Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantification of the pharmacokinetic-toxicodynamic relationship of oral docetaxel co-administered with ritonavir

  • PHASE I STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Introduction Oral formulations of docetaxel have successfully been developed as an alternative for intravenous administration. Co-administration with the enzyme inhibitor ritonavir boosts the docetaxel plasma exposure. In dose-escalation trials, the maximum tolerated doses for two different dosing regimens were established and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were recorded. The aim of current analysis was to develop a pharmacokinetic (PK)-toxicodynamic (TOX) model to quantify the relationship between docetaxel plasma exposure and DLTs. Methods A total of 85 patients was included in the current analysis, 18 patients showed a DLT in the four-week observation period. A PK-TOX model was developed and simulations based on the PK-TOX model were performed. Results The final PK-TOX model was characterized by an effect compartment representing the toxic effect of docetaxel, which was linked to the probability of developing a DLT. Simulations of once-weekly, once-daily 60 mg and once-weekly, twice-daily 30 mg followed by 20 mg of oral docetaxel suggested that 14% and 34% of patients, respectively, would have a probability >25% to develop a DLT in a four-week period. Conclusions A PK-TOX model was successfully developed. This model can be used to evaluate the probability of developing a DLT following treatment with oral docetaxel and ritonavir in different dosing regimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jibodh RA, Lagas JS, Nuijen B, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH (2013) Taxanes: old drugs, new oral formulations. Eur J Pharmacol 717:40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.02.058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moes JJ, Stuurman FE, Hendrikx JJMA, Marchetti S, Huitema AD, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH, Nuijen B (2013) Pharmacokinetic evaluation of three oral formulations of docetaxel boosted with ritonavir: two single-drug formulations vs. a fixed-dose combination tablet. Drug Deliv Transl Res 3:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-012-0127-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moes JJ, Koolen SLW, Huitema ADR, Schellens JH, Beijnen JH, Nuijen B (2011) Pharmaceutical development and preliminary clinical testing of an oral solid dispersion formulation of docetaxel (ModraDoc001). Int J Pharm 420:244–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.08.041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sawicki E, Beijnen JH, Schellens JHM, Nuijen B (2016) Pharmaceutical development of an oral tablet formulation containing a spray dried amorphous solid dispersion of docetaxel or paclitaxel. Int J Pharm 511:765–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2016.07.068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Koolen SLW, Beijnen JH, Schellens JHM (2010) Intravenous-to-oral switch in anticancer chemotherapy: a focus on docetaxel and paclitaxel. Clin Pharmacol Ther 87:126–129. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2009.233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schellens JH, Malingré MM, Kruijtzer CM, Bardelmeijer HA, van Tellingen O, Schinkel AH, Beijnen JH (2000) Modulation of oral bioavailability of anticancer drugs: from mouse to man. Eur J Pharm Sci 12:103–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. TAXOTERE 20 mg/0.5 ml concentrate and solvent for solution for infusion. Summary of product characteristics

  8. Oostendorp RL, Huitema A, Rosing H, Jansen RS, ter Heine R, Keessen M, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH (2009) Coadministration of ritonavir strongly enhances the apparent oral bioavailability of docetaxel in patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 15:4228–4233. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bardelmeijer HA, Ouwehand M, Buckle T, Huisman MT, Schellens JH, Beijnen JH, van Tellingen O (2002) Low systemic exposure of oral docetaxel in mice resulting from extensive first-pass metabolism is boosted by ritonavir. Cancer Res 62:6158–6164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Weger VA, Stuurman FE, Hendrikx JJMA, Moes JJ, Sawicki E, Huitema ADR, Nuijen B, Thijssen B, Rosing H, Keessen M, Mergui-Roelvink M, Beijnen JH, Schellens JHM, Marchetti S (2017) A dose-escalation study of bi-daily once weekly oral docetaxel either as ModraDoc001 or ModraDoc006 combined with ritonavir. Eur J Cancer 86:217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Weger VA, Stuurman FE, Koolen SL, et al (2019) A phase I dose escalation study of once weekly oral administration of docetaxel as ModraDoc001 capsule or ModraDoc006 tablet in combination with ritonavir. Clin Cancer Res Epub ahead:Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-229912.

  12. Ho M, Mackey J (2014) Presentation and management of docetaxel-related adverse effects in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Manag Res 6:253. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S40601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. de Vries Schultink AHM, Suleiman AA, Schellens JHM, Beijnen JH, Huitema AD (2016) Pharmacodynamic modeling of adverse effects of anti-cancer drug treatment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 72:645–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-016-2030-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. van Hasselt JGC, Gupta A, Hussein Z, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH, Huitema AD (2013) Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis for eribulin mesilate-associated neutropenia. Br J Clin Pharmacol 76:412–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zandvliet AS, Schellens JHM, Beijnen JH, Huitema ADR (2008) Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment optimization in clinical oncology. Clin Pharmacokinet 47:487–513. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200847080-00001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang L, Beal SL, Sheiner LB (2003) Simultaneous vs. sequential analysis for population PK/PD data I: best-case performance. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 30:387–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu H, Janssen JM, Sawicki E, et al (2019) A population pharmacokinetic model of Oral Docetaxel Coadministered with ritonavir to support early clinical Development. J Clin Pharmacol jcph.1532. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1532

  18. van Brummelen EMJ, Huitema ADR, van Werkhoven E et al (2016) The performance of model-based versus rule-based phase I clinical trials in oncology: a quantitative comparison of the performance of model-based versus rule-based phase I trials with molecularly targeted anticancer drugs over the last 2 years. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 43:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-016-9466-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Keizer RJ, van Benten M, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH, Huitema AD (2011) Pirana and PCluster: a modeling environment and cluster infrastructure for NONMEM. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 101:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.04.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beal SL, Boeckman AJ, Sheiner LB (1988) NONMEM user guides

  21. Development Core Team R (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

Download references

Funding

The work was not supported by any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie M. Janssen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

BN, JB and JS are inventors and hold a patent on oral ModraDoc formulations. JB and JS are part-time employees and shareholders in Modra Pharmaceuticals, a spinout company developing oral taxane formulations. HY, JJ, VW, RS, SM, TD and AH declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the clinical studies.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, H., Janssen, J.M., de Weger, V.A. et al. Quantification of the pharmacokinetic-toxicodynamic relationship of oral docetaxel co-administered with ritonavir. Invest New Drugs 38, 1526–1532 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-020-00935-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-020-00935-0

Keywords

Navigation