Abstract
Several studies show that healthcare professionals need to communicate inter-professionally in order to manage ethical difficulties. A model of clinical ethics support (CES) inspired by Habermas’ theory of discourse ethics has been developed by our research group. In this version of CES sessions healthcare professionals meet inter-professionally to communicate and reflect on ethical difficulties in a cooperative manner with the aim of reaching communicative agreement or reflective consensus. In order to understand the course of action during CES, the aim of this study was to describe the communication of value conflicts during a series of inter-professional CES sessions. Ten audio- and video-recorded CES sessions were conducted over eight months and were analyzed by using the video analysis tool Transana and qualitative content analysis. The results showed that during the CES sessions the professionals as a group moved through the following five phases: a value conflict expressed as feelings of frustration, sharing disempowerment and helplessness, the revelation of the value conflict, enhancing realistic expectations, seeing opportunities to change the situation instead of obstacles. In the course of CES, the professionals moved from an individual interpretation of the situation to a common, new understanding and then to a change in approach. An open and permissive communication climate meant that the professionals dared to expose themselves, share their feelings, face their own emotions, and eventually arrive at a mutual shared reality. The value conflict was not only revealed but also resolved.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benhabib, S. (1990). Communicative ethics and contemporary controversies in practical philosophy. In S. Benhabib & F. R. Dallmayr (Eds.), The communicative ethics controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Caldwell, K., & Atwal, A. (2005). Non-participant observation: Using video tapes to collect data in nursing research. Nurse Researcher, 13(2), 42–54. doi:10.7748/nr2005.10.13.2.42.c5967.
Cusveller, B., & Schep-Akkerman, A. (2015). Towards a competency assessment tool for nurses in ethics meetings. Nursing Ethics. doi:10.1177/0969733014567170 (Epub ahead of print).
Dauwerse, L., Abma, T. A., Molewijk, B., & Widdershoven, G. (2013). Goals of clinical ethics support: Perceptions of Dutch healthcare institutions. Health Care Analysis, 21(4), 323–337. doi:10.1007/s10728-011-0189-5.
Dempster, P., & Woods, D. (2011). The economic crisis through the eyes of Transana. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12, Art 16.
Edwards, M. P., McClement, S. E., & Read, L. R. (2013). Nurses’ responses to initial moral distress in long-term care. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 10(3), 325–336. doi:10.1007/s11673-013-9463-6.
Gracia, D. (2003). Ethical case deliberation and decision making. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 6(3), 227–233. doi:10.1023/A:1025969701538.
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
Gronlund, C. E. C. F., Dahlqvist, V., & Soderberg, A. I. S. (2011). Feeling trapped and being torn: Physicians’ narratives about ethical dilemmas in hemodialysis care that evoke a troubled conscience. BMC Medical Ethics, 12, 8. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-12-8.
Gronlund, C. E., Soderberg, A. I., Zingmark, K. M., Sandlund, S. M., & Dahlqvist, V. (2014). Ethically difficult situations in hemodialysis care: Nurses’ narratives. Nursing Ethics. doi:10.1177/0969733014542677 (Epub ahead of print).
Habermas, J. (1990). Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification. In S. Benhabib & F. R. Dallmayr (Eds.), The communicative ethics controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1995). Communicative action: Texts, language, rationalization and society (SWE). Göteborg: Bokförlaget Daidalos AB.
Halvorsen, K., Slettebø, A., Nortvedt, P., Pedersen, R., Kirkevold, M., & Nordhaug, M. (2008). Priority dilemmas in dialysis: The impact of old age. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(8), 585–589. doi:10.1136/jme.2007.022061.
Hansson, M. G. (2002). Imaginative ethics: Bringing ethical praxis into sharper relief. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 5(1), 33–42. doi:10.1023/A:1014257603144.
Heath, C., & Hindmarsh, P. (2011). Video in qualitative research analysing social interaction in everyday life. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Hem, M. H., Pedersen, R., Norvoll, R., & Molewijk, B. (2015). Evaluating clinical ethics support in mental healthcare. A systematic literature review. Nursing Ethics, 22(4), 452–466. doi:10.1177/0969733014539783.
Hermsen, M., & van der Donk, M. (2009). Nurses’ moral problems in dialysis. Nursing Ethics, 16(2), 184–191. doi:10.1177/0969733008100078.
Hovland, B. I. (2013). Narrative ethics in care and social welfare (SWE). Malmö: Gleerup.
Janssens, R. M., van Zadelhoff, E., van Loo, G., Widdershoven, G. A., & Molewijk, B. A. (2014). Evaluation and perceived results of moral case deliberation: A mixed methods study. Nursing Ethics. doi:10.1177/0969733014557115 (Epub ahead of print).
Jiménez-Herrera, M. F., & Axelsson, C. (2014). Some ethical conflicts in emergency care. Nursing Ethics. doi:10.1177/0969733014549880 (Epub ahead of print).
Kopenhaver Haidet, K., Tate, J., Divirgilio-Thomas, D., Kolanowski, A., & Happ, M. B. (2009). Methods to improve reliability of video-recorded behavioral data. Research in Nursing and Health, 32(4), 465–474. doi:10.1002/nur.20334.
Latvala, E., Vuokila-Oikkonen, P., & Janhonen, S. (2000). Videotaped recording as a method of participant observation in psychiatric nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(5), 1252–1257. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01383.x.
Lindseth, A., & Norberg, A. (2004). A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 18(2), 145–153. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00258.x.
Lindström, U. Å. (2014). Nursing science and hermeneutics in practice (SWE). In E. Lassenius & E. Severinsson (Eds.), Hermeneutics in nursing practice: The near, the passing the hidden (SWE). Malmö: Gleerup.
Mavrou, K., Graeme, D., & Lewis, A. (2007). The use of Transana as a video analysis tool in researching computer-based collaborative learning in inclusive classrooms in Cyprus. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 30, 163–178. doi:10.1080/17437270701383305.
Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Qualitative research: Observational methods in health care settings. British Medical Journal, 311(6998), 182–184. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6998.182.
Molewijk, A. C., Abma, T., Stolper, M., & Widdershoven, G. (2008a). Teaching ethics in the clinic. The theory and practice of moral case deliberation. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(2), 120–124. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018580.
Molewijk, B., Verkerk, M., Milius, H., & Widdershoven, G. (2008b). Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital: Process and outcome. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 11(1), 43–56. doi:10.1007/s11019-007-9103-1.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Emotions and women’s capabilities. In J. Glover & M. C. Nussbaum (Eds.), Women, culture, and development [Electronic resource]. Oxford: Oxford University Press Scholarship Online.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rasoal, D., Kihlgren, A., James, I., & Svantesson, M. (2015). What healthcare teams find ethically difficult: Captured in 70 moral case deliberations. Nursing Ethics. doi:10.1177/0969733015583928 (Epub ahead of print).
Schildmann, J., Gordon, J. S., & Vollmann, J. (2010). Clinical ethics consultation: Theories and methods, implementation, evaluation. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Shotter, J. (2009). Listening in a way that recognizes/realizes the world of the other. International Journal of Listening, 23(1), 21–43. doi:10.1080/10904010802591904.
Silén, M., Svantesson, M., & Ahlstrom, G. (2008). Nurses’ conceptions of decision making concerning life-sustaining treatment. Nursing Ethics, 15(2), 160–173. doi:10.1177/0969733007086014.
Sørlie, V., Lindseth, A., Førde, R., & Norberg, A. (2003). The meaning of being in ethically difficult care situations in pediatrics as narrated by male registered nurses. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 18(5), 350–357. doi:10.1016/S0882-5963(03)00028-9.
Sørlie, V., Lindseth, A., Uden, G., & Norberg, A. (2000). Women physicians’ narratives about being in ethically difficult care situations in paediatrics. Nursing Ethics, 7(1), 47–62. doi:10.1177/096973300000700107.
Svantesson, M., Lofmark, R., Thorsén, H., Kallenberg, K., & Ahlstrom, G. (2008). Learning a way through ethical problems: Swedish nurses’ and doctors’ experiences from one model of ethics rounds. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(5), 399–406. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019810.
Ulrich, C., O’Donnell, P., Taylor, C., Farrar, A., Danis, M., & Grady, C. (2007). Ethical climate, ethics stress, and the job satisfaction of nurses and social workers in the United States. Social Science and Medicine, 65(8), 1708–1719. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.050.
van der Dam, S., Abma, T. A., Molewijk, A. C., Kardol, M. J. M., & Schols, J. M. G. A. (2011). Organizing moral case deliberation. Experiences in two Dutch nursing homes. Nursing Ethics, 18(3), 327–340. doi:10.1177/0969733011400299.
van der Dam, S., Schols, J. M. G. A., Kardol, T. J. M., Molewijk, B. C., Widdershoven, G. A. M., & Abma, T. A. (2013). The discovery of deliberation. From ambiguity to appreciation through the learning process of doing moral case deliberation in Dutch elderly care. Social Science and Medicine, 83, 125–132. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.024.
Weidema, F. C., Molewijk, B. A. C., Kamsteeg, F., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2013). Aims and harvest of moral case deliberation. Nursing Ethics, 20(6), 617–631. doi:10.1177/0969733012473773.
Acknowledgments
This study has been supported by Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Sweden and the County Council of Norrbotten, Sweden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Research involving human participants informed consent.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grönlund, C.F., Dahlqvist, V., Zingmark, K. et al. Managing Ethical Difficulties in Healthcare: Communicating in Inter-professional Clinical Ethics Support Sessions. HEC Forum 28, 321–338 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-016-9303-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-016-9303-2