Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neoadjuvant immunoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study

  • Research
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Although anti-programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) agents have been evaluated in the neoadjuvant setting for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer, including oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), the overall response rate is modest. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant nivolumab in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of locally advanced OCSCC.

Methods

OCSCC patients who underwent surgical resection within 6 months of treatment with nivolumab plus SBRT from December 2018 to February 2021 were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

All 30 eligible patients enrolled in this study well tolerated the neoadjuvant treatment with no serious adverse events (AEs). Of them, 27 patients (90.0%) achieved R0 resection, and 5 patients (16.7%) experienced procedure-associated complications. The complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) were 10.0%, 46.7% and 43.3% respectively. The major pathological response (MPR), complete pathological response (pCR) and clinical to pathological downstaging rate were 60.0%, 33.3% and 83.3% respectively. During the median follow-up period of 13.5 months, 26 patients (86.7%) who underwent surgical resection remained alive. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 24 months were 70.4% and 76.4% respectively.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus SBRT is safe and efficacious, and could be used as a potential neoadjuvant option for the treatment of patients with locally advanced OCSCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are available upon reasonable request from correspondence author.

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424

  2. Bernier J, Domenge C, Ozsahin M, Matuszewska K, Lefèbvre JL, Greiner RH et al (2004) Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 350(19):1945–1952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper JS, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA, Jacobs J, Campbell BH, Saxman SB et al (2004) Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 350(19):1937–1944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pignon JP, le Maître A, Maillard E, Bourhis J (2009) Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 92(1):4–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koo BS, Lim YC, Lee JS, Choi EC (2006) Recurrence and salvage treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Oral Oncol 42(8):789–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kademani D, Bell RB, Bagheri S, Holmgren E, Dierks E, Potter B et al (2005) Prognostic factors in intraoral squamous cell carcinoma: the influence of histologic grade. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 63(11):1599–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Haddad R, O’Neill A, Rabinowits G, Tishler R, Khuri F, Adkins D et al (2013) Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (sequential chemoradiotherapy) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer (PARADIGM): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):257–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen EE, Karrison TG, Kocherginsky M, Mueller J, Egan R, Huang CH et al (2014) Phase III randomized trial of induction chemotherapy in patients with N2 or N3 locally advanced head and neck cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 32(25):2735–2743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma J, Liu Y, Huang XL, Zhang ZY, Myers JN, Neskey DM et al (2012) Induction chemotherapy decreases the rate of distant metastasis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma but does not improve survival or locoregional control: a meta-analysis. Oral Oncol 48(11):1076–1084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas AD, Licitra L et al (2016) Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. N Engl J Med 375(19):1856–1867

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, Soulières D, Tahara M, de Castro G, Jr, et al (2019) Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet (London, England) 394(10212):1915–1928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferris RL, Spanos WC, Leidner R, Gonçalves A, Martens UM, Kyi C et al (2021) Neoadjuvant nivolumab for patients with resectable HPV-positive and HPV-negative squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck in the CheckMate 358 trial. J Immunother Cancer 9(6)

  13. Uppaluri R, Campbell KM, Egloff AM, Zolkind P, Skidmore ZL, Nussenbaum B et al (2020) Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Resectable Locally Advanced, Human Papillomavirus-Unrelated Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter, Phase II Trial. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 26(19):5140–5152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schoenfeld JD, Hanna GJ, Jo VY, Rawal B, Chen YH, Catalano PS et al (2020) Neoadjuvant Nivolumab or Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Untreated Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Open-Label Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 6(10):1563–1570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrarotto R, Bell D, Rubin ML, Hutcheson KA, Johnson JM, Goepfert RP et al (2020) Impact of Neoadjuvant Durvalumab with or without Tremelimumab on CD8(+) Tumor Lymphocyte Density, Safety, and Efficacy in Patients with Oropharynx Cancer: CIAO Trial Results. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 26(13):3211–3219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Klug F, Prakash H, Huber PE, Seibel T, Bender N, Halama N et al (2013) Low-dose irradiation programs macrophage differentiation to an iNOS+/M1 phenotype that orchestrates effective T cell immunotherapy. Cancer Cell 24(5):589–602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reits EA, Hodge JW, Herberts CA, Groothuis TA, Chakraborty M, Wansley EK et al (2006) Radiation modulates the peptide repertoire, enhances MHC class I expression, and induces successful antitumor immunotherapy. J Exp Med 203(5):1259–1271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiss J, Sheth S, Deal AM, Grilley Olson JE, Patel S, Hackman TG et al (2020) Concurrent Definitive Immunoradiotherapy for Patients with Stage III-IV Head and Neck Cancer and Cisplatin Contraindication. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 26(16):4260–4267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McBride S, Sherman E, Tsai CJ, Baxi S, Aghalar J, Eng J et al (2021) Randomized Phase II Trial of Nivolumab With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Nivolumab Alone in Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 39(1):30–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Leidner R, Crittenden M, Young K, Xiao H, Wu Y, Couey MA et al (2021) Neoadjuvant immunoradiotherapy results in high rate of complete pathological response and clinical to pathological downstaging in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer 9(5)

  21. Knochelmann HM, Horton JD, Liu S, Armeson K, Kaczmar JM, Wyatt MM et al (2021) Neoadjuvant presurgical PD-1 inhibition in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Cell reports Medicine 2(10):100426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA et al (2012) Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 30(15):1796–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weissferdt A, Pataer A, Vaporciyan AA, Correa AM, Sepesi B, Moran CA et al (2020) Agreement on Major Pathological Response in NSCLC Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Clin Lung Cancer 21(4):341–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Shibata H, Saito S, Uppaluri R (2021) Immunotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Paradigm Shift From Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy. Front Oncol 11:727433

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Matlung SE, Wilhelmina van Kempen PM, Bovenschen N, van Baarle D, Willems SM (2016) Differences in T-cell infiltrates and survival between HPV+ and HPV- oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Future Science OA 2(1):Fso88

  26. Wang J, Sun H, Zeng Q, Guo XJ, Wang H, Liu HH et al (2019) HPV-positive status associated with inflamed immune microenvironment and improved response to anti-PD-1 therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 9(1):13404

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu Y, Zhu G, Maroun CA, Wu IXY, Huang D, Seiwert TY et al (2021) Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1-Axis Blockade in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Stratified by Human Papillomavirus Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Immunol 12:645170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Oliva M, Spreafico A, Taberna M, Alemany L, Coburn B, Mesia R et al (2019) Immune biomarkers of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology 30(1):57–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McLaughlin J, Han G, Schalper KA, Carvajal-Hausdorf D, Pelekanou V, Rehman J et al (2016) Quantitative Assessment of the Heterogeneity of PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2(1):46–54

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Cohen EEW, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, Dinis J, Licitra L, Ahn MJ et al (2019) Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet (London, England) 393(10167):156–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the conception of the study. SP and WS contributed to patient recruitment, data collection and clinical investigation. QB and JN contributed to data analysis and interpretation. All authors drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Shen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the institutional review board of the 1st Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital and carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No conflict of interests was declared in the study.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interests was declared in the study.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, P., Qiao, B., Jin, N. et al. Neoadjuvant immunoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study. Invest New Drugs 40, 1282–1289 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-022-01293-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-022-01293-9

Keywords

Navigation