Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Establishing existence and uniqueness of solutions to the boundary value problem involving a generalized Emden equation, embracing Thomas–Fermi-like theories

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to construct a firm mathematical foundation for the boundary value problem associated with a generalized Emden equation that embraces Thomas–Fermi-like theories. Boundary value problems for the relativistic and non-relativistic Thomas–Fermi equations are included as special cases. Questions of existence and uniqueness of solutions to these boundary value problems form a fundamental and important area of investigation regarding whether these mathematical models for physical phenomena are actually well-posed. However, these questions have remained open for the generalized Emden problem and the relativistic Thomas–Fermi problem. Herein we advance current understanding of existence and uniqueness of solutions by proving that these boundary value problems each admit a unique solution. Our methods involve an analysis of the problems through arguments that apply differential inequalities and fixed-point theory. The new results guarantee the existence of a unique solution, ensuring the generalized Emden equation that embraces Thomas–Fermi theory sits on a firm mathematical foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fermi E (1927) Un metodo statistico per la determinazione di alcune priorietà dell’atome (In Italian). Rend Addad Naz Lincei 6:602–607

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas LH (1927) The calculation of atomic fields. Proc Camb Philos Soc 23:542–548

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Akkermans E, Ghosh S, Musslimani ZH (2008) Numerical study of one-dimensional and interacting Bose–Einstein condensates in a random potential. J Phys B 41:045302

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bautista MA (2008) Electronic correlations and polarizability of the Thomas–Fermi–Dirac–Amaldi potential: applications to the singly ionized iron-peak species. J Phys B 41:065701

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bénilan P, Brézis H (2003) Nonlinear problems related to the Thomas–Fermi equation. Dedicated to Philippe Bénilan. J Evol Equ 3(4):673–770

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Benguria R, Leib EH (1978) Many-body atomic potentials in Thomas–Fermi theory. Ann Phys NY 110:34–45

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Benguria R, Brézis H, Leib EH (1981) The Thomas–Fermi–von Weizsäcker theory of atoms and molecules. Commun Math Phys 79(2):167–180

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Benguria R, Leib EH (1978) The positivity of the pressure in Thomas–Fermi theory. Commun Math Phys 63:193–218

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhaduri RK, Murthy VMN, Brack M (2008) Fermionic ground state at unitarity and Haldane exclusion statistics. J Phys B 41:115301

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brézis H (1978) Nonlinear problems related to the Thomas–Fermi equation. Contemporary developments in continuum mechanics and partial differential equations. In: Proceedings of international symposium, Institute of Mathematics, University of Federo Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (1977) pp 81–89, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, 30. North-Holland, Amsterdam

  11. Brézis H (1979) Nonlinear equations of Thomas–Fermi type. In: Proceedings of the first Franco-Southeast Asian mathematical conference, Nanyang University, Singapore, 1979. Southeast Asian Bull. Mathematics Special Issue, pp 167–171

  12. Brézis H (1980) Some variational problems of the Thomas–Fermi type. Variational inequalities and complementarity problems. In: Proceedings of International School, Erice (1978). Wiley, Chichester, pp 53–73

  13. Brézis H, (1980) A free boundary problem in quantum mechanics: Thomas–Fermi equation. Free boundary problems, Vol II, Pavia (1979) Ist. Naz, Alta Mat Francesco Severi, Rome, pp 85–91

  14. Brézis H, Leib EH (1979) Long range atomic potentials in Thomas–Fermi theory. Commun Math Phys 65(3):231–246

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Carancanhas MA, Seman JA, Ramos ERF, Henn EAL, Magalhaes KMF, Helmerson K, Bagnato VS (2009) Finite temperature correction to the Thomas–Fermi approximation for a Bose–Einstein condensate: comparison between theory and experiment. J Phys B 42:145304

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dirac PAM (1930) Note on the exchange phenomena in the Thomas atom. Proc Camb Philos Soc 26:376–385

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Glossman MD, Castro EA (1987) Approximate analytical solution of the Thomas–Fermi equation for positive ions in a strong magnetic field. Z Phys D 6:81–82

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta M, Krishna KR (2008) An analytical approach for the nonlinear modified Thomas–Fermi equation to derive the ground-state and dynamic properties of a spherically and cylindrically trapped Bose–Einstein condensate. J Phys B 41:195302

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hille E (1969) On the Thomas–Fermi equation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 62:7–10

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kadomstev BB (1970) Heavy atom in an ultrastrong magnetic field. Sov Phys JETP 31(5):945–947

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kornev AS, Zon BA (2003) Rydberg spectra of atoms and positive ions in the Thomas–Fermi model. J Phys B 36(19):4027–4034

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leib EH, Solovej JP, Yngvason J (1994) Asymptotics of heavy atoms in high magnetic fields: I. Lowest Landau band regions. Commun Pure Appl Math 47:513–591

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Leib EH, Solovej JP, Yngvason J (1994) Asymptotics of heavy atoms in high magnetic fields: II. Semiclassical regions. Commun Math Phys 161:77–124

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Leib EH (1975) Thomas–Fermi and Hartree–Fock theory. In: Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians, Vancouver, BC, 1974, Vol 2, pp 383–386. Canadian Mathematical Congress, Montreal, Quebec

  25. Leib EH (1976) The stability of matter. Rev Mod Phys 48:553–569

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Leib EH, Simon B (1973) Thomas–Fermi theory revisited. Phys Rev Lett 31:681–683

    Google Scholar 

  27. Leib EH, Simon B (1977) The Thomas–Fermi theory of atoms, molecules and solids. Adv Math 23:22–116

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Msezane AZ, Felfi Z, Sokolovski D (2008) Near-threshold resonances in electron elastic scattering cross sections for Au and Pt atoms: identification of electron affinities. J Phys B 41:105201

    Google Scholar 

  29. Penna ALA, Diniz JB, Oliveria FA (2009) Charge degeneracy removal in the screened hydrogen atom. J Phys B 42(21):215001

    Google Scholar 

  30. Parand P, Delkosh M (2017) Accurate solution of the Thomas–Fermi equation using the fractional order of rational Chebyshev functions. J Comput Appl Math 317:624–642

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. March NH (1992) Electron density theory of atoms and molecules. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hill SH, Grout PJ, March NH (1983) Chemical potential and total energy of heavy positive ions in extremely strong magnetic fields, near the weak ionisation limit. J Phys B 16:2301–2307

    Google Scholar 

  33. Skjervold JE, Ostgaard E (1984) Heavy atoms in superstrong magnetic fields. Phys Scr 29:543–550

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vallarta MS, Rosen N (1932) The relativistic Thomas–Fermi atom. Phys Rev 41:708–712

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Lowry VC, van Gorder RA (2017) Asymptotic solutions for a relativistic formulation of the generalized nonextensive Thomas–Fermi model. Ann Phys 376:311–323

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Ourabah K, Tribeche M (2014) Relativistic formulation of the generalized nonextensive Thomas–Fermi model. Physica A 393:470–474

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Hill SH, Grout PJ, March NH (1985) Relativistic Thomas–Fermi equation in an extremely high magnetic field, and its solution for atomic ions. J Phys B 18:4665–4673

    Google Scholar 

  38. March NH (2000) A proposed generalization of Emden’s differential equation to embrace the ground-state electronic structure of extremely heavy positive atomic ions with and without applied magnetic fields. University of Trieste International Centre of Theoretical Physics Trieste, IC/2000/96, 10 pp

  39. Hill SH, Grout PJ, March NH (1984) Relativistic total energy and chemical potential of heavy atoms and positive ions. J Phys B 17:4819–4831

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tisdell CC, Holzer M (2015) Analysis of the boundary value problem associated with the nonrelativistic Thomas–Fermi equation for heavy atoms in intense magnetic fields. Differ Equ Appl 7(1):27–41

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. March NH, Nieto LM (2001) Some specific solutions of a generalized Emden equation, embracing Thomas–Fermi-like theories. J Phys A 34:L341–L345

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Tisdell CC (2017) Rethinking pedagogy for second-order differential equations: a simplified approach to understanding well-posed problems. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 48(5):794–801

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Zeidler E (1986) Nonlinear functional analysis and its applications. I. Fixed-point theorems (Translated from the German by Peter R. Wadsack). Springer, New York

  44. Protter MH, Weinberger HF (1984) Maximum principles in differential equations (corrected reprint of the 1967 original). Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  45. O’regan D (1994) Theory of singular boundary value problems. World Scientific Publishing Co Inc., River Edge, NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Aslefallah M, Rostamy D (2019) Application of the singular boundary method to the two-dimensional telegraph equation on arbitrary domains. J Eng Math 118:1–14

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Chapko R, Mindrinos L (2019) On the non-linear integral equation approach for an inverse boundary value problem for the heat equation. J Eng Math 119:255–268

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Gonzales-Santander JL (2019) Asymptotic expansions for the ground heat transfer due to a borehole heat exchanger with a Neumann boundary condition. J Eng Math 117:47–64

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Gorbushin N, Nguyen V-H, Parnell WJ, Assier RC, Naili S (2019) Transient thermal boundary value problems in the half-space with mixed convective boundary conditions. J Eng Math 114:141–158

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Tisdell CC (2019) On Picard’s iteration method to solve differential equations and a pedagogical space for otherness. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 50(5):788–799

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. Rabago JFT, Azegami H (2019) An improved shape optimization formulation of the Bernoulli problem by tracking the Neumann data. J Eng Math 117:1–29

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mathematics & Statistics, The University of New South Wales, UNSW, Sydney, 2052, Australia

    Saleh S. Almuthaybiri & Christopher C. Tisdell

  2. Department of Mathematics, College of Science and Arts in Uglat Asugour, Qassim University, Buraydah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Saleh S. Almuthaybiri

Authors
  1. Saleh S. Almuthaybiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher C. Tisdell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher C. Tisdell.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Almuthaybiri, S.S., Tisdell, C.C. Establishing existence and uniqueness of solutions to the boundary value problem involving a generalized Emden equation, embracing Thomas–Fermi-like theories. J Eng Math 124, 1–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-020-10055-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-020-10055-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation