Skip to main content
Log in

Towards an understanding of the shaping of research outcomes by contextual issues: reflections on the contributions of the ReMath project

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we react to Lagrange and Kynigos’s contribution to this special issue, in which they present some of their experiences from two cross-case studies in the ReMath project (associated respectively with the use of two dynamic digital artefacts, Casyopée and Cruislet). They described how the project, which involved teams from three different countries (France, Italy and Greece), working in different conditions and relying on different theoretical approaches, was structured in order to address the role played by contextual characteristics. We consider how the ReMath approach of using cross-studies, and especially the inclusion of a cross-analysis phase, served to identify particularities associated with designing and implementing mathematics learning scenarios using digital tools. In their discussion of the process of re-contextualising, one of the factors which appears to have been particularly influential in shaping research activities was theoretical framework and they show how this factor both influences and is influenced by institutional and cultural characteristics. To further explore some of the other important contextual factors they pinpoint, such as the role and engagement of teachers, student characteristics and issues related to the empirical settings, we reflect upon the processes of re-contextualisation that we could identify in our own research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Merriam-Webster online dictionary

  2. Oxford online dictionary

  3. This project was funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (project no. 23038.019444/2009-33). Lulu Healy also received a grant from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico.

References

  • Boaler, J. (1993). The role of contexts in the mathematics classroom: Do they make mathematics more real? For the Learning of Mathematics, 13(2), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Dean, C., Lamberg, T., Visnovska, J., & Zhao, Q. (2011). The institutional setting of mathematics teaching and learning: Introduction. In E. Yackel, K. Gravemeijer, & A. Sfard (Eds.), A journey in mathematics education research: Insights from the work of Paul Cobb (pp. 199–206). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., McClain, K., Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and school district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, B. (2005). Discourse and the construction of identity in a community of learning and a community of practice. In T. Stehlik & P. Carden (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Theory as experience (pp. 149–170). Flaxton, Qld: Post Pressed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, S. H. A. A., & Healy, L. (2013). Expressando generalizações em Libras: Álgebra nas mãos de aprendizes surdos [Expressing generalisations in Libras: Algebra in the hands of deaf learners]. Caderno CEDES, 33(91), 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, S. H. A. A., Healy, L., Martins, E. G., Rodrigues, M. A., & Souza, F. R. (2011). Ver e ouvir a matemática com uma calculadora colorida e musical: Estratégias para incluir aprendizes surdos e aprendizes cegos nas salas de aulas [Hearing and seeing mathematics with a colourful and musical calculator: Strategies for including deaf learners and blind learners in the classroom]. In M. D. Pletsh & A. R. Damasceno (Eds.), Educação especial e inclusão escolar: Reflexões sobre o fazer pedagógico (pp. 97–111). Seropédica/RJ: EDUR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, L. (2006). A developing agenda for research into digital technologies and mathematics education: A view from Brazil. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth ICMI Study Conference: Mathematics education and digital technologies, rethinking the terrain (Vol. 2, pp. 213–220). Hanoi: Hanoi University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, L. (2012). Hands that see, hands that speak: Investigating relationships between sensory activity, forms of communicating and mathematical cognition. In Preconference Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 298–316). Seoul: ICMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, L., & Fernandes, S. H. A. A. (2011). The role of gestures in the mathematical practices of those who do not see with their eyes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2–3), 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, L. & Santos, H. F. (2014). Changing perspectives on inclusive mathematics education: Relationships between research and teacher education. Education as Change. doi:10.1080/16823206.2013.877847.

  • Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Sutherland, R. (1991). Final report of the microworlds project: 1986–1989. Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computing, Institute of Education. London: University of London.

  • Jahn, A-P. & Healy, L. (2008). Argumentação e prova na sala de aula de matemática: design colaborativo de cenários de aprendizagem [Argumentation and proof in the mathematics classroom: Collaborative design of learning scenarios]. In Anais da 31ª. Reunião anual da ANPED: Constituição Brasileira, Direitos Humanos e Educação. Caxambu, Brazil: ANPED.

  • Julie, C., Leung, A., Thanh, N. C., Posadas, L., Sacristán, A. I., & Semenov, A. (2010). Some regional developments in access and implementation of digital technologies and ICT. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain (pp. 361–383). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux-Hodgson, S., Rojano, T., Molyneux, S., Sutherland, R., & Ursini, S. (1999) Mathematical modelling: The interaction of culture and practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics. (Special Issue: Teaching and learning mathematics in context, guest edited by P. Boero), 39(1–3), 167–183.

  • Moreno-Armella, L., & Sriraman, B. (2005). Structural stability and dynamic geometry: Some ideas on situated proofs. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 37(3), 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Schliemann, A., & Carraher, D. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Brighton, England: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (2006). From the math wars to the new math. Keynote speech presented at the Seventeenth ICMI Study Conference: Mathematics Education and digital technologies, rethinking the terrain. Hanoi, Vietnam.

  • Rojano T, Sutherland R, Ursini S, Molyneux S, & Jinich E. (1996). Ways of solving algebra problems: The influence of school culture. In L. Puig and A. Gutierrez (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, 219–226). Valencia, Spain.

  • Sacristán, A. I. (1997). Windows on the infinite: Constructing meanings in a logo-based microworld. PhD Dissertation. Institute of Education, University of London. http://www.matedu.cinvestav.mx/~asacristan/PhDSacristan97.pdf

  • Sinclair, N., Healy, L., & Sales, C. O. R. (2009). Time for telling stories: Narrative thinking with dynamic geometry. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(4), 441–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., Zevenbergen, R., & Mousley, J. (2003). The contexts of mathematics tasks and the context of the classroom: Are we including all students. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, R., Rojano, T., Mochón, S., Jinich, E,. & Molyneux, S. (1996). Mathematical modelling in the sciences through the eyes of Marina and Adam. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.) Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 291–297). Valencia, Spain.

  • Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lulu Healy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Healy, L., Sacristán, A.I. Towards an understanding of the shaping of research outcomes by contextual issues: reflections on the contributions of the ReMath project. Educ Stud Math 85, 423–435 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9538-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9538-2

Keywords

Navigation