Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of Polymerase Chain Reaction in Stool and Duodenal Biopsy for Diagnosis of Giardiasis in Patients with Persistent/Chronic Diarrhea

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Giardia duodenalis is a common cause of chronic diarrhea especially in tropical countries. Diagnosis is based on microscopy (three stool samples) for trophozoites/cysts. Role of stool or duodenal biopsy PCR as a diagnostic method needs to be defined. We conducted a prospective study to determine the diagnostic characteristics of G. duodenalis stool and duodenal biopsy PCR in comparison to stool microscopy (reference standard). Later, we compared other techniques with stool PCR, considering it as new reference standard and characterized the type of Giardia assemblage.

Methods

G. duodenalis stool nested PCR was first evaluated using 40 positive controls and 50 negative controls considering stool microscopy as reference standard. Patients with chronic diarrhea (n = 100) were evaluated by stool microscopy and nested PCR. In 30 patients in whom upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed, duodenal biopsy samples were obtained and evaluated by histopathology, imprint cytology, and nested PCR. The type of Giardia assemblage was detected by assemblage-specific PCR.

Results

Stool nested PCR was found to have sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 94%, respectively, compared to stool microscopy. In patients with chronic diarrhea, 48% had evidence of Giardia infection. Stool microscopy detected 65%, stool PCR detected an additional 27%, and duodenal biopsy PCR detected an additional 8% of cases. The commonest assemblage found was assemblage B. Clinical and demographic characteristics were similar in patients harboring either assemblage A or B.

Conclusion

Stool PCR is more sensitive than stool microscopy. By utilizing stool microscopy, stool nested PCR, and duodenal biopsy PCR in sequential manner, diagnostic yield can be increased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Halliez MC, Buret AG. Extra-intestinal and long term consequences of Giardia duodenalis infections. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:8974–8985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Savioli L, Smith H, Thompson A. Giardia and Cryptosporidium join the ‘neglected diseases initiative’. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22:203–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Laishram S, Kang G, Ajjampur SS. Giardiasis: a review on assemblage distribution and epidemiology in India. Indian J Gastroentrol. 2012;3:3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roxstrom-Lindquist K, Palm D, Reiner D, Ringqvist E, Svard SG. Giardia immunity: an update. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22:26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Behera B, Mirdha BR, Makharia GK, Bhatnagar S, Gupta SD, Samantaray JC. Parasites in patients with malabsorption syndrome: a clinical study in children and adults. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:672–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-007-9927-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ankarklev J, Jerlström-Hultqvist J, Ringqvist E, Troell K, Svärd SG. Behind the smile: cell biology and disease mechanisms of Giardia species. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:413–422.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wolfe MS. Giardiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1992;5:93–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Broglia A, Weitzel T, Harms G, Caccio SM, Nockler K. Molecular typing of Giardia duodenalis isolates from German travellers. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:3449–3456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Soliman RH, Fuentes I, Rubio JM. Identification of a novel assemblage B subgenotype and a zoonotic assemblage C in human isolated of Giardia intestinalis in Egypt. Parasitol Int. 2011;60:507–511.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Feng Y, Xiao L. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and giardiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24:110–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vanni I, Caccio MS, Lith LV, et al. Detection of Giardia duodenalis assemblages A and B in human faeces by simple, assemblage-specific PCR assays. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1776.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Duffy DL, Montenegro-Bethancourt G, Solomons NW, Belosevic M, Clandinin MT. Prevalence of giardiasis in children attending semi-urban daycare centres in Guatemala and comparison of 3 Giardia detection tests. J Health Popul Nutr. 2013;3:290–293.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jahan N, Khatoon R, Ahmad S. A comparison of microscopy and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of G. lamblia in human faecal specimens. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:DC04–DC06.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Singhal S, Mittal V, Khare V, Singh YI. Comparative analysis of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and direct microscopy for the diagnosis of Giardia intestinalis in faecal samples. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2015;58:69–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barazesh A, Majidi J, Fallah E, Jamali R, Abdolalizade R, Gholikhani R. Designing of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit for diagnosis copro-antigens of Giardia lamblia. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9:5025–5027.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Soares R, Tasca T. Giardiasis: an update review on sensitivity and specificity of methods for laboratorial diagnosis. J Microbiol Methods. 2016;129:98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lebwohl B, Deckelbaum RJ, Green PHR. Giardiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:906–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hanson KL, Cartwright CP. Use of an enzyme immunoassay does not eliminate the need to analyze multiple stool specimens for sensitive detection of Giardia lamblia. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:474–477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gotfred-Rasmussen HG, Lund M, Enemark HL, Erlandsen M, Petersen E. Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of 4 methods for detection of Giardia duodenalis in feces: immunofluorescence and PCR are superior to microscopy of concentrated iodine-stained samples. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;84:187–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fouad HA, Esmat S, Basyoni MMA, Farhan MS, Kobaisi MH. Molecular identification of Giardia intestinalis in patients with dyspepsia. Digestion. 2014;90:63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Meningher T, Boleslavsky D, Barshack I, Tabibian-Keissar H, Kohen Gur-Wahnon D, et al. Giardia lamblia miRNAs as a new diagnostic tool for human giardiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Centers for disease control and prevention. Water, Sanitation and environmentally related hygiene; 2016. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/hygiene/index.html. Accessed June 26, 2019.

  23. Sulaiman IM, Fayer R, Bern C, et al. Triosephosphate isomerase gene characterization and potential zoonotic transmission of Giardia duodenalis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:1444–1452.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin A, Ercumen A, Benjamin-Chung J, et al. Effects of water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on child enteric protozoan infections in rural Bangladesh: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:1515–1522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Speich B, Croll D, Fürst T, Utzinger J, Keiser J. Effect of sanitation and water treatment on intestinal protozoa infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Inf Dis. 2015;16:87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sullivan PB, Marsh MN, Phillips MB, et al. Prevention and treatment of giardiasis in chronic diarrhoea and malnutrition. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:304–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Oberhuber G, Stolte M. Giardiasis: analysis of histological changes in biopsy specimens of 80 patients. J Clin Pathol. 1990;43:641–643.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Panarelli NC, Gobara N, Hoda RS, Chaump M, Jessurun J, Yantiss RK. Cytology preparations of formalin fixative aid detection of Giardia in duodenal biopsy samples. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:570–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MJ performed the experiments. UD diagnosed the adult patients and evaluated the manuscript. JS diagnosed the adult patients and critically revised the manuscript. BRT diagnosed the pediatric patients. RN performed histopathology examination. NG performed cytological examination. VS critically revised the manuscript. SK conceived the work, supervised the work, and evaluated the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumeeta Khurana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jangra, M., Dutta, U., Shah, J. et al. Role of Polymerase Chain Reaction in Stool and Duodenal Biopsy for Diagnosis of Giardiasis in Patients with Persistent/Chronic Diarrhea. Dig Dis Sci 65, 2345–2353 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-06042-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-06042-2

Keywords

Navigation