinicians speak about dying and death with geriatric patients at the end of life? Swiss Medical Weekly,. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2012/13563.
Lo, B., Quill, T., & Tulsky, J. (1999). Discussing paliative care with patients. Annals of Internal Medicine, 130(9), 744.
Maynard, B. (2014). My right to death with dignity at 29. Retrieved June 2, 2017 from https://www.cnn.com/2014/10/07/opinion/maynard-assisted-suicide-cancer-dignity/
Norman-Eady, S. (2002). Oregon’s assisted suicide law. In O. O. L. Research: Connecticut general assembly. Retrived March 17, 2020 from https://www.cga.ct.gov/2002/rpt/2002-R-0077.htm.
Orentlicher, D., Pope, T. M., & Rich, B. A. (2016). Clinical criteria for physican aid in dying. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 19(3), 259–62. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm/2015/0092.
Quill, T. E. (2000). Initiating end-of-life discussions with seriously ill patients: Addressing the “elephant in the room”. JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(19), 2502–2507. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.19.2502.
Quill, T. E. (2004). Opening the black box: Physicians’ inner responses to patients’ requests for physician-assisted death. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 7(3), 469–471. https://doi.org/10.1089/109662104134955.
Quill, T. E., Back, A. L., & Block, S. D. (2016). Responding to patients requesting physician-assisted death: Physician involvement at the very end of life. JAMA, 315(3), 245–246. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.16210.
Quill, T. E., Cassel, C. K., & Meier, D. E. (1992). Care of the hopelessly ill. Proposed clinical criteria for physician-assisted suicide. The New England Journal of Medicine, 327(19), 1380–1384. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199211053271911.
Sharma, B. R. (2004). The end of life decisions—should physicians aid their patients in dying? Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 11(3), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcfm.2003.11.002.
Silveira, M. J., DiPiero, A., Gerrity, M. S., & Feudtner, C. (2000). Patients' knowledge of options at the end of life ignorance in the face of death. JAMA, 284(19), 2483–2488. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.19.2483.
Smith, F. A. (2011). Are physicians ethically obligated to address hospice as an alternative to “usual” treatment of advancing end-stage disease? JAMA, 43(3), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9209.
Tucker, K. L. (2012). Aid in dying: Guidance for an emerging end-of-life practice. Chest, 142(1), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-0046.
Vermont, US District Court for the District of (2016). Vermont Alliance for Ethical Healthcare et al. V. William K. Hoser et al. Complaint Document. Alliance Defending Freedom. https://adflegal.blob.core.windows.net/mainsite-new/docs/default-source/documents/legal-documents/vermont-alliance-for-ethical-healthcare-v.-hoser/vermont-alliance-for-ethical-healthcare-v-hoser---complaint.pdf?sfvrsn=f2d4180e_4.
Voorhees, J. R., Rietjens, J. A. C., van der Heide, A., & Drickamer, M. A. (2014). Discussing physician-assisted dying: Physicians’ experiences in the United States and the Netherlands. The Gerontologist, 54(5), 808–817. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt087.
Weiss-Tisman, H. (2017). Federal judge dismisses challenge to Vermont’s end of life law. The Frequency and VPR News, April 06. Retrieved March 17, 2020 from https://www.vpr.org/post/federal-judge-dismisses-challenge-vermonts-end-life-law.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, Y.M.J., Shelton, W. Physicians’ End of Life Discussions with Patients: Is There an Ethical Obligation to Discuss Aid in Dying?. HEC Forum 32, 227–238 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09402-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09402-y