Skip to main content
Log in

Unambiguous Quantization from the Maximum Classical Correspondence that Is Self-consistent: The Slightly Stronger Canonical Commutation Rule Dirac Missed

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dirac’s identification of the quantum analog of the Poisson bracket with the commutator is reviewed, as is the threat of self-inconsistent overdetermination of the quantization of classical dynamical variables which drove him to restrict the assumption of correspondence between quantum and classical Poisson brackets to embrace only the Cartesian components of the phase space vector. Dirac’s canonical commutation rule fails to determine the order of noncommuting factors within quantized classical dynamical variables, but does imply the quantum/classical correspondence of Poisson brackets between any linear function of phase space and the sum of an arbitrary function of only configuration space with one of only momentum space. Since every linear function of phase space is itself such a sum, it is worth checking whether the assumption of quantum/classical correspondence of Poisson brackets for all such sums is still self-consistent. Not only is that so, but this slightly stronger canonical commutation rule also unambiguously determines the order of noncommuting factors within quantized dynamical variables in accord with the 1925 Born-Jordan quantization surmise, thus replicating the results of the Hamiltonian path integral, a fact first realized by E.H. Kerner. Born-Jordan quantization validates the generalized Ehrenfest theorem, but has no inverse, which disallows the disturbing features of the poorly physically motivated invertible Weyl quantization, i.e., its unique deterministic classical “shadow world” which can manifest negative densities in phase space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dirac, P.A.M.: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, Math. Phys. Sci. 109, 642 (1925)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Dirac, P.A.M.: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, Math. Phys. Sci. 110, 561 (1926)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dirac, P.A.M.: The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford University Press, London, 1947)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Groenewold, H.J.: Physica 12, 405 (1946)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Kerner, E.H.: private conversation

  6. Kerner, E.H., Sutcliffe, W.G.: J. Math. Phys. 11, 391 (1970)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, L.: J. Math. Phys. 11, 3296 (1970)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Feynman, R.P.: Phys. Rev. 84, 108 (1951)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Born, M., Jordan, P.: Z. Phys. 34, 858 (1925)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weyl, H.: Z. Phys. 46, 1 (1927)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Kenneth Kauffmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kauffmann, S.K. Unambiguous Quantization from the Maximum Classical Correspondence that Is Self-consistent: The Slightly Stronger Canonical Commutation Rule Dirac Missed. Found Phys 41, 805–819 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9523-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9523-2

Keywords

Navigation