Abstract
Many medical services lack robust evidence of effectiveness and may therefore be considered “unnecessary” care. Proactively withdrawing resources from, or de-funding, such services and redirecting the savings to services that have proven effectiveness would enhance overall health system performance. Despite this, governments have been reluctant to discontinue funding of services once funding is in place. The focus of this study is to understand how the framing of an issue or problem influences government decision-making related to de-funding of medical services. To achieve this, a framework describing how problem frames, or explanatory naratives, influence government policy decisions was developed and applied to actual cases. The two cases selected were the Ontario government’s decisions to de-fund the drug Oxycontin and blood glucose test strips used by patients with diabetes. A qualitative content analysis of public discourse (political debate and media coverage) surrounding these two resource withdrawal examples was conducted and described using the framework. In the framework, government decision-making is a partial reflection of the visibility of the policy issue and complexity of the causal story told within a problem frame. By applying this framework and considering these two key characteristics of problem frames, we can better understand, and possibly predict, the shape and timing of government policy decisions to withdraw resources from medical services.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material (Data Transparency)
All data used in the analysis is publically available.
Code Availability (Software Application or Custom Code)
Not applicable.
References
Arah, O. A., Westert, G. P., Hurst, J., & Klazinga, N. S. (2006). A conceptual framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 18(1), 5–13.
Elshaug, A. G., Watt, A. M., Mundy, L., & Willis, C. (2012). Appendix to: Over 150 potentially low-value health care practices: An Australian study. Medical Journal of Australia. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja12.11083.Appendix.
Elshaug, A. G., Watt, A. M., Moss, J. R., & Hiller, J. E. (2009). Policy perspectives on the obsolescence of health technologies in Canada. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in health (CADTH), 1–29.
Gallego, G., Haas, M., Hall, J., & Viney, R. (2010). Reducing the use of ineffective health care interventions. Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation.
Haas, M., Hall, J., Viney, R., & Gallego, G. (2012). Breaking up is hard to do: why disinvestment in medical technology is harder than investment. Australian Health Review : A Publication of the Australian Hospital Association, 36(2), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH11032.
Giacomini, M., Hurley, J., & Stoddart, G. (2000). The many meanings of deinsuring a health service: the case of in vitro fertilization in Ontario. Social Science & Medicine, 50(10), 1485–1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00394-9.
Mitton, C., & Donaldson, C. (2002). Setting priorities in Canadian regional health authorities: a survey of key decision makers. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 60(1), 39–58. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11879944
KiKingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
Rein, M., & Schon, D. (1996). Frame-critical policy analysis and frame- reflective policy practice. Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal fo Knowledge Transfer and Utilization, 9(1), 85–104.
Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1993). Problem definition, agenda access and policies. Policy Studies Journal, 21(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1993.tb01453.x.
Stone, D. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political science quarterly, 104(2), 281–300. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/https://doi.org/10.2307/2151585
Dery, D. (2000). Agenda Setting and Problem Definition. Policy Studies, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/014428700114008.
Giacomini, M., Lomas, J., Hurley, J., Bhatia, V., & Goldsmith, L. (1996). The devil in the details: some conclusions about how funding changes translate into financial incentives in the Canadian health system (No. 1996-14). Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA). Hamilton, Canada: McMaster University.
Giacomini, M., Hurley, J., Gold, I., Smith, P., & Abelson, J. (2004). The policy analysis of ‘values talk’: lessons from Canadian health reform. Health Policy, 67(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(03)00100-3.
Mechanic, D. (1997). Muddling through elegantly: finding the proper balance in rationing. Health Affairs, 16(5), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.16.5.83.
National Health Committee. (2012). Think Piece: Towards a plan for disinvestment. Wellington: National Health Committee.
Pearson, S., & Littlejohns, P. (2007). Reallocating resources: how should the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guide disinvestment efforts in the National Health Service? Journal of health services research & policy, 12(3), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581907781542987.
Ham, C., & Coulter, A. (2001). Explicit and implicit rationing: taking responsibility and avoiding blame for health care choices. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 6(3), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819011927422.
Klein, R., Day, P., & Redmayne, S. (1995). Rationing in the NHS: The dance of the seven veils in reverse. British medical bulletin, 51(4), 769–780.
Soroka, S. (2002). Issue attributes and agenda setting by media, the public and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(3), 264–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264.
Soroka, S., Penner, E., & Blidook, K. (2009). Constituency Influence in Parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 42(03), 563. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423909990059.
Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 170–184). London, UK: SAGE publications Lrd.
Massinon, S. (2010). OxyContin cure often worse than ailment; Rising addictions to the powerful painkiller have led to a spike in crime, putting pharmacies on high alert. Calgary: Calgary Herald.
Hurley, M. (2010). Pharmacies trying to cope with thefts of narcotics; Supplies reduced, security increased; ‘We can’t do much. Globe and Mail, p. 1.
Star, T. (2010). Ontario launches plan to curb narcotics abuse; Database will track sales and prescribing doctors while boosting programs for oxycodone addicts. Toronto ON: Toronto Star.
Sousa, C. (2010). Narcotics Safety and Awareness Act (N0 49) Second Session, 39th Parliament. Legislative Assembly of Ontario.
Miller, N. (2010). Narcotics Safety and Awareness Act (N0 49) Second Session, 39th Parliament.
O’Toole, J. (2010). Narcotics Safety and Awareness Act (N0 49) Second Session, 39th Parliament.
Babbage, M. (2010). Ontario to track overuse of prescription drugs, curb use of OxyContin. Toronto: The Canadian Press.
Weeks, C. (2010). First Canadian guidelines issued for opioid painkillers - The Globe and Mail. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/first-canadian-guidelines-issued-for-opioid-painkillers/article1367228/
Bouzane, B., & Ross, A. (2010). May). Ottawa Citizen: New guidelines seek to curb painkiller abuse.
Elliot, C. (2010, October 26). Hansard Issue: NARCOTICS SAFETY AND AWARENESS ACT, 2010 . Retrieved August 31, 2020, from http://hansardindex.ontla.on.ca/hansardeissue/39-2/l072.htm
Ramal, Kahil (2010) Narcotic Safety and Awareness Act. (No. 52). (2012), (52).
Mathews, D. (2010). Narcotics Safety and Awareness Act (N0 13).
Boyle, T. (2015). Ontario quietly cuts funding for diabetics’ blood sugar test strips. Ontario reducing funding for blood-glucose test strips after research shows they have limited beneit for diabetes patients not taking insulin. Toronto Star, 2–3.
Gomes, T., Juurlink, D. N., Shah, B. R., Paterson, J. M., & Mamdani, M. M. (2009). Blood glucose test strip use: patterns, costs and potential cost reduction associated with reduced testing. Toronto (Ont.): Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences.
The Canadian Press-Broadcast wire. (2015), (February 2012). Medi+Sure® Blood glucose test strip creates significant savings for Ontario’s ODB and healthcare system. (n.d.). Retrieved August 31, 2020, from https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/medisure-blood-glucose-test-strip-creates-significant-savings-for-ontarios-odb-and-healthcare-system-511903751.html
Katikireddi, S. V., Bond, L., & Hilton, S. (2014). Changing policy framing as a deliberate strategy for public health advocacy: A qualitative policy case study of minimum unit pricing of alcohol. Milbank Quarterly, 92(2), 250–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12057.
Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1994) The politics of problem definition. (D. A. Rochefort & R. W. Cobb, Eds.). University Press of Kansas, Kansas City
Smith, N., Mitton, C., Davidson, A., & Williams, I. (2014). A politics of priority setting: Ideas, interests and institutions in healthcare resource allocation. Public Policy and Administration, 29(4), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076714529141.
Giacomini, M. (1999). The which-hunt: assembling health technologies for assessment and rationing. Journal of health politics, policy and law, 24(4), 715–58. Retrieved from http://jhppl.dukejournals.org/content/24/4/715.short
Daniels, T., Williams, I., Robinson, S., & Spence, K. (2013). Tackling disinvestment in health care services: The views of resource allocators in the English NHS. Journal of health organization and management, 27(6), 762–780. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-11-2012-0225.
Russell, J., Swinglehurst, D., & Greenhalgh, T. (2014). “Cosmetic boob jobs” or evidence-based breast surgery: an interpretive policy analysis of the rationing of “low value” treatments in the English National Health Service. BMC health services research, 14(1), 413. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-413.
Elshaug, A. G., Hiller, J. E., Tunis, S. R., & Moss, J. R. (2007). Challenges in Australian policy processes for disinvestment from existing, ineffective health care practices. Australia and New Zealand health policy, 4, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-4-23.
Trebilcock, M. J., & Hartle, D. G. (1982). The choice of governing instrument. International Review of Law and Economics, 2(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(82)90012-6.
Böhm, K., Schmid, A., Götze, R., Landwehr, C., & Rothgang, H. (2013). Five types of OECD healthcare systems: empirical results of a deductive classification. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 113(3), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.09.003.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors meet the journal’s criteria for authorship and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest or competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Embrett, M., Randall, G.E. Understanding Government Decisions to De-fund Medical Services Analyzing the Impact of Problem Frames on Resource Allocation Policies. Health Care Anal 29, 78–98 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00426-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00426-6