Skip to main content
Log in

Role of Symptoms, Trend of Liver Tests, and Endotherapy in Management of Post-Cholecystectomy Biliary Leak

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Biliary leaks are widely reported complications of cholecystectomy, but standard management remains undecided. The objective of our study was to report the role of symptoms, biochemical tests, and ERCP in patients with a leak.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-one patients (8 M, 26–77 years) with suspected post-cholecystectomy biliary leak were retrospectively studied. Symptoms and liver tests (LTs) after surgery were monitored. Trends of LTs were considered positive if increases at >48 h were seen. ERCP was performed in all patients. Findings at endoscopy and treatments were reported. Outcome results were obtained for all patients.

Results

Seventeen of 21 patients had persistent biliary leak at ERCP, because of direct injury (n = 10), accessory duct (n = 4), or cystic duct stump (n = 3). Eleven of 17 patients (six without symptoms), had distal obstruction because of surgical injury (n = 8), stone (n = 2), or cholangiocarcinoma (n = 1) and underwent stenting (n = 4), naso-biliary drainage, NBD (n = 3), or surgery (n = 4). Among the six patients without obstruction (four without symptoms), stenting was performed in two and NBD in four. The four patients without apparent leak underwent NBD. Impairment of LTs was present in ten out of eleven (91%) patients with obstruction versus six of ten (60%) without obstruction. No complications occurred after ERCP. During a median follow-up of 33 months (cholangiocarcinoma excluded) all but one remained asymptomatic.

Conclusions

Symptoms and trend of LTs were not predictive of biliary obstruction in patients with a leak after cholecystectomy. Both endotherapy and surgery had favorable outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ERCP:

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

LTs:

Liver tests

NBD:

Naso-biliary drainage

References

  1. Barkun AN, Rezieg M, Mehta S, et al. Postcholecystectomy biliary leaks in the laparoscopic era: risk factors, presentation, and management. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;45(3):277–282.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kozarek R, Gannan R, Baerg R, Wagonfeld J, Ball T. Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1040–1043.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyers WC, Branum GD, Farouk M, et al. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(16):1073–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Strasberg SM. Error traps and vasculo-biliary injury in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:284–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baillie J, Paulson EK, Vitellas KM. Biliary imaging. A review. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:1686–1699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barton JR, Russell RCG, Hatfield ARW. Management of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1995;82:980–984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Binmoeller KF, Katon RM, Shneidman R. Endoscopic management of postoperative biliary leaks: review of 77 cases and report of two cases with biloma formation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86(2):227–231.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davids PH, Rauws EAJ, Tytgat GNJ, Huibregtse K. Postoperative bile leakage: endoscopic management. Gut. 1991;33:1118–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Palma GD, Galloro G, Iuliano G, et al. Leaks from laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49(46):924–925.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaffes AJ, Hourigan L, De Luca N, Byth K, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ. Impact of endoscopic intervention in 100 patients with suspected postcholecystectomy bile leak. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61(2):269–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mergener K, Strobel JC, Suhocki P, et al. The role of ERCP in diagnosis and management of accessory bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50(4):527–531.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryan ME, Geenen JE, Lehman GA, Aliperti G, Freeman ML, Silverman WB. Endoscopic intervention for biliary leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter review. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47(3):261–266.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shanda GS, Bourke MJ, Haber GB, Kortan PP. Endoscopic therapy for bile leak based on a new classification: results in 207 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60(4):567–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bergman JJGHM, Van den Brink GR, Rauws EAJ, et al. Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gut. 1996;38:141–147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Freeman ML. Adverse outcome of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:S273–S282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fouch PG, Harlan JR, Hoefer M. Endoscopic therapy for patients with a post-operative biliary leak. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:416–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brugge WR, Rosenberg DJ, Alavi A. Diagnosis of postoperative bile leaks. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:2178–2183.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker AT, Shapiro AW, Brooks DC, Braver JM, Tumeh SS. Bile duct disruption and biloma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: imaging evaluation. A J R. 1992;158:785–789.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kalayci C, Aisen A, Canal D, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography documents bile leak site after cholecystectomy in patients with aberrant right hepatic duct where ERCP fails. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:277–281.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Familiari L, Familiari P, Scaffidi M. False negative ERCP in biliary leak. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55(6):771–772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moloney MM, Owen WJ, Wilkinson ML. Failure of ERCP ti identify biliary leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:262–263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bjorkman DJ, Carr-Locke DL, Lichtenstein DR, et al. Postsurgical bile leaks: endoscopic obliteration of the transpapillary pressure gradient is enough. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90(12):2128–2132.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Marks JM, Ponsky JL, Shillingstad RB, Singh J. Biliary stenting is more effective than sphincterotomy in the resolution of biliary leaks. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:327–330.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Youngelman DF, Marks JM, Ponsky T, Ponsky JL. Comparison of bile duct pressures following sphincterotomy and endobiliary stenting in a canine model. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(2):126–128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brooks DC, Becker JM, Connors PJ, Carr-Locke DL. Management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1993;7:292–295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Prat F, Pelletier G, Ponchon T, et al. What role can endoscopy play in the management of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Endoscopy. 1997;29:341–348.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Coelho-Prabhu N, Baron TH. Assessment of need for repeat ERCP during biliary stent removal after clinical resolution of postcholecystectomy bile leak. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:100–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Cantù.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cantù, P., Tenca, A., Caparello, C. et al. Role of Symptoms, Trend of Liver Tests, and Endotherapy in Management of Post-Cholecystectomy Biliary Leak. Dig Dis Sci 56, 1565–1571 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1448-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1448-2

Keywords

Navigation