Abstract
The practice of theoretical research in chemistry largely consists in the construction of models without which experimentation would be impossible. The best-known theoretical models in chemistry are those of the molecular structures of chemical compounds. What is the correspondence between these models and the unobservable entities that they are meant to explain? What is the ontological status of molecular models? The anti-realists question the basis of the realists’ belief in these entities and the truth claims regarding them. Ultimately, the realist/anti-realist debate points to the question of the scope of scientific knowledge. In this paper, I shall show that the description of natural entities offered by the contemporary scientific worldview reveals that molecular modeling presupposes a realistic epistemology that recognizes the limits of scientific objectification.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artigas, M.: Los límites del lenguaje científico. In: Ortiz, J.M. (ed.) Veinte claves para la nueva era, pp. 113–131. Rialp, Madrid (1992)
Artigas, M.: La naturaleza de la verdad parcial. In: Martínez, R. (ed.) La verità scientifica, pp. 101–111. Armando Editore, Roma (1995a)
Artigas, M.: La inteligibilidad de la naturaleza. EUNSA, Pamplona (1995b)
Artigas, M.: Filosofía de la Naturaleza. EUNSA, Pamplona (1998)
Artigas, M.: Filosofía de la ciencia experimental. EUNSA, Pamplona (1999)
Artigas, M.: Filosofía de la ciencia. EUNSA, Pamplona (2006)
Artigas, M.: Filosofía de la ciencia. EUNSA, Pamplona (2009)
Chalmers, A.: Atomism from the 17th to the 20th century. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2014 edn. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/atomism-modern/. (2014). Accessed 21 June 2019
Del Re, G.: Ontological status of molecular structure. HYLE 4, 81–103 (1998)
Del Re, G.: Models and analogies in science. HYLE 6, 5–15 (2000)
Francoeur, E.: The forgotten tool: the design and use of molecular models. Soc. Stud. Sci. 27(1), 7–40 (1997)
Francoeur, E.: Beyond dematerialization and inscription. Does the materiality of molecular models really matter? HYLE 6, 63–84 (2000)
Laszło, P.: Chemical analysis as dematerialization. HYLE 4, 29–38 (1998)
Perrin, J.: La chimie physique. Rev Metaphys Morale 37(1), 17–26 (1930)
Quine, W.: Word and Object. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1960)
Ramberg, P.J.: Pragmatism, belief, and reduction. Stereoformulas and atomic models in early stereochemistry. HYLE 6, 35–61 (2000)
Schummer, J.: The methodological pluralism of chemistry and its philosophical implications. In: Scerri, E.R., McIntyre, L. (eds.) Philosophy of Chemistry: Review of a Current Discipline, pp. 57–72. Springer, Dordrecht (2014)
Zeidler, P.: The epistemological status of theoretical models of molecular structure. HYLE 6, 17–34 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
García Zerecero, G. Molecular models and scientific realism. Found Chem 22, 467–476 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-020-09363-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-020-09363-7