Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

When are historical data sufficient for making watershed-level stream fish management and conservation decisions?

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Addressing landscape-level threats to stream fishes such as habitat and hydrological alterations requires adequate watershed-level species inventories. Where watershed-level ichthyofaunal surveys are prohibitively expensive, existing (historical) data sources may provide an option for compiling species lists. However, it is critical that managers consider potential biases or limitations of species lists compiled from existing data. Here we assess the suitability of species lists compiled from existing data sources for making watershed-level fish management and conservation decisions. For nine Great Lakes watersheds, we developed existing species lists by compiling all available federal and state agency and museum fish survey data. We then compared the size and species composition of existing species lists to current species lists compiled from intensive field surveys, conducted in 2002, of the same watersheds. Species lists compiled from commonly available existing data sources, such as state and federal agency and museum data, missed many species detected during our 2002 field surveys. In most watersheds, more than 10 species were missed (range 5–21) on existing lists. Sampling over multiple years and seasons increased the size of both current (field) and existing species lists. Existing species lists compiled from surveys conducted over multiple years and seasons included an average of 15 species not captured during the 2002 field surveys. However, such multiyear existing datasets are rare and not available for many watersheds. In addition, species lists compiled from older existing surveys (e.g., before 1984) did not accurately represent current species composition of the watersheds and our results indicate several apparent misidentifications or errors on these lists. Lastly, while most game species were detected on existing lists, migratory species and recently introduced species were commonly missed on these lists. We conclude with recommendations for using existing data for watershed-level stream fish management and conservation decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, A. A., Clark, H., Winemiller, K. O., & Edwards, R. J. (1995). Texas freshwater fish assemblages following three decades of environmental change. The Southwestern Naturalist, 40(3), 314–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argent, D. G., Bishop, J. A., Stauffer, J. R. Jr., Carline, R. F., & Myers, W. L. (2003). Predicting freshwater fish distribution using landscape-level variables. Fisheries Research, 60, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, T. M., & Gaston, K. J. (1998). Some methodological issues in macroecology. American Naturalist, 151, 68–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boulinier, T., Nichols, J. D., Sauer, J. R., Hines, J. E., & Pollock, K. H. (1998). Estimating species richness: The importance of heterogeneity in species detectability. Ecology, 79, 1018–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, Z. H., & Freeman, M. C. (1998). Sampling effort and estimates of species richness based on prepositioned area electrofisher samples. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 18, 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. P., Bach, L. B., Ciruna K. A., & Warner, A. T. (2000). Watershed 2000. Watershed-scale abatement of threats to freshwater biodiversity: The Nature Conservancy’s Freshwater Initiative.

  • Colwell, R. K., & Coddington, J. A. (1994). Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 345, 101–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, M. J., & Noon, B. R. (1996). Mapping of species richness for conservation of biological diversity: Conceptual and methodological issues. Ecological Applications, 6, 763–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, H. R., Hayes, D. B., Baylis, J. R., Carl, L. M., Goldstein, J. D., McLaughlin, R. L., et al. (2003). Low-head lamprey barrier effects on stream habitat and fish communities in the Great Lakes basin. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 29(Supplement 1), 386–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild, G. W., Horwitz, R. J., Nieman, D. A., Boyer, M. R., & Knorr, D. F. (1998). Spatial variation and historical change in fish communities of the schuylkill river drainage, Southeast Pennsylvania. American Midland Naturalist, 139, 282–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausch, K. D., Torgersen, C. E., Baxter, C. V., & Li, H. W. (2002). Landscapes to riverscapes: Bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. BioScience, 52, 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, C. J. M. (1989). Fishes. In W. Zeidler & W. F. Ponder (Eds.), Natural history of dalhousie springs (pp. 89–111). Adelaide, Australia: South Australian Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez de Silva, H., & Medellin, R. A. (2001). Evaluating completeness of species lists for conservation and macroecology: A case of Mexican land birds. Conservation Biology, 15, 1384–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green R. H., & Young, R. C. (1993). Sampling to detect rare species. Ecological Applications, 3, 351–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, J. J., & Fowler, G. W. (1999). Bias, precision, and accuracy of four measures of species richness. Ecological Applications, 9, 824–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heltshe, J. F., & Forrester, N. E. (1983). Estimating species richness using the jackknife procedure. Biometrics, 39, 1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kodric-Brown, A., & Brown, J. H. (1993). Incomplete data sets in community ecology and biogeography: A cautionary tale. Ecological Applications, 3, 736–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen, C. (1994). Biological inventory using target taxa: A case study of the butterflies of Madagascar. Ecological Applications, 4, 407–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. (1992). The length of stream to sample with a towed electrofishing unit when fish species richness is estimated. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 12, 198–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandrak, N. E., Jones, M. L., & McLaughlin, R. L. (2003). Evaluation of the Great Lakes fishery commission interim policy on barrier placement. Research Completion Report. Ann Arbor, MI: Great Lakes Fishery Commission.

  • McLaughlin, R. T., Carl, L., Middel, T., Ross, M., Noakes, D. L. G., Hayes, D. B., et al. (2001). Potentials and pitfalls of integrating data from diverse sources: Lessons from a historical database for Great Lakes stream fishes. Fisheries, 26, 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, I., & Beattie, A. J. (1996). Designing a cost-effective invertebrate survey: A test of methods for rapid assessment of biodiversity. Ecological Applications, 6, 594–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. W. (1990). The estimation of species richness by extrapolation. Ecology, 71, 1195–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, T. M., Rahel, F. J., & Hubert, W. A. (1998). Using historical data to assess changes in Wyoming’s fish fauna. Conservation Biology, 12, 1120–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponder, W. F., Carter, G. A., Flemons, P., & Chapman, R. R. (2001). Evaluation of museum collection data for use in biodiversity assessment. Conservation Biology, 15, 648–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porto, L. M., McLaughlin, R. L., & Noakes, D. L. (1999). Low-head barrier dams restrict the movement of fishes in two Great Lakes streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 19, 1028–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. W., & Kwak, T. J. (2003). Fish assemblage changes in an Ozark River after impoundment: A long-term perspective. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 132, 110–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remsen, J. A. (1994). Use and misuse of birdlists in community ecology and conservation. AUK, 111, 225–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. S., Lissimore, T. J., Healey, M. C., & Northcote, T. G. (2000). Fish communities of the lower Fraser River (Canada) and a 21-year contrast. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 59, 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, B. D., Braun, D. P., Mendelson, M. A., & Master, L. L. (1997). Threats to imperiled freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology, 11, 1081–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. M., Davis, F., Csuti, B., Noss, R., Butterfield, B., Groves, C., et al. (1993). Gap analysis: A geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monographs, 123, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. B., Fisher, R. N., & Davidson, C. (1998). The role of natural history collections in documenting species declines. TREE, 13, 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, T. D., & Lyons, J. (1995). Comparison of catch per effort and removal procedures for sampling stream fish assemblages. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 15, 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. S., & Jones, M. J. (2005). Watershed-level sampling effort requirements for determining riverine fish species composition. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62, 1580–1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A. N. (1957). Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. American Geophysical Union Transactions, 38, 913–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernhes, J. R., & Younes, T. (1993). Inventorying and monitoring biodiversity under the Diversitas programme. Biology International, 27, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, M. R., & Taylor, C. M. (1991). Upstream extirpation of four minnow species due to damming of a prairie stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 120, 98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, 13 Natural Resources Building, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Katherine L. Smith & Michael L. Jones

  2. National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of International Affairs, 1315 East–West Highway, Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA

    Katherine L. Smith

Authors
  1. Katherine L. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael L. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine L. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, K.L., Jones, M.L. When are historical data sufficient for making watershed-level stream fish management and conservation decisions?. Environ Monit Assess 135, 291–311 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9650-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9650-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation