Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Determination of the potential implementation impact of 2016 ministry of environmental protection generic assessment criteria for potentially contaminated sites in China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Ministry of Environmental Protection of China issued a 3rd draft edition of risk-based Generic Assessment Criteria (the MEP-GAC) in March 2016. Since these will be the first authoritative GAC in China, their implementation is likely to have a significant impact on China’s growing contaminated land management sector. This study aims to determine the potential implementation impact of the MEP-GAC through an in-depth analysis of the management context, land use scenarios, health criteria values adopted and exposure pathways considered. The MEP-GAC have been proposed for two broad categories of land use scenarios for contaminated land risk assessment, and these two categories of land use scenarios need to be further delved, and a MEP-GAC for Chinese cultivated land scenario ought to be developed, to ensure human health protection of Chinese farmers. The MEP-GAC have adopted 10−6 as the acceptable lifetime cancer risk, given the widespread extent and severe level of land contamination in China, consideration should be given to the decision on excess lifetime cancer risk of 10−5. During risk assessment process in practice, it is better to review the 20% TDI against local circumstances to determine their suitability before adopting it. The MEP-GAC are based on a SOM value of 1%, for regions with particularly high SOM, it might be necessary to develop regional GAC, due to SOM’s significant impact on the GAC developed. An authoritative risk assessment model developed based on HJ25.3-2014 would help facilitate the DQRA process in practice. The MEP-GAC could better reflect the likely exposures of China’s citizens due to vapour inhalation by using characteristics of Chinese exposure scenarios, including China-generic building stock, as inputs into the Johnson and Ettinger model as opposed to adoption of the US EPA parameters. The MEP-GAC once implemented will set the trajectory for the development of the investigation, assessment and remediation of land contamination for years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BSI. (2013). BS 10175:2011+A1:2013 Investigation of potentially contaminated sites. Code of practice.

  • CCTV. (2013). China will gradually postpone retirement age. China Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, China. http://www.mohrss.gov.cn/

  • Cheng, Y., & Nathanail, P. C. (2009). Generic Assessment Criteria for human health risk assessment of potentially contaminated land in China. Science of the Total Environment, 408(2), 324–339. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.021.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • China National Environmental Monitoring Center. (1994). The atlas of soil environmental background value in the People’s Republic of China. (C. Zheng, Ed.). Beijing, China: China Enviromental Science Press.

  • Chinese MEP. (2014). Technical guidelines for risk assessment of contaminated sites (HJ25.3-2014, published in Chinese). Beijing, China.

  • Chinese MEP. (2015). Risk screening guideline values for soil contamination of development land (2nd draft ed.). Beijing: Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese MEP. (2016a). Risk screening guideline values for soil contamination of development land (3rd draft edition). Beijing, China.

  • Chinese MEP. (2016b). Supplemental guidance for developing risk screening guidelines (published in Chinese) 3rd draft edition. Beijing, China. http://www.mep.gov.cn

  • CL:AIRE. (2013). Development of category 4 screening levels for assessment of land affected by contamination. SP1010. Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments.

  • Coulon, F., Jones, K., Li, H., Hu, Q., Gao, J., Li, F., et al. (2016). China’s soil and groundwater management challenges: Lessons from the UK’s experience and opportunities for China. Environment International, 91, 196–200. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA. (2006). Assessing risks from land contamination: A proportionate approach. Soil guideline values: The way Forward. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

  • DEFRA. (2008). Guidance on the legal definition of contaminated land. London. http://www.defra.gov.uk

  • DEFRA and Environment Agency. (2002). Soil guideline values for inorganic mercury contamination. R&D Publication SGV5. Bristol: Environment Agency. http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk

  • DEFRA and Environment Agency. (2004). Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination. Bristol: Environment Agency. http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/commondata/105385/model_procedures_881483.pdf.

  • DEFRA and Environment Agency. (2005). Soil guideline values for benzene contamination. R&D Publication SGV12. Bristol: Environment Agency. http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk

  • Environment Agency. (2009a). Human health toxicological assessment of contaminants in soil. Science report–final SC050021/SR2. Bristol: Environment Agency.

  • Environment Agency. (2009b). Updated technical background to the CLEA model. SC050021/SR3. Bristol: Environment Agency.

  • Environment Agency. (2009c). Contaminants in soil: Updated collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans Phenol. Bristol.

  • Environment Agency. (2009d). CLEA software (Version 1.04) handbook. http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/clea. Accessed 19/01/2009. Science Report SC050021/SR4. Bristol: Environment Agency.

  • Ferguson CC (1993) Soil guideline values in the UK. In F. Arendt, G. J. Annokkee, R. Bosman, & W. J. Van denBrink (Eds.), Contaminated Soil’93. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

  • Ferguson, C., Darmendrail, D., Freier, K., Jensen, B. K., Jensen, J., & Kasamas, H., et al. (1998). Risk assessment for contaminated sites in Europe volume 1 scientific basis. Nottingham: LQM Press.

  • Ferguson, C., Nathanail, C. P., McCaffrey, C., Earl, N., Foster, N., Gillett, A., & Ogden, R. (2003). Method for deriving site-specific human health assessment criteria for contaminants in soil.

  • Haney, J. (2015). Consideration of non-linear, non-threshold and threshold approaches for assessing the carcinogenicity of oral exposure to hexavalent chromium. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 73(3), 834–852. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.10.011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hers, I., Zapf-Gilje, R., Johnson, P. C., & Li, L. (2003). Evaluation of the Johnson and Ettinger model for prediction of indoor air quality. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 23(1), 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. E., Sun, Q., & Gibson, J. M. (2014). Updating exposure models of indoor air pollution due to vapour intrusion: Bayesian calibration of the Johnson-Ettinger model. Environmental Science and Technology, 48, 2130–2138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lijzen, J. P. A., Baars, A. J., Otte, P. F., Rikken, M. G. J., Swartjes, F., Verbruggen, E. M. J., & Wezel, A. P. (2001). Technical evaluation of the intervention values for soil/sediment and groundwater human and ecotoxicological risk assessment and derivation of risk limits for soil, aquatic sediment and groundwater. Research forMan and Environment (RIVM). http://www.mnp.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/711701023.pdf

  • MLSS. (1999). Circular on prevention and control of early retirement of enterprise employees issued by Ministry of Labour and Social Security (in Chinese). Ministry of Labour and Social Security of the People’s Republic of China (MLSS).

  • Nathanail, C. P. (2006). Generic and site-specific criteria in assessment of human health risk from contaminated soil. Soil Use and Management, 21, 500–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathanail, C. P., & Bardos, R. P. (2004). Reclamation of contaminated land. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nathanail, C. P., & Earl, N. (2001). Human health risk assessment: Guideline values and magic numbers. Environmental Science and Technology, 16.

  • Nathanail, J., Bardos, P., & Nathanail, P. (2002). Contaminated Land Management: Ready Reference. Nottingham, London: Land Quality Press and EPP Publications Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanail, P., McCaffrey, C., Ashmore, M., Cheng, Y. Y., Gillett, A., Hooker, P., et al. (2007). Generic assessment criteria for human health risk assessment. Nottingham: Land Quality Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanail, P., McCaffrey, C., Ashmore, M., Cheng, Y. Y., Gillett, A., Hooker, P., et al. (2009). The LQM/CIEH generic assessment criteria for human health risk assessment (2nd ed.). Nottingham: Land Quality Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanail, C. P., McCaffrey, C., Gillett, A. G., Ogden, R. C., & Nathanail, J. F. (2015). The LQM/CIEH S4ULs for human health risk assessment. Nottingham: Land Quality Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paustenbach, D. J. (1989). A survey of health risk assessment. In D. J. Paustenbach (Ed.), The risk assessment of environmental hazards: A textbook of case studies. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIVM. (2001). Technical evaluation of the intervention values for soil/sediment and groundwater, human and ecotoxicological risk assessment and derivation of risk limits for soil, aquatic sediment and groundwater. RIVM report 711701 023. Bilthoven: National Institute of Public Health and The Environment.

  • US EPA. (1996). Soil screening guidance: technical background document. EPA/540/R-95/128. Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

  • US EPA. (1997). User’s guide for the Johnson and Ettinger (1991) Model for subsurface vapor intrusion into buildings. Washington, DC.

  • US EPA. (2002). Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites. OSWER 9355.4-24. Washington, DC: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  • US EPA. (2016). Regional screening levels (RSLs): Generic Tables (May 2016). Risk assessment regional screening levels. https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls-generic-tables-may-2016. Accessed 1 April 2017

  • VROM. (2000). Circular on target values and intervention values for soil remediation. DBO/1999226863. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment (VROM).

  • WHO. (2003). Concise international chemical assessment document 50. Elemental Mercury and Inorganic Mercury Compounds: Human Health Aspects. Geneva: World Health Organization.

  • WHO. (2010). WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. Bonn, Germany: In puncto druck+ medien GmbH, 484. doi:10.1186/2041-1480-2-S2-I1

  • Yao, Y., Shen, R., Pennell, K. G., & Suuberg, E. M. (2011). Comparison of the Johnson-Ettinger vapor intrusion screening model predictions with full three-dimensional model results. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 2227–2235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry and Suzhou University of Science and Technology (Project code: XKQ201416).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, China

    Yuanyuan Cheng

  2. School of Geographical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Nottingham, Ningbo Campus, 199 Taikang East Road, Ningbo, 315100, China

    Yu-Ting Tang

  3. School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

    C. Paul Nathanail

Authors
  1. Yuanyuan Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu-Ting Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Paul Nathanail
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuanyuan Cheng.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 121 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, Y., Tang, YT. & Nathanail, C.P. Determination of the potential implementation impact of 2016 ministry of environmental protection generic assessment criteria for potentially contaminated sites in China. Environ Geochem Health 40, 967–985 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-017-9953-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-017-9953-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation