Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The assessment of the relationship between various waterscapes and outdoor activities: Edirne, Turkey

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The environment is very important in terms of the behaviours and actions of human beings, and activity–environment correlation is used frequently in outdoor arrangements. The environment must meet the requirements and expectations of society. Outdoor activities are the activities that contribute to the well-being of human beings in physical (heartbeat, respiration, blood pressure, etc.) (Ulrich, Journal of Environmental Psychology 11:210–230, 1991), psychological (fear, anxiety, depression, loneliness, stress, etc.) (Marcus and Barnes 1999) and behavioural (insomnia, nervousness, restlessness, passivity, etc.) (Ulrich 1999) terms. It is known that human beings are affected significantly by the environments they are in, and more importantly, it is known that the environment they are in affects their happiness status. The causes of this effect are the features and appearances of the spatial elements and components that mainly make up such environments. One of the elements that is used frequently in landscape is water. If one examines designed or natural open spaces, it may be observed that water has very distinctive features. Dynamic (in the form of a leak, with intense flow rate, cascade, foamy, squirting, jet, graded, etc.) and still water elements may be used with sculptures, plants, rocks and elevations (on land). This study aims to reveal which age groups of students enjoy the different types of activities with regards to water features and emotional associations that motion and characteristics of water bring out in human beings and also to reveal the water preferences of human beings, including their reasons for such preference. Thus, 20 different water compositions located in Edirne Province were selected, and in 2-min camera reels, the students of various age groups assessed water with various characteristic features via a survey. As a result, it was revealed that human beings from various age groups wish to perform different activities with water elements having distinctive characteristic features, and the types of water elements that are subject to various age groups’ like and dislike were determined. Kruskal–Wallis test was used during testing the effect of age differences. Chi-square analysis was used in order to examine the effect of age differences on preferences with regards to the activities that shall be performed at locations that include utilization of various water elements. The results reveal that while the use of water should be allowed in landscaping, selections regarding the elements of these water features should be made based on the type of activity and the age group of users in relation to the location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, R. E., Crespo, C. J., Bartlett, S. J., Cheskin, L. J., & Pratt, M. (1998). Relationship of physical activity and television watching with body weight and level of fatness among children. Journal of American Medical Association, 279(12), 938–942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. M., Mulligan, B. E., Goodman, L. S., & Regen, H. Z. (1983). Effects of sound on preferences for outdoor settings. Environment and Behavior, 15, 539–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astrand, P.O.: 1987, Exercise physiology and its role in disease prevention and in rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68, 5, 1, 305–9.

  • Blair, S. N., Kohl, H. W., Paffenberger, R. S., Clark, D. G., Cooper, K. H., & Gibbons, L. W. (1989). Physical fitness and all-cause mortality, a prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA, 262, 2395–2401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, N. (1983). Basic elements of landscape architecture design. New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. C., & Daniel, T. C. (1987). Context effects in perceived environmental quality assessments: scene selection and landscape quality ratings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 7, 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. C., & Daniel, T. C. (1991). Landscape aesthetics of riparian environments: relationships of flow quantity to scenic quality along a wild and scenic river. Water Resource Research, 27, 1787–1795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burmill, S., Danial, T. C., & Hetherington, J. D. (1999). Human values and perception of water in arid landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44(2), 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M., H.: 1994, An informational approach to preference of urban waterscapes, Los Angeles, CA

  • Clay, G. R., & Daniel, T. C. (2000). Scenic landscape assessment: the effects of land management jurisdiction on public perception of scenic beauty. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49(1–2), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. H. (1983). The psychology of the large scale environment. In N. R. Feimer & E. S. Geller (Eds.), Environmental psychology, directions and perspectives (pp. 47–105). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowhurst-Lennard, S. H., & Lennard, H. (1987). Livable cities: people and places: social and design principle for the future of the city. Southampton: Gondolier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, T.C. and Boster, R.S.: 1976, Measuring landscape esthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colo:U.S., 66p.

  • Dilani, A.: 2001, Design and health: the therapeutic benefits of design. Stockholm.

  • Fjörtoft, I., & Sageie, J. (2000). The natural environment as a playground for children: landscape description and analyses of a natural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(1), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannebaum, I., G.: 1998, Landscape design: a practical approach (4th edn), Upper Saddle River, N., Prentice-Hall.

  • Herrington, S., & Studtmann, K. (1998). Landscape interventions: new directions for the design of children's play environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42, 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershberger, R., G. & Cass, R.: 1974, Predicting user responses to buildings. in: G. Davis and D. Vachon (eds), Field applications, pp. 117–134, volume 4 of Carson, H. (Ed.) Man-Environment Interactions: EDRA 5: Evaluations and Applications (Washington, DC, Environmental Design Research Association.

  • Herzog, T. R. (2005). A cognitive analysis of preference for waterscapes. Grand Valley State College, Allendale, Michigan, USA: Department of Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, J. (1991). Representing the environment: visual surrogates in environmental assessment. Healthy Environments, 22, 246–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, & Shu-Chun, L. (1998). A study of people’s perception of waterscapes in built environments. Texas: Texas A&M University. Doctor of Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, R. B., & Stewart, W. P. (1992). Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgements. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, B., Gardsell, P., Jahnell, O., Sernbo, I., & Gullberg, B. (1993). Lifestyle and different fracture prevalence. Calcified Tissue International, 52, 425–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (1987). Mental fatigue and the designed environment. In J. Harvry & D. Henning (Eds.), ELN: public environments (pp. 55–60). Edmond: Environmental Design Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. and Kaplan, S.: 1989, Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective, New York: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kellomaki, S., & Savolainen, R. (1984). The scenic value of the forest landscape as assessed in the field and the laboratory. Landscape Planning, 11, 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küller R. and Küller M.: 1994, The urban open green spaces, old people’s outdoor activities and health. Swedish, R24, Stockholm.

  • Küller, R., & Lindsten, C. (1992). Health and behavior of children in classroom with and without windows. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küller, R., & Wetterberg, L. (1996). The subterranean work environment: impact on well-being and health. Environment International, 22, 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, C. S., & Zube, E. H. (1983). Effects of photographic composition on landscape perception. Landscape Research, 8, 22–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. A. (1990). Gardening as healing process. In R. Hester & M. Francis (Eds.), The meanings of gardens: idea, place, and action (pp. 244–251). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. A. (1994). The evolutionary importance of people-plant relationships. In J. Flagler & R. P. Poincelot (Eds.), People-plant relationships: setting research priorities. Binghamton, NY: Food Products Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. (1987). The economic value of in stream flows: methodology and benefit estimates for optimum flows. Journal of Environmental Management, 24, 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, T. (2001). Stress: a physiological defense reaction. Swedish, 3, 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, C.: 2001, Gardens and health, the therapeutic benefits of design. in: A. Dilani (eds), Design & Health, pp. 61–71.

  • Marcus, C. C., & Barnes, M. (1999). Healing gardens: therapeutic benefits and design recommendations. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulley, E. B. (1976). Water, pools and fountains. In J. D. Carpenter (Ed.), Handbook of landscape architectural construction (pp. 479–498). Washington, DC: The Landscape Architecture Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasar, J. L. (1998). The evaluative image of the city. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasar, J., & Yı-H, L. (2003). Evaluative responses to five kinds of water features, short communication. Landscape Research, 28(4), 441–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir, A., & Yılmaz, O. (2008). Assessment of outdoor school environments and physical activity in Ankara's primary schools. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(3), 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paffenberger, R. S., and Asnes, D. P.: 1994, Chronic disease in former college students. American College of Sports Medicine 40, Annual Lectures, pp. 93-109

  • Palmer, J. F., & Hoffman, R. E. (2001). Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1–4), 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate, R. (1995). Physical activity and public health. JAMA, 273, 402–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perk, J. (1998). Older patients receive the same benefits from exercise as do younger patients. Swedish, 95, 3778–3784.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, B. (1999). Culture in health care vis-a-vis health care as culture. Stockholm: Swedish.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakıcı, Ç.: 2009, Open space therapy unit in psychiatric hospitals: a case study of Ataköy Psychiatric Hospital. PhD Thesis, The University of Karadeniz Technical, Department of Landscape Architecture, Trabzon, Turkey.

  • Simonds, J., O.: 1983, Landscape architecture, second edition. A manual of site planning and design. Chapter 3: Water, Mc Graw-Hill.

  • Sorvig, K. (1991). Water design: special effects. Landscape Architecture, 81(12), 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamps, A. E. (1990). Use of photographs to simulate environments: a meta-analysis. Perceptual Motor Skills, 71, 907–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. R., Middleton, P., Downton, M., & Ely, D. (1984). Judgements of photographs versus field observations in studies of perception and judgement of the visual environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4(4), 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trent, R. B., Neuman, E., & Kvashny, A. (1987). Presentation mode and question formal artifacts in visual assessment research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: some psychological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13, 553–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S. (1984). Views through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S. (1992). Effects of health facility interior design on wellness: theory and scientific research. Journal of Health Care Design, 3, 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S. (1999). Effects of gardens on health outcomes: theory and research. In C. Cooper-Marcus & M. Barnes (Eds.), Healing gardens: therapeutic benefits and design recommendation (pp. 27–86). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zube, E. H. (1974). Cross-disciplinary and intermode agreement on the description and evaluation of landscape resources. Environment and Behavior, 6(1), 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zube, E. H., Simcox, D. E., & Law, C. S. (1987). Perceptual landscape simulations: history and prospect. Landscape Journal, 6, 62–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Kuzeykent Kampüsü, Mühendislik ve Mimarlik Fakültesi, Peyzaj Mimarligi Bölümü, Merkez-Kastamonu, Turkey

    Çiğdem Sakıcı

Authors
  1. Çiğdem Sakıcı
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Çiğdem Sakıcı.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakıcı, Ç. The assessment of the relationship between various waterscapes and outdoor activities: Edirne, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 186, 3725–3741 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3653-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3653-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation