Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Virtual Invaders

  • Reply
  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since both responses interrogate different aspects of my article “The screen as an in-between” (Vanderbeeken 2011), I will address them separately. Vanhoutte rightly questions the affinities of my theses with Luddism, Orwell and Baudrillard’s theoretical terrorism. My reply discusses why these reactionary positions are currently out of joint. Hoens rightly questions my interpretation of the notion ‘passion for the real’ and whether the examples discussed delineate the specificity of new media. My reply discusses how I take this notion as a starting point for an analysis that complements rather then criticises Badiou and Žižek and how the apparent resemblance between old and new media in fact entails significant differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Hoens, D. (2011). What is new about new media? Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-011-9256-5.

  • Vanderbeeken R. (2011) The screen as an in-between. Foundations of Science 16(2–3): 245–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhoutte, K. (2011). Luddite interventions: On the poetics of catastrophe and the art of criticism. Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-011-9257-4.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robrecht Vanderbeeken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vanderbeeken, R. Virtual Invaders. Found Sci 18, 159–164 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9255-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9255-6

Keywords

Navigation