Abstract
Background: The combined use of programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and chemotherapy has reshaped the treatment landscape of advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in a neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced GC (LAGC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with clinical stage II-III GC undergoing neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy were enrolled from December 2019 to July 2022. Clinicopathological characteristics, pathological information, and survival data were recorded and analyzed. Results: A total of 42 eligible patients were enrolled, of whom 37 (88.1%) had clinical stage III disease. All the patients underwent surgery, and the R0 resection rate was 90.5%. Major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR) rates were 42.9% and 26.2%, respectively. The overall TNM downstaging rate was 76.2%. A total of 36 (85.7%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 23.1 months, four patients died after tumor recurrence, and three were alive with recurrence. The 1-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 94.4% and 89.5%, respectively, and the median OS and DFS were not reached. Neoadjuvant treatment was well tolerated with no grade 4–5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) observed. The most common grade 3 TRAEs were anemia and alanine aminotransferase increase (n = 2 each, 9.6%). Conclusions: PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy, with encouraging pCR and survival outcomes in a neoadjuvant setting for patients with LAGC. The combined therapy also showed a good safety profile.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are available upon reasonable request from correspondence author.
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249
Pyo JH, Lee H, Min BH, Lee JH, Choi MG, Lee JH et al (2016) Long-term outcome of endoscopic resection vs. surgery for early gastric Cancer: a non-inferiority-matched cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 111(2):240–249
Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, Goetze TO, Meiler J, Kasper S et al (2019) Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet (London England) 393(10184):1948–1957
Kang YK, Yook JH, Park YK, Lee JS, Kim YW, Kim JY et al (2021) PRODIGY: a phase III study of Neoadjuvant Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and S-1 plus surgery and adjuvant S-1 Versus surgery and adjuvant S-1 for Resectable Advanced Gastric Cancer. J Clin oncology: official J Am Soc Clin Oncol 39(26):2903–2913
Zhang X, Liang H, Li Z, Xue Y, Wang Y, Zhou Z et al (2021) Perioperative or postoperative adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 versus adjuvant oxaliplatin with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy (RESOLVE): an open-label, superiority and non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 22(8):1081–1092
Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP, Conroy T, Bouché O, Lebreton G et al (2011) Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin oncology: official J Am Soc Clin Oncol 29(13):1715–1721
Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M et al (2006) Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355(1):11–20
Schuhmacher C, Gretschel S, Lordick F, Reichardt P, Hohenberger W, Eisenberger CF et al (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: european Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial 40954. J Clin oncology: official J Am Soc Clin Oncol 28(35):5210–5218
An JY, Kim KM, Kim YM, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Noh SH (2012) Surgical complications in gastric cancer patients preoperatively treated with chemotherapy: their risk factors and clinical relevance. Ann Surg Oncol 19(8):2452–2458
Galluzzi L, Humeau J, Buqué A, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G (2020) Immunostimulation with chemotherapy in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nat reviews Clin Oncol 17(12):725–741
Janjigian YY, Shitara K, Moehler M, Garrido M, Salman P, Shen L et al (2021) First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet (London England) 398(10294):27–40
Forde PM, Spicer J, Lu S, Provencio M, Mitsudomi T, Awad MM et al (2022) Neoadjuvant Nivolumab plus Chemotherapy in Resectable Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 386(21):1973–1985
Su J, Guo W, Chen Z, Wang L, Liu H, Zhao L et al (2022) Safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunotherapy: a retrospective cohort study. Front Immunol 13:1078196
Jiang Q, Liu W, Zeng X, Zhang C, Du Y, Zeng L et al (2023) Safety and efficacy of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: real-world experience with a consecutive patient cohort. Front Immunol 14:1122121
Lin JL, Lin JX, Lin JP, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW et al (2021) Safety and Efficacy of Camrelizumab in Combination with Nab-Paclitaxel Plus S-1 for the treatment of gastric Cancer with Serosal Invasion. Front Immunol 12:783243
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213
Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111(5):518–526
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J cancer (Oxford England: 1990) 45(2):228–247
Becker K, Mueller JD, Schulmacher C, Ott K, Fink U, Busch R et al (2003) Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer 98(7):1521–1530
Xue K, Ying X, Bu Z, Wu A, Li Z, Tang L et al (2018) Oxaliplatin plus S-1 or capecitabine as neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer with D2 lymphadenectomy: 5-year follow-up results of a phase II-III randomized trial. Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu. 30(5):516–525
Yu Y, Fang Y, Shen Z, Wang Y, Yan M, Cao H et al (2019) Oxaliplatin plus Capecitabine in the Perioperative treatment of locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma in combination with D2 Gastrectomy: NEO-CLASSIC study. Oncologist 24(10):1311–e989
Wang Y, Cheng X, Cui YH, Hou J, Ji Y, Sun YH et al (2018) Efficacy after preoperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S1 (DOS) in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis. BMC Cancer 18(1):702
Jiang H, Yu X, Li N, Kong M, Ma Z, Zhou D et al (2022) Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant sintilimab, oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: early results of a phase 2 study. J Immunother Cancer. ;10(3)
Yin Y, Lin Y, Yang M, Lv J, Liu J, Wu K et al (2022) Neoadjuvant tislelizumab and tegafur/gimeracil/octeracil (S-1) plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: early results of a phase 2, single-arm trial. Front Oncol 12:959295
D’Ugo D, Persiani R, Rausei S, Biondi A, Vigorita V, Boccia S et al (2006) Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and effects of tumor regression in gastric cancer. Eur J Surg oncology: J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Association Surg Oncol 32(10):1105–1109
Zheng Y, Yang X, Yan C, Feng R, Sah BK, Yang Z et al (2020) Effect of apatinib plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection on pathologic response in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial. Eur J cancer (Oxford England: 1990) 130:12–19
Al-Mansour M, Neal D, Crippen C, Loftus T, Read T, Tighe P (2022) Outcomes of transversus abdominis plane block in ventral hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis using a national database. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg 5(4):179–184
Ikoma N, Estrella JS, Hofstetter W, Das P, Minsky BD, Ajani JA et al (2018) Nodal downstaging in gastric Cancer patients: promising Survival if ypN0 is achieved. Ann Surg Oncol 25(7):2012–2017
Yang F, Wang JF, Wang Y, Liu B, Molina JR (2021) Comparative analysis of predictive biomarkers for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in cancers: Developments and Challenges. Cancers. ;14(1)
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WX and LJ were in charge of the study concepts and design. HJ, HH, LY and JC performed data acquisition, analysis or interpretation. WX, HJ and LJ drafted the manuscript and made the figures. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: HH, LY and JC revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by institutional review board of Chengdu Fifth People’s Hospital and carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
No conflict of interests was declared in the study.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
No potential conflict of interests was declared in the study.
Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained all patients.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Huang, J., Huang, H. et al. Safety and efficacy of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Invest New Drugs 41, 579–586 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-023-01379-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-023-01379-y