Abstract
Mutation is prerequisite for creating new variation in crop plants. This variation forms the basis for any crop improvement program. In this study, a population of 3774 mungbean M1 mutant plants were generated using 0.7% of ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS). For TILLING by sequencing, 768 M2 families were sequenced for three different candidate genes responsible for altering plant architecture in mungbean. In total, five exon residing mutations were identified, among them three mutations each in GIGANTEA (GI), RAMOSUS (RMS) and TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1) were found to be deleterious and altering the protein function based on SIFT analysis. Through morphological characterization, we confirmed the potential role of each mutation in altering mungbean plant architecture to develop an ideal plant type to increase the yield potential. Additionally, mutants with desirable traits such as increase in number of branches, and terminal and late flowering were selected from this study and advanced to further generation, as well as we are planning to pyramiding all three mutation in single genetic background that could contribute potentially towards developing high yielding mungbean genotypes with ideal plant type.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarez J, Guli CL, Yu XH, Smyth DR (1992) Terminal flower: a gene affecting inflorescence development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2:103–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.1992.00103.x
Amri-Tiliouine W, Laouar M, Abdelguerfi A, Jankowicz-Cieslak J, Jankuloski L, Till BJ (2018) Genetic variability induced by gamma rays and preliminary results of low-cost TILLING on M2 generation of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Front Plant Sci 9:1568. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01568
Arumingtyas EL, Floyd RS, Gregory MJ, Mufert IC (1992) Branching in pisum: inheritance and allelism tests with 17 ramosus mutants. No. REP-12952. CIMMYT
Barthélémy D, Caraglio Y (2007) Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Ann Bot 99(3):375–407. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl260
Bell MJ, Bagnall DJ, Harch G (1991) Effects of photoperiod on reproductive development of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in a cool subtropical environment. II. Temperature interactions. Aust J Agric Res 42(7):1151–1161. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9911151
Benlloch R, Berbel A, Ali L, Gohari G, Millán T, Madueño F (2015) Genetic control of inflorescence architecture in legumes. Front Plant Sci 6:543. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00543
Berbel A, Ferrándiz C, Hecht V, Dalmais M, Lund OS, Sussmilch FC, Taylor SA, Bendahmane A, Ellis TN, Beltrán JP, Weller JL (2012) VEGETATIVE1 is essential for development of the compound inflorescence in pea. Nat Commun 3(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1801
Beveridge CA, Symons GM, Murfet IC, Ross JJ, Rameau C (1997) The rms1 mutant of pea has elevated indole-3-acetic acid levels and reduced root-sap zeatin riboside content but increased branching controlled by graft-transmissible signal (s). Plant Physiol 115(3):1251–1258
Boualem A, Fleurier S, Troadec C, Audigier P, Kumar AP, Chatterjee M, Alsadon AA, Sadder MT, Wahb-Allah MA, Al-Doss AA, Bendahmane A (2014) Development of a Cucumis sativus TILLinG platform for forward and reverse genetics. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097963
Bushby HVA, Lawn RJ (1992) Accumulation and partitioning of nitrogen and dry matter by contrasting genotypes of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Crop Past Sci 43:1609–1628. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9921609
Cai Y, Chen L, Liu X, Guo C, Sun S, Wu C, Jiang B, Han T, Hou W (2018) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmFT2a delays flowering time in soya bean. Plant Biotechnol J 16(1):176–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12758
Chauhan YS, Williams R (2018) Physiological and agronomic strategies to increase mungbean yield in climatically variable environments of Northern Australia. Agronomy 8(6):83. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8060083
Chen A, Dubcovsky J (2012) Wheat TILLING mutants show that the vernalization gene VRN1 down-regulates the flowering repressor VRN2 in leaves but is not essential for flowering. PLoS Genet. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003134
Cui SY, Yu DY (2005) Estimates of relative contribution of biomass, harvest index and yield components to soybean yield improvements in China. Plant Breed 124(5):473–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2005.01112.x
Curtis IS, Nam HG, Yun JY, Seo KH (2002) Expression of an antisense GIGANTEA (GI) gene fragment in transgenic radish causes delayed bolting and flowering. Transgenic Res 11(3):249–256. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015655606996
Datta S, Gangwar S, Kumar S, Gupta S, Rai R, Kaashyap M, Singh P, Chaturvedi SK, Singh BB, Nadarajan N (2012) Genetic diversity in selected Indian mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] cultivars using RAPD markers. Am J Plant Sci 3(8):1085–1091. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2012.38130
Dhanasekar P, Reddy KS (2015) A novel mutation in TFL1 homolog affecting determinacy in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Mol Genet Genomics 290(1):55–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-014-0899-0
Donald CM, Hamblin J (1976) The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Adv Agron 28:361–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60559-3
Finnegan EJ, Genger RK, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (1998) DNA methylation in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 49(1):223–247. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.223
Foo E, Bullier E, Goussot M, Foucher F, Rameau C, Beveridge CA (2005) The branching gene RAMOSUS1 mediates interactions among two novel signals and auxin in pea. Plant Cell 17(2):464–474. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.104.026716
Foucher F, Morin J, Courtiade J, Cadioux S, Ellis N, Banfield MJ, Rameau C (2003) DETERMINATE and LATE FLOWERING are two TERMINAL FLOWER1/CENTRORADIALIS homologs that control two distinct phases of flowering initiation and development in pea. Plant Cell 15(11):2742–2754. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.015701
Frerichmann SL, Kirchhoff M, Müller AE, Scheidig AJ, Jung C, Kopisch-Obuch FJ (2013) EcoTILLING in Beta vulgaris reveals polymorphisms in the FLC-like gene BvFL1 that are associated with annuality and winter hardiness. BMC Plant Biol 13(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-52
Gepts P (2004) Who owns biodiversity, and how should the owners be compensated? Plant Physiol 134(4):1295–1307. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.038885
Graham PH, Vance CP (2003) Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol 131(3):872–877. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.017004
Guo Y, Hans H, Christian J, Molina C (2014) Mutations in single FT-and TFL1-paralogs of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) and their impact on flowering time and yield components. Front Plant Sci 5:282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00282
Gurunathan S, Ramadoss BR, Nayak C, Kalagatur NK, Bapu JR, Mohan C, Alqarawi AA, Hashem A, Abd_Allah EF (2019) Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in starch biosynthetic genes associated with increased resistant starch concentration in rice mutant. Front Genet 10:946. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00946
Hay RKM (1995) Harvest index: a review of its use in plant breeding and crop physiology. Ann Appl Biol 126(1):197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1995.tb05015.x
Hecht V, Laurie RE, Vander Schoor JK, Ridge S, Knowles CL, Liew LC, Sussmilch FC, Murfet IC, Macknight RC, Weller JL (2011) The pea GIGAS gene is a FLOWERING LOCUS T homolog necessary for graft-transmissible specification of flowering but not for responsiveness to photoperiod. Plant Cell 23(1):147–161. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.081042
Hofer J, Turner L, Moreau C, Ambrose M, Isaac P, Butcher S, Weller J, Dupin A, Dalmais M, Le Signor C, Bendahmane A (2009) Tendril-less regulates tendril formation in pea leaves. Plant Cell 21(2):420–428. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.064071
Huyghe C (1998) Genetics and genetic modifications of plant architecture in grain legumes: a review. Agronomie 18(5–6):383–411. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19980505
Kang YJ, Kim SK, Kim MY, Lestari P, Kim KH, Ha BK, Jun TH, Hwang WJ, Lee T, Lee J, Shim S (2014) Genome sequence of mungbean and insights into evolution within Vigna species. Nat Commun 5:5443. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6443
Khan M, Salman M, Singh VP, Kumar A (2017) Studies on effect of phosphorous levels on growth and yield of Kharif mungbean (Vigna radiata L. wilczek). Int J Pure Appl Biosci 5(4):800–808. https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.4064
Kim Y, Schumaker KS, Zhu JK (2006) EMS mutagenesis of Arabidopsis. In: Arabidopsis protocols, pp 101–103. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot4621
Knapp J, Umhang G, Poulle ML, Millon L (2016) Development of a real-time PCR for a sensitive one-step coprodiagnosis allowing both the identification of carnivore feces and the detection of Toxocara spp. and Echinococcus multilocularis. Appl Environ Microbiol 82(10):2950–2958. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03467-15
Langmead B, Salzberg SL (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9(4):357. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16):2078–2079. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Liu B, Watanabe S, Uchiyama T, Kong F, Kanazawa A, Xia Z, Nagamatsu A, Arai M, Yamada T, Kitamura K, Masuta C (2010) The soybean stem growth habit gene Dt1 is an ortholog of Arabidopsis TERMINAL FLOWER1. Plant Physiol 153(1):198–210. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.150607
Mercantil G (2011) Colheita do caupi mecanizada no nordeste do Pará. http://www.investnews.net
Mizoguchi T, Wright L, Fujiwara S, Cremer F, Lee K, Onouchi H, Mouradov A, Fowler S, Kamada H, Putterill J, Coupland G (2005) Distinct roles of GIGANTEA in promoting flowering and regulating circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17(8):2255–2270. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.033464
Mogotsi KK (2006) Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek. PROTA 1:23–29. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.preprints.1200085
Morris SE, Cox MC, Ross JJ, Krisantini S, Beveridge CA (2005) Auxin dynamics after decapitation are not correlated with the initial growth of axillary buds. Plant Physiol 138(3):1665–1672. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.058743
Morris SE, Turnbull CG, Murfet IC, Beveridge CA (2001) Mutational analysis of branching in pea. Evidence ThatRms1 and Rms5 regulate the same novel signal. Plant Physiol 126(3):1205–1213. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.126.3.1205
Murfet IC, Symons GC (2000) Double mutant rms2 rms5 expresses a transgressive, profuse branching phenotype. Pisum Genet 32:33–38
Nadarajan N, Gupta S (2010) Role of classical breeding in improvement of pulse crops. Electron J Plant Breed 1(4):1099–1106
Ng PC, Henikoff S (2003) SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res 31(13):3812–3814. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg509
Ohshima S, Murata M, Sakamoto W, Ogura Y, Motoyoshi F (1997) Cloning and molecular analysis of the Arabidopsis gene Terminal Flower 1. Mol Gen Genet 254(2):186–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380050407
Pratap A, Sen Gupta D, Singh BB, Kumar S (2013) Development of super early genotypes in greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Legume Res Int J. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/7210
Raes D, Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E (2009) AquaCrop-The FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: II. Main algorithms and software description. Agron J 101:438–447. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0140s
Raines CA (2011) Increasing photosynthetic carbon assimilation in C3 plants to improve crop yield: current and future strategies. Plant Physiol 155(1):36–42. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.168559
Raja RB, Agasimani S, Anusheela V, Thiruvengadam V, Chibbar RN, Ram SG (2016) TILLING and EcoTILLING for discovery of induced and natural variations in sorghum genome. In: The sorghum genome. Springer, Cham, pp 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47789-3_14
Raja RB, Agasimani S, Jaiswal S, Thiruvengadam V, Sabariappan R, Chibbar RN, Ram SG (2017) EcoTILLING by sequencing reveals polymorphisms in genes encoding starch synthases that are associated with low glycemic response in rice. BMC Plant Biol 17(1):L:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0968-0
Reddy TV, Dwivedi S, Sharma NK (2012) Development of TILLING by sequencing platform towards enhanced leaf yield in tobacco. Ind Crops Prod 40:324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.03.031
Repinski SL, Kwak M, Gepts P (2012) The common bean growth habit gene PvTFL1y is a functional homolog of Arabidopsis TFL1. Theor Appl Genet 124(8):1539–1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1808-8
Rigola D, van Oeveren J, Janssen A, Bonné A, Schneiders H, van der Poel HJ, van Orsouw NJ, Hogers RC, de Both MT, van Eijk MJ (2009) High-throughput detection of induced mutations and natural variation using KeyPointTM technology. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004761
Robertson MJ, Fukai S, Peoples MB (2004) The effect of timing and severity of water deficit on growth, development, yield accumulation and nitrogen fixation of mungbean. Field Crops Res 86(1):67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00120-5
Schultz EA, Haughn GW (1993) Genetic analysis of the floral initiation process (FLIP) in Arabidopsis. Development 119:745–765
Sikora P, Chawade A, Larsson M, Olsson J, Olsson O (2011) Mutagenesis as a tool in plant genetics, functional genomics, and breeding. Int J Plant Genomics 2011:314829. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/314829
Sinclair TR (1998) Historical changes in harvest index and crop nitrogen accumulation. Crop Sci 38(3):638–643. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800030002x
Singh DP, Singh BB (2011) Breeding for tolerance to abiotic stresses in mungbean. J Food Legumes 24(2):83–90
Tian Z, Wang X, Lee R, Li Y, Specht JE, Nelson RL, McClean PE, Qiu L, Ma J (2010) Artificial selection for determinate growth habit in soybean. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(19):8563–8568. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000088107
Tiwari AK, Shivhare AK (2017) Pulses in India: retrospect and prospects. Report, Govt. of India, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Directorate of Pulses Development, Bhopal (MP)
Triques K, Sturbois B, Gallais S, Dalmais M, Chauvin S, Clepet C, Aubourg S, Rameau C, Caboche M, Bendahmane A (2007) Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana mismatch specific endonucleases: application to mutation discovery by TILLING in pea. Plant J 51(6):1116–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03201.x
Tsai H, Howell T, Nitcher R, Missirian V, Watson B, Ngo KJ, Lieberman M, Fass J, Uauy C, Tran RK, Khan AA (2011) Discovery of rare mutations in populations: TILLING by sequencing. Plant Physiol 156(3):1257–1268. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.169748
Zhang H, Hao D, Sitoe HM, Yin Z, Hu Z, Zhang G, Yu D (2015) Genetic dissection of the relationship between plant architecture and yield component traits in soybean (Glycine max) by association analysis across multiple environments. Plant Breed 134(5):564–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12305
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Department of Biotechnology, Government of India under TILLING by sequencing of morphogenesis and flowering control genes to augment ideotype breeding in Mungbean.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AV and BRR performed the experiments, data analysis and drafted the manuscript, SG, and RB helped in data analysis and execution of this study, SGR and GK conceptualized this study and provided lab facility and guidance for drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Varadaraju, A., Ramadoss, B.R., Gurunathan, S. et al. TILLING by sequencing (TbyS) reveals mutations in flowering control genes that are associated with altered plant architecture in Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek). Genet Resour Crop Evol 68, 849–864 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-020-01028-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-020-01028-w