Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial soil loss prediction impacted by long-term land use/land cover change: a case study of Swat District

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil erosion is a destructive consequence of land degradation caused by deforestation, improper farming practices, overgrazing, and urbanization. This irreversible effect negatively impacts the limited renewable soil resource, causing soil truncation, reduced fertility, and unstable slopes. To address the anticipation of erosion modulus resulting from long-term land use and land cover (LULC) changes, a study was conducted in the Swat District of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Kpk), Pakistan. The study aimed to predict and evaluate soil erosion concerning these changes using remote sensing (RS), geographic information systems (GIS), and the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) model. We also evaluated the impact of the Billion Tree Tsunami Project (BTTP) on soil erosion in the region. Model inputs, such as rainfall erosivity factor, topography factor, land cover and management factor, and erodibility factor, were used to calculate soil erosion. The results revealed that significant soil loss occurred under 2001, 2011, and 2021 LULC conditions, accounting for 67.26%, 61.78%, and 65.32%, falling within the category of low erosion potential. The vulnerable topographical features of the area indicated higher erosion modulus. The maximum soil loss rates observed in 2001, 2011, and 2021 were 80 t/ha−1/year−1, 120 t/ha−1/year−1, and 96 t/ha−1/year−1, respectively. However, the observed reduction in soil loss in 2021 as compared to 2001 and 2011 suggests a positive influence of the BTTP on soil conservation efforts. This study underscores the potential of afforestation initiatives like the BTTP in mitigating soil erosion and highlights the significance of environmental conservation programs in regions with vulnerable topography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the helpful suggestions made by the reviewers who wished to remain anonymous.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, Muhammad Haseeb and Zainab Tahir. Methodology, Muhammad Haseeb and Zainab Tahir. Software, Muhammad Haseeb, and Zainab Tahir. Validation, Muhammad Haseeb, Syed Amer Mahmood, Muhammad Umar Farooq, Saira Batool, and Zainab Tahir. Formal analysis, Muhammad Haseeb, Muhammad Umar Farooq, and Syed Amer Mahmood. Investigation, Muhammad Haseeb. Original draft preparation, Muhammad Haseeb and Zainab Tahir. Review and editing, Muhammad Haseeb, Muhammad Umar Farooq, Syed Amer Mahmood, Saira Batool, and Zainab Tahir. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Haseeb.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All authors have read, understood, and have complied as applicable with the statement on “Ethical responsibilities of Authors” as found in the Instructions for Authors and are aware that with minor exceptions, no changes can be made to authorship once the paper is submitted.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haseeb, M., Tahir, Z., Mahmood, S.A. et al. Spatial soil loss prediction impacted by long-term land use/land cover change: a case study of Swat District. Environ Monit Assess 196, 37 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-12200-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-12200-x

Keywords

Navigation