Abstract
In this paper, we react to Lagrange and Kynigos’s contribution to this special issue, in which they present some of their experiences from two cross-case studies in the ReMath project (associated respectively with the use of two dynamic digital artefacts, Casyopée and Cruislet). They described how the project, which involved teams from three different countries (France, Italy and Greece), working in different conditions and relying on different theoretical approaches, was structured in order to address the role played by contextual characteristics. We consider how the ReMath approach of using cross-studies, and especially the inclusion of a cross-analysis phase, served to identify particularities associated with designing and implementing mathematics learning scenarios using digital tools. In their discussion of the process of re-contextualising, one of the factors which appears to have been particularly influential in shaping research activities was theoretical framework and they show how this factor both influences and is influenced by institutional and cultural characteristics. To further explore some of the other important contextual factors they pinpoint, such as the role and engagement of teachers, student characteristics and issues related to the empirical settings, we reflect upon the processes of re-contextualisation that we could identify in our own research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Merriam-Webster online dictionary
Oxford online dictionary
This project was funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (project no. 23038.019444/2009-33). Lulu Healy also received a grant from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico.
References
Boaler, J. (1993). The role of contexts in the mathematics classroom: Do they make mathematics more real? For the Learning of Mathematics, 13(2), 12–17.
Cobb, P., Dean, C., Lamberg, T., Visnovska, J., & Zhao, Q. (2011). The institutional setting of mathematics teaching and learning: Introduction. In E. Yackel, K. Gravemeijer, & A. Sfard (Eds.), A journey in mathematics education research: Insights from the work of Paul Cobb (pp. 199–206). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Cobb, P., McClain, K., Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and school district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24.
Ewing, B. (2005). Discourse and the construction of identity in a community of learning and a community of practice. In T. Stehlik & P. Carden (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Theory as experience (pp. 149–170). Flaxton, Qld: Post Pressed.
Fernandes, S. H. A. A., & Healy, L. (2013). Expressando generalizações em Libras: Álgebra nas mãos de aprendizes surdos [Expressing generalisations in Libras: Algebra in the hands of deaf learners]. Caderno CEDES, 33(91), 349–368.
Fernandes, S. H. A. A., Healy, L., Martins, E. G., Rodrigues, M. A., & Souza, F. R. (2011). Ver e ouvir a matemática com uma calculadora colorida e musical: Estratégias para incluir aprendizes surdos e aprendizes cegos nas salas de aulas [Hearing and seeing mathematics with a colourful and musical calculator: Strategies for including deaf learners and blind learners in the classroom]. In M. D. Pletsh & A. R. Damasceno (Eds.), Educação especial e inclusão escolar: Reflexões sobre o fazer pedagógico (pp. 97–111). Seropédica/RJ: EDUR.
Healy, L. (2006). A developing agenda for research into digital technologies and mathematics education: A view from Brazil. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth ICMI Study Conference: Mathematics education and digital technologies, rethinking the terrain (Vol. 2, pp. 213–220). Hanoi: Hanoi University of Technology.
Healy, L. (2012). Hands that see, hands that speak: Investigating relationships between sensory activity, forms of communicating and mathematical cognition. In Preconference Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 298–316). Seoul: ICMI.
Healy, L., & Fernandes, S. H. A. A. (2011). The role of gestures in the mathematical practices of those who do not see with their eyes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2–3), 157–174.
Healy, L. & Santos, H. F. (2014). Changing perspectives on inclusive mathematics education: Relationships between research and teacher education. Education as Change. doi:10.1080/16823206.2013.877847.
Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Sutherland, R. (1991). Final report of the microworlds project: 1986–1989. Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computing, Institute of Education. London: University of London.
Jahn, A-P. & Healy, L. (2008). Argumentação e prova na sala de aula de matemática: design colaborativo de cenários de aprendizagem [Argumentation and proof in the mathematics classroom: Collaborative design of learning scenarios]. In Anais da 31ª. Reunião anual da ANPED: Constituição Brasileira, Direitos Humanos e Educação. Caxambu, Brazil: ANPED.
Julie, C., Leung, A., Thanh, N. C., Posadas, L., Sacristán, A. I., & Semenov, A. (2010). Some regional developments in access and implementation of digital technologies and ICT. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain (pp. 361–383). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Molyneux-Hodgson, S., Rojano, T., Molyneux, S., Sutherland, R., & Ursini, S. (1999) Mathematical modelling: The interaction of culture and practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics. (Special Issue: Teaching and learning mathematics in context, guest edited by P. Boero), 39(1–3), 167–183.
Moreno-Armella, L., & Sriraman, B. (2005). Structural stability and dynamic geometry: Some ideas on situated proofs. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 37(3), 130–139.
Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Nunes, T., Schliemann, A., & Carraher, D. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Brighton, England: Harvester Press.
Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Papert, S. (2006). From the math wars to the new math. Keynote speech presented at the Seventeenth ICMI Study Conference: Mathematics Education and digital technologies, rethinking the terrain. Hanoi, Vietnam.
Rojano T, Sutherland R, Ursini S, Molyneux S, & Jinich E. (1996). Ways of solving algebra problems: The influence of school culture. In L. Puig and A. Gutierrez (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, 219–226). Valencia, Spain.
Sacristán, A. I. (1997). Windows on the infinite: Constructing meanings in a logo-based microworld. PhD Dissertation. Institute of Education, University of London. http://www.matedu.cinvestav.mx/~asacristan/PhDSacristan97.pdf
Sinclair, N., Healy, L., & Sales, C. O. R. (2009). Time for telling stories: Narrative thinking with dynamic geometry. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(4), 441–452.
Sullivan, P., Zevenbergen, R., & Mousley, J. (2003). The contexts of mathematics tasks and the context of the classroom: Are we including all students. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 107–121.
Sutherland, R., Rojano, T., Mochón, S., Jinich, E,. & Molyneux, S. (1996). Mathematical modelling in the sciences through the eyes of Marina and Adam. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.) Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 291–297). Valencia, Spain.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Healy, L., Sacristán, A.I. Towards an understanding of the shaping of research outcomes by contextual issues: reflections on the contributions of the ReMath project. Educ Stud Math 85, 423–435 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9538-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9538-2