Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Socio-economic and cultural sources of conflict between forest villagers and forest; a case study from Black Sea Region, Turkey

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human relations with the forest ecosystem vary greatly according to biophysical, demographic and economic conditions. Understanding the mutual relationships among these conditions can enable a better understanding of their drivers. Therefore, in this study, a forest management unit and the rural population within this unit were examined and the existence of the conflict phenomenon, the mutual relations between the elements possibly causing the conflict, and the dimensions of these relations were investigated. The study found that only 12% of the forest villagers were educated at a middle-school level or higher and only 17% of this section of low-income people worked in forestry activities for additional income. It was determined that the crime awareness level of the villagers engaged in forestry activities was higher than in those who did not work in this sector (X2 = 30.78; p < 0.05). Moreover, the number of people who were penalized for forest crimes increased in parallel with the need for firewood / wood in their households (X2 = 9.96; p < 0.05). It was found that by raising the forest villagers’ awareness concerning their legal rights, their crime awareness level also increased. (X2 = 157.46; p < 0.05). As a result, the study revealed that the income and education levels of the forest villagers had a direct effect on forest crime as the main indicator of the conflict between forest villagers and forest management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hellström, E. (2001). Conflict cultures: Qualitative comparative analysis of environmental conflicts in forestry. Silva Fennica Monographs 2.

  2. Yasmi, Y., Schanz, H., & Salim, A. (2006). Manifestation of conflict escalation in natural resource management. Environmental Science & Policy, 9(6), 538–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher, L. A., Kim, Y. S., Latifah, S., & Mukarom, M. (2017). Managing Forest conflicts: Perspectives of Indonesia's forest management unit directors. Forest and Society, 1, 8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wyman, M. S., & Stein, T. V. (2010). Modeling social and land-use/land-cover change data to assess drivers of smallholder deforestation in Belize. Applied Geography, 30, 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Balmford, A., Bruner, A., Cooper, P., Costanza, R., Farber, S., Green,R.E.., Jenkins, M., Jefferiss, P., Jessamy, V., Madden, J.., Munro, K., Myers, N., Naeem, S., Paavola, J., Rayment, M., Rosendo, S., Roughgarden, J.., Trumper, K., Turner, R.K. (2002). Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science, 297 (5583): 950–953. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073947.

  6. Gençay, G., & Mercimek, A. (2019). Public consciousness and influence of law on forest crimes: Insights from Kastamonu, Turkey. Forest Policy and Economics, 106, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yasmi, Y., Kelley, L., Murdiyarso, D., & Patel, T. (2012). The struggle over Asia's forests: An overview of forest conflict and potential implications for REDD+. International Forestry Review, 14(1), 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhiaulhaq, A., De Bruyn, T., & Gritten, D. (2015). The use and effectiveness of mediation in forest and land conflict transformation in Southeast Asia: Case studies from Cambodia, Indonesia and Thailand. Environmental Science & Policy, 45, 132–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yasmi, Y., Guernier, J., & Colfer, C. J. P. (2009). Positive and negative aspects of forestry conflict: Lessons from a decentralized forest management in Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 11(1), 98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bergseng, E., & Vatn, A. (2009). Why protection of biodiversity creates conflict – Some evidence from the Nordic countries. Journal of Forest Economics, 15, 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2008.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Castro, A. P., & Nielsen, E. (2001). Indigenous people and co-management: Implications for conflict management. Environmental Science & Policy, 4(4–5), 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lane, M. B. (1999). Regional forest agreements: Resolving resource conflicts or managing resource politics? Australian Geographical Studies, 37(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8470.00075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Geist, H. J., & Lambin, E. F. (2001). What drives tropical deforestation? LUCC Report Series, 4, 116.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Duruöz, E., Anıl, Y., Çoban, C. (1976). Employment possibilities for forest villagers in the forestry sector and in Forest regional directorate cities. Forestry Research Institute Publications Technical Series Bulletin 79, Şark Press, Ankara.

  15. Erdönmez, C., Özden, S., Atmış, E., Akesen, A., Ekizoğlu, A., Kuvan, Y. (2010). Forestry policy. Foresters Association of Turkey Publication, Ankara, 254 pages. ISBN 978–9944–0048-3-1.

  16. Boori, M. S., Voženílek, V., & Choudhary, K. (2015). Land use/cover disturbance due to tourism in Jeseníky Mountain, Czech Republic: A remote sensing and GIS based approach. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2014.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Buğday, S. E., & Özden, S. (2017). The relationship between terrain and rural migration (1965-2013) on the north of Turkey (the case of Kastamonu). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(4), 154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5867-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yılmaz, M. (2015). Türkiye'de kırsal nüfusun değişimi ve illere göre dağılımı (1980–2012). Eastern Geographical Review, 20(33), 161–188. https://doi.org/10.17295/dcd.71070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Özden, S., & Ayan, S. (2016). Forest crimes as a threat to sustainable forest management. Sibirskij Lesnoj Zurnal\Siberian Journal of Forest Science, 4, 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Başkent, E. Z., & Kadıoğulları, A. (2007). Spatial and temporal dynamics of land use pattern in Turkey: A case study in İnegöl. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81(4), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kadıoğulları, A. İ., Keleş, S., Başkent, E. Z., & Günlü, A. (2008). Spatiotemporal changes in landscape pattern in response to afforestation in northeastern Turkey: A case study of Torul. Scottish Geographical Journal, 124(4), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702540802566254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaptan, S. (2018). Sosyo-Ekonomik durum Envanteri ve Orman Amenajman Planlarına Yansıtılması [Socio-economic status inventory and reflections on Forest management plans]. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Forest Engineering, Bartın University Institute of Science and Technology, Bartın, Turkey, 250 pages.

  23. Ayanoğlu, S., Güneş, Y. (2003). Orman Suçları. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Yayınları, Rektörlük no: 4420, Fakülte no:471. pp.167.

  24. Bayındır, S. (2016) Orman Suçları. Legal Yayıncılık. 268 sayfa.

  25. Toprak, M. (2017) Açıklamalı-İçtihatlı Orman Suçları. Adalet Yayınevi. 317 sayfa.

  26. OGM, 2017. 2017 Yılı İdare Faaliyet Raporu, Strateji Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı.

  27. Elvan, O. D. (2010). Ormanlarda otlatma kabahatinin hukuki açıdan incelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 2, 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Alkan, S. (2007). Trabzon İli Orman Köylerinde Kadın ve Orman Kaynakları İlişkisi [The relationship between women and forest resources in forest villages of Trabzon Province]. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Forest Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Science and Technology, Trabzon, Turkey, 167 pages.

  29. Sapkota, I. P., & Oden, P. C. (2008). Household characteristics and dependency on community forests in Terai of Nepal. International Journal of Social Forestry, 1(2), 123–144 ISSN 1979-2611.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mukul, S. A., Herbohn, J., Rashid, A. Z. M. M., & Uddin, M. B. (2014). Comparing the effectiveness of forest law enforcement and economic incentives to prevent illegal logging in Bangladesh. International Forestry Review, 16(3), 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Alkan, S. (2014). The impacts of rural population Changeson forests and forestry (a case study in Trabzon). Kastamonu University Forestry Faculty Journal, 14(1), 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Haliza, A. R. (2010). Penglibatan masyarakat peribumi dalam isu berkaitan persekitaran: tinjauan terhadap suku Mah Meri di Pulau Carey, Kuala Langat Selangor. Humanity, 17, 111–134.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gümüş, C. (1992). Causes of forest crimes in Amasya Regional Directorate of Forestry. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Forest Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Science and Technology, Trabzon, Turkey, 231 p.

  34. Brunner, J., Seymour, F., Badenoch, N., Ratner, B. D. (1999). Forest problems and law enforcement in Southeast Asia: The role of local communities. World Resources Institute.

  35. Atmiş, E., Günşen, H. B., Lise, B. B., & Lise, W. (2009). Factors affecting forest cooperative's participation in forestry in Turkey. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(2), 102–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Meinich, S. (2011). The impact of increased awareness on forest governance. A case study of the Mama Misitu awareness raising campaign in forest adjacent villages in Southern Tanzania (Master's thesis).

  37. Zengin, H., Yeşil, A., Asan, Ü., Bettinger, P., Cieszewski, C., & Siry, J. P. (2013). Evolution of modern forest management planning in the republic of Turkey. Journal of Forestry, 111(4), 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Bartin University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit [BAP-2011-08].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Engineering, Bartin University, 74100, Bartin, Turkey

    Birsen Durkaya, Sinan Kaptan & Ali Durkaya

Authors
  1. Birsen Durkaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sinan Kaptan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali Durkaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birsen Durkaya.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Durkaya, B., Kaptan, S. & Durkaya, A. Socio-economic and cultural sources of conflict between forest villagers and forest; a case study from Black Sea Region, Turkey. Crime Law Soc Change 74, 155–173 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-020-09883-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-020-09883-5

Search

Navigation