Abstract
A new range of visual and sensory strategies is emerging as an alternative mode of knowledge in criminology. Drawing on data from a pilot study, which started in 2017 at San Vittore Prison (in Milan, Italy), we discuss the potential, utility and the limitations of a visual and mobile participatory methodology for investigating what is perceived and expected with regard to the presence of prison in today’s urban environment. We do this, first, by considering in detail two techniques for collecting qualitative data: qualitative interviews with mental images (a form of graphic elicitation) and itinerant soliloquies—a mobile methodology. With respect to the latter, we suggest that the use of drawing as a non-representational visual tool, in connection with multisensory aspects of walking, can facilitate the emergence of often-ignored perspectives, perceptions and narratives about prison. Finally, we suggest how such a project could be useful for the emerging connections between visual, aesthetic and narrative criminologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
La Nave is a program in San Vittore Prison for substance-dependent prisoners—specifically, those individuals who are considered sufficiently motivated to address their addictions and desist from crime. The aim is to encourage the participants in La Nave to understand the psycho-social processes that led to addiction and deviance.
Earle (2017: 125) writes: “Prisons, with their potential for solitary confinement ever-present, confront the prisoner with the classic polarities of existential ambivalence: hell is other people and hell is no people at all.”
As Ben-Moshe (2018: 348) adds, “Reclaiming abolition as dis-epistemology and its lack of certainty would solidify abolition as fashioning new ways of envisioning the world and opening up opportunities that are not closed off by readymade prescriptions.”
References
Anastasia, S., Corleone, F., & Zevi, L. (Eds.). (2011). Il corpo e lo spazio della pena. Architettura, urbanistica e politiche penitenziarie. Roma: Ediesse.
Athens, L. (2007). Radical interactionism. Going beyond mead. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37(2), 137–165.
Back, L. (2007). The art of listening. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
Back, L. (2017). Marchers and steppers; memory, city life and walking. In C. Bates & A. Rhys-Taylor (Eds.), Walking through social research (pp. 21–37). Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Back, L., & Puwar, N. (Eds.). (2012). Live methods. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. London: Sage.
Ben-Moshe, L. (2018). Dis-epistemologies of abolition. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 26(3), 341–355.
Berger, J (2008 [1972]). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bonifacio, V., & Schillaci, R. (2017). Between Inside and outside: Projects of visual research inside italian prisons. Visual Anthropology, 30(3), 235–248.
Brisman, A., & South, N. (2014). Green cultural criminology. Constructions of environmental harm, consumerism and resistance to ecocide. London: Routledge.
Brown, M. (2014). Visual criminology and carceral studies: Counter-images in the carceral age. Theoretical Criminology, 18(2), 176–197.
Brown, M. (2017). Visual criminology. Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology. Retrieved April 8, 2020, from https://criminology.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264079-e-206?product=orecri#acrefore-9780190264079-e-206.
Brown, M., & Carrabine, E. (Eds.). (2017). Routledge international handbook of visual criminology. Abingdon, Oxon, UK, and New York: Routledge.
Bull, M., & Back, L. (2003). Introduction: Into sound. In M. Bull & L. Back (Eds.), The auditory culture reader (pp. 1–25). Oxford: Berg.
Carrabine, E. (2017). Social science and visual culture. In M. Brown & E. Carrabine (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of visual criminology (pp. 23–39). Abingdon, Oxon, UK, and New York: Routledge.
Coyle, M. J. (2018). Transgression and standard theories: Contributions toward penal abolition. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 26(3), 325–339.
Degen, M. M., & Rose, G. (2012). The sensory experiencing of urban design: The role of walking and perceptual memory. Urban Studies, 49(15), 3271–3287.
Dissanayake, E. (2004). What is art for?. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
Earle, R. (2017). Convict criminology: Inside and out. Bristol, UK. Policy Press.
Evans, J., & Jones, P. (2011). The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place. Applied Geography, 31(2), 849–858.
Foot, J. (1998). The tale of San Vittore: Prisons, politics, crime and fascism in Milan, 1943–1946. Modern Italy, 3(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13532949808454790.
Fredriksson, T. (2018). Abject (m)othering: A narratological study of the prison as an abject and uncanny institution. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 27(2), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-018-9412-0.
Harper, D. (2001). Changing works: Visions of a lost agriculture. Chicago, IL, and London: University of Chicago Press.
Heath, S., Chapman, L., & Sketcher, T. M. C. (2018). Observational sketching as method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(6), 713–728.
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
Irving, A. (2011). Strange distance: Towards an anthropology of interior dialogue. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 25(1), 22–44.
Jacobsen, M. H. (Ed.). (2014). The poetics of crime: Understanding and researching crime and deviance through creative sources. London: Routledge.
Jewkes, Y., Slee, E., & Moran, D. (2017). The visual retreat of the prison: Non-places for non-people. In M. Brown & E. Carrabine (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Visual Criminology (pp. 293–304). Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Jones, P., Bunce, G., Evans, J., Gibbs, H., & Ricketts Hein, J. (2008). Exploring space and place with walking interviews. Journal of Research Practice, 4(2), 1–9.
Literat, I. (2013). A pencil for your thoughts: Participatory drawing as a visual research method with children and youth. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 84–98.
Martinotti, G. (1993). Metropoli. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Mead, G. H. (1963 [1934]). Mind, self and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Millie, A. (2017a). Urban interventionism as a challenge to aesthetic order: Towards an aesthetic criminology. Crime Media Culture, 13(1), 3–20.
Millie, A. (2017b). Philosophical criminology. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Moran, D. (2017). Carceral geography and the spatialization of carceral studies. In M. Brown & E. Carrabine (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Visual Criminology (pp. 89–100). Abingdon, Oxon, UK, and New York: Routledge.
Moran, D., & Turner, J. (2018). Turning over a new leaf: The health-enabling capacities of nature contact in prison. Social Science & Medicine, 231, 62–69.
Mopas, M., & Moore, D. (2012). Talking heads and bleeding hearts: Newsmaking, emotion and public criminology in the wake of a sexual assault. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 20(2), 183–196.
Natali, L. (2013). The big grey elephants in the backyard of Huelva, Spain. In R. White (Ed.), Global environmental Harm. Criminological perspectives (pp. 193–209). London: Willan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843927983.
Natali, L. (2016). A visual approach for green criminology. Exploring the social perception of environmental harm. London: Palgrave.
Natali, L. (2019). Visually exploring social perceptions of environmental harm in global urban contexts. Current Sociology, 67(5), 650–668.
Natali, L., & de Nardin Budó, M. (2019). A sensory and visual approach for comprehending environmental victimization by the asbestos industry in Casale Monferrato. European Journal of Criminology, 16(6), 708–727.
Natali, L., & McClanahan, B. (2017). Perceiving and communicating environmental contamination and change: Towards a green cultural criminology with images. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 25(2), 199–214.
O’Neill, M. (2017). Asylum seekers and moving images: Walking, sensorial encounters and visual criminology. In M. Brown & E. Carrabine (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of visual criminology (pp. 389–403). Abingdon, Oxon, UK, and New York: Routledge.
O’Neill, M. (2018). Walking, well-being and community: Racialized mothers building cultural citizenship using participatory arts and participatory action research. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41(1), 73–97.
O’Neill, M., & Stenning, P. (2014). Walking biographies and innovations in visual and participatory methods: Community, politics and resistance in Downtown East Side Vancouver. In C. Heinz & G. Hornung (Eds.), The medialization of auto/biographies: Different forms and their communicative contexts (pp. 215–246). Hamburg, DEU: UVK.
Pauwels, L. (2017). Key methods of visual criminology. An overview of different approaches and their affordances. In M. Brown & E. Carrabine (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of visual criminology (pp. 62–73). Abingdon, Oxon, UK, and New York: Routledge.
Pelot-Hobbs, L. (2018). Scaling up or scaling back? The pitfalls and possibilities of leveraging federal interventions for abolition. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 26(3), 423–441.
Peyrefitte, M. (2012). Ways of seeing, ways of being and ways of knowing in the inner-city: Exploring sense of place through visual tours. Sociological Research Online, 17(4), 125–141.
Pink, S. (2008). An urban tour. The sensory sociality of ethnographic place-making. Ethnography, 9(2), 175–196.
Prendergast, M. (2003). I, me, mine: Soliloquizing as reflective practice. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 4(1), 1–8.
Rafter, N. (2014). Introduction to special issue on visual culture and the Iconography of crime and punishment. Theoretical Criminology, 18(2), 127–133.
Theron, L., Mitchell, C., Smith, A., & Stuart, J. (Eds.). (2011). Picturing research: Drawings as visual methodology. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Todd, Z., & Harrison, S. J. (2008). Metaphor analysis. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 479–494). New York and London: The Guilford Press.
Varga-Atkins, T., & O'Brien, M. (2008). From drawings to diagrams: Maintaining researcher control during graphic elicitation in qualitative interview. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270902759998.
Vygotskij, L. S. (1972). Immaginazione e creatività nell'età infantile. Roma: Editori Riuniti.
Wall, K., & Higgins, S. (2006). Facilitating metacognitive talk: A research and learning tool. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29(1), 39–53.
Young, J. (2011). The criminological imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Yuen, F. (2011). Embracing emotionality: Clothing my “Naked Truths’”. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 19(1), 75–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Natali, L., Acito, G., Mutti, C. et al. A Visual and Sensory Participatory Methodology to Explore Social Perceptions: A Case Study of the San Vittore Prison in Milan, Italy. Crit Crim 29, 783–800 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-020-09508-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-020-09508-2