Abstract
This article ties together two different sources related to the Trial of Pussy Riot in Russia in 2012. On the one hand, I consider legal documents, such as court proceedings, police reports, and the sentence. On the other, I analyse a life-history interview with one of the accused, thus giving her a voice that is not mediated by juridical institutions within criminal law procedure. This allows an analysis of two different subject positions produced by these texts: a conformist citizen and a feminist activist-citizen. I pay more attention to the latter. I conclude that in order to retain an activist position, the feminist subject has no option but to resist.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Videos are available on Pussy Riot’s blog: http://pussy-riot.livejournal.com/ (Accessed 24 January 2015). This page still belongs to anonymous participants of Pussy Riot, while those whose personal data was revealed during the hearings were blamed for breaking the solidarity of the group once they started the attempts to participate in capitalist production using Pussy Riot as a brand name (this at least regards Alyokhina and Tolokonnikova).
All documents in Russian are given in my translation.
See, http://pussy-riot.livejournal.com/12442.html (Accessed 24 January 2015); http://youtu.be/GCasuaAczKY (Accessed 24 January 2015). The appeal to the Virgin Mary was hardly so well-thought of by participants of Pussy Riot. As my interviewee said, none of them was religious, and generally they did not expect this particular action would provoke such a huge attention. Yet, in terms of gender, motherhood, and religion, the figure of the Virgin Mary seems to be important and will be discussed further.
In Russia, a criminal offence committed by a group in conspiracy leads to an increase in sentence. Though the actual deed or consequences of the activity remain the same, the law dictates that having criminal accomplices renders all of those involved somehow more responsible for their actions.
Ambo is a space in front of the central doors of iconostasis, and solea is a walkway in front of the iconostasis (central wall full of icons in an orthodox church).
This action was staged at the Biological Museum in 2008 and was supposed to show that the presidential candidacy of Dmitry Medvedev was a mockery of the political process. Critical commentators would agree that the performance used patriarchal and homophobic images so far as the sexual intercourse represented that just like a man penetrates a woman in her anus, the people of Russia were penetrated by the authorities when the Kremlin introduced Medvedev as future president. In Russian language, derogatory terms “ebat’” (to fuck) and “naebat’” (to cheat) have the same grammatical root. In imperative form (“ebis’”) this verb is used for the title of the performance.
Public process refers to a situation when criminal case is opened without a victim’s plea, because the case endangers other people (the public). Private–public processes are those that are opened by a victim’s official plea to the police, though they are not closed even if the victim changes her/his mind.
USSR legacy of atheist policy dictates that people are not born into religion but they choose to become or not a member of a church later in their life. People are thus distinguished between those who are ‘in-church’, and those who are outside. This word conveys the status of being ‘in-church’.
This is given to outstanding students in the Russian school system who have achieved the best marks for all subjects.
References
Barrett, Michele. 1997. Words and things: Materialism and method in contemporary feminist analysis. In Feminisms, ed. Sandra Kemp, and Judith Squires, 112–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benhabib, Seyla. 2002. The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Browyn, Kara Conrad. 2006. Neo-institutionalism, social movements, and the cultural reproduction of a mentalité: Promise keepers reconstruct the madonna/whore complex. The Sociological Quarterly 47 (2): 305–331.
Brown, Wendy. 2006. Regulating aversion: Tolerance in the age of identity and empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. London: Routledge.
Clément, Carine. 2015. Unlikely mobilisations: How ordinary Russian people become involved in collective action. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 2 (3–4): 211–240.
Constitution of the Russian Federation. 1993.
Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. 1996.
Dreyfus, Hubert, and Paul Rabinow. 1983. Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Epstein, Alec. 2012. Arest uchastnits ‘Pussy Riot’ kak katalizator hudoshestvenno-grazhdanskogo aktivizma [Arrest of ‘Pussy Riot’ participant as a source of social art activism]. Neprikosnovenny zapas 4: 104–119.
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The history of sexuality, vol. 1. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, Michel. 2008. The birth of biopolitics. Lectures at the College de france 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gan, Gregory. 2015. Soaring to dizzying heights: Christ the Saviour Cathedral as a historical arena for the persecution of Pussy Riot. Critique of Anthropology 35 (2): 166–186.
Gapova, Elena. 2015. Becoming visible in the digital age. Feminist Media Studies 15 (1): 18–35.
Gessen, Masha. 2014. Words will break cement: The passion of pussy riot. New York: Riverhead Books.
Harding, Sandra. 1987. Is there a feminist method? In Feminism and methodology, ed. Sandra Harding, 1–14. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Hendley, Kathryn. 2013. Too much of a good thing? Assessing access to civil justice in Russia. Slavic Review 72 (4): 802–827.
Isin, Engin. 2008. Theorizing acts of citizenship. In Acts of citizenship, ed. Engin Isin, and Greg Nielsen, 15–43. London: Zed Books.
Johnson, Janet Elise. 2014. Pussy Riot as a feminist project: Russia’s gendered informal politics. Nationalities Papers 42 (4): 583–590.
Kondakov, Alexander. 2014. The silenced citizens of Russia: Exclusion of non-heterosexual subjects from rights-based citizenship. Social & Legal Studies 23 (2): 151–174.
Kondakov, Alexander. 2013. Resisting the silence: The use of tolerance and equality arguments by gay and lesbian activist groups in Russia. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 28 (3): 403–424.
Kondakov, Alexander. 2012. An essay on feminist thinking in Russia: To be born a feminist. Oñati Socio-Legal Series 2 (7): 33–47.
Kostyuchenko, Elena. 2012. Sedmoy den slushaniy po delu Pussy Riot [The Seventh Day of Pussy Riot Hearings]. Novaya Gazeta. http://www.novayagazeta.ru/news/58806.html?p=5. Accessed 7 August 2012.
Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Miryasova, Olga. 2014. Russia’s workers in the mining and metallurgical sector: Perceptions and activities on the eve of a new political cycle. The Journal of Social Policy Studies 12 (2): 261–274.
Mitrokhin, Nikolay. 2004. Russkaya pravoslavnaya tserkov: sovremennoe sostoyanie i aktualnye problemy [Russian Orthodox Church: Current State and Challenges]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
Muravyeva, Marianna. 2014. Traditional values and modern families: Legal understanding of tradition and modernity in contemporary Russia. The Journal of Social Policy Studies 12 (4): 625–638.
Ong, Aihwa. 1996. Cultural citizenship as subject-making. Immigrants negotiate racial and cultural boundaries in the United States. Cultural Anthropology 37 (5): 737–762.
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The sexual contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Semenov, Andrey. 2016. Ot ekonomicheskogo krizisa k politicheskomu? Dinamika protestnykh trebovaniy v rossiyskikh regionakh (2008–2012 gg.) [From economic crisis to political? Dynamics of protest demands in Russia (2011–2012)]. The Journal of Social Policy Studies 14 (2): 151–166.
Sharafutdinova, Gulnaz. 2014. The Pussy Riot affair and Putin’s demarche from sovereign democracy to sovereign morality. Nationalities Papers 42 (4): 616–621.
Sperling, Valerie. 2014. Sex, politics, and Putin: Political legitimacy in Russia. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Stähle, Hanna. 2015. Digital orthodoxy: Mediating post-secularity in Russia. Digital Icons 14: 49–71.
Stanley, Liz. 1990. Recovering women in history from feminist deconstructionism. Women’s Studies International Forum 13 (1–2): 151–157.
Turner, Brian. 2001. The erosion of citizenship. British Journal of Sociology 52 (2): 189–209.
Valverde, Mariana. 2010. Practices of citizenship and scales of governance. New Criminal Law Review 13 (2): 216–240.
Volkov, Vadim. 2014. Vliyanie statusa podsudimogo na reshenie suda [Influence of status of the accused on the sentence]. Zhurnal sotsyologii i sotsyalnoy antropologii [Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology] 17 (4): 62–85.
Volkov, Vadim, and Aryna Dzmitryieva. 2015. Recruitment patterns, gender, and professional subcultures of the judiciary in Russia. Journal International Journal of the Legal Profession 22 (2): 166–192.
Walby, Sylvia. 1994. Is citizenship gendered? Sociology 28 (2): 379–395.
Yusupova, Marina. 2014. Pussy Riot: A feminist band lost in history and translation. Nationalities Papers 42 (4): 604–610.
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1997. Women, citizenship and difference. Feminist Review 57: 4–27.
Zdravomyslova, Elena. 2004. Gendernoye grazhdanstvo v sovetskoy Rossii – praktiki abortov [Gendered citizenship in Soviet Russia: Practices of abortion]. In Razvitie gosudarstva blagosostoyaniya v Severnoy Evrope i Rossii [Development of Welfare State in Northern Europe and Russia], ed. Irina Grigorieva, 179–195. St. Petersburg: Skifia-Print.
Acknowledgements
Some ideas presented in this article were previously discussed at the Congress of the ISA Committee on the Sociology of Law “Law and Political Action” (University of Toulouse, France) and the workshop “Religion, Law and Policy Making” (University of Tartu, Estonia). The author would like to thank anonymous peer-reviewers and the editors of the Journal for their valuable comments, Matthew Blackburn for his help with English, and Ekaterina Samutsevich for her openness and valor.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kondakov, A. The Feminist Citizen-Subject: It’s not About Choice, It’s About Changing It All. Fem Leg Stud 25, 47–69 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-017-9341-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-017-9341-4