Abstract
Political corruption is a complicated issue, with pundits, scholars, and armchair theorists speculating on what makes politics so seemingly corrupt. The US agency tasked with investigating and correcting this corruption is the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Public Integrity Section (PIN). However, to date, there is no analysis of how corruption is interpreted and framed by this important government agency. Using a constructionist framework, a content analysis of thirty-five years of annual PIN reports to Congress is undertaken, demonstrating: 1) the PIN never explicitly defines what corruption is; 2) the PIN pays particular attention to the most dramatic cases of corruption (as opposed to the more mundane, typical cases) and emphasizes private businesses and individual malfeasance as exemplars of corruption. Finally, 3) the PIN has recently stopped briefly detailing each case they worked on in a year, and instead only present major highlights. In conclusion, the PIN frames corruption in a way that limits the ability for meaningful social change to occur at an institutional level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. D. (2003). The political economy of institutions and corruption in American states. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 341–365.
Andvig, J., Fjeldstad, O.H., Amundsen, I., Seissener, T., & Soreide, T. (2000). "Research on corruption: A policy oriented survey." Norwegian Agency for Development Co-Operation.
Benford, R. D. (1997). An insider’s critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 67(4), 409–430.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Best, J. (1995). Constructionism in context. In J. Best (Ed.), Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems (pp. 337–354). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade's literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 246–263.
Boylan, R. T., & Long, C. X. (2003). Measuring public corruption in the American states: A survey of state house reporters. State politics & policy quarterly, 3(4), 420–438.
Brooks, R. C. (1909). The nature of political corruption. Political science quarterly, 24(1), 1–22.
Braithwaite, J. (1985). White collar crime. Annual Review of Sociology, 11(1), 1–25.
Coleman, J. W. (1987). Toward an integrated theory of white-collar crime. American Journal of Sociology, 93(2), 406–439.
Cordis, A. & Milyo, J. (2013). Do state campaign finance reforms reduce public corruption? George Mason University, Mercatus Center, Working Paper (13–09).
Cordis, A., & Milyo, J. (2016). Measuring public corruption in the United States: Evidence from administrative records of federal prosecutions. Public integrity, 18(2), 127–148.
De Graaf, G., & Huberts, L. W. (2008). Portraying the nature of corruption using an explorative case study design. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 640–653.
della Porta, D., & Vannuci, A. (2012). Political corruption. In E. Amenta, K. Nash & A. Scott (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to political sociology (pp. 130–145). Wiley-Blackwell.
della Porta, D., & Vannucci, A. (2009). Corrupt Exchanges: Actors, Resources, and Mechanisms of Political Corruption. Aldine De Gruyter.
Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066.
Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Flavin, P., & Ledet, R. (2013). Religion and government corruption in the American states. Public integrity, 15(4), 329–343.
Friedrichs, D. (2009). Trusted criminals: White collar crime in contemporary society. Cengage Learning.
Galloway, G. B. (1959). Development of the committee system in the house of representatives. The American Historical Review, 65(1), 17–30.
Gasper, D., Portocarrero, A. V., & Clair, A. L. S. (2013). The framing of climate change and development: A comparative analysis of the human development report 2007/8 and the world development report 2010. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 28–39.
Ginley, C. (2012). Grading the nation: How accountable is your state? http://www.publicintegrity.org/2012/03/19/8423/grading-nation-how-accountable-your-state.
Green, P, & Ward, T. (2004). State crime: Governments, violence and corruption. Pluto Press.
Gusfield, J. R. (1996). Contested meanings: The construction of alcohol problems. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Heywood, P. (1997). Political corruption: Problems and perspectives. Political studies, 45(3), 417–435.
Ibarra, P., & Kitsuse, J. (2003). Claims-making discourse and vernacular resources. In J. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Challenges and choices: Constructionist perspectives on social problems. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Johnston, M. (2002). Right and wrong in American politics: Popular conceptions of corruption. In A. J. Heidenheimer & M. Johnston (Eds.), Political corruption: Concepts and contexts (pp. 173–194). Transaction Publishers.
Lancaster, T. D., & Montinola, G. R. (1997). Toward a methodology for the comparative study of political corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change, 27(3–4), 185–206.
Lessoff, A., & Connolly, J. J. (2013). From political insult to political theory: The boss, the machine, and the pluralist city. The journal of policy history, 25(2), 139–172.
Loseke, D. R. (1999). Thinking about social problems: An introduction to constructionist perspectives. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Maxwell, A., & Winters, R. F. (2005). Political corruption in America. Dartmouth College, May: Manuscript.
Meier, K. J., & Holbrook, T. M. (1992). “I seen my opportunities and I took' em:” political corruption in the American states. The journal of politics, 54(1), 135–155.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. The Free Press.
Morris, S. D., & Klesner, J. L. (2010). Corruption and trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 43(10), 1258–1285.
Musgrove, G. D. (2012). Rumor, repression, and racial politics: How the harassment of black elected officials shaped post-civil rights America. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Nice, D. C. (1983). Political corruption in the American states. American politics quarterly, 11(4), 507–517.
PIN. (1978). Report to Congress on the Activities and Operations of the Public Integrity Section for 1978. Washington, D.C.: Department of Justice.
Pfohl, S. (1977). The 'discovery' of child abuse. Social Problems, 24(3), 310–323.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978). Corruption: A study in political economy. New York: Academic Press.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1996). The political economy of corruption: Causes and consequences. In K. A. Elliott (Ed.), Corruption and the global economy (pp. 31–60). Institute for International Economics.
Schlesinger, T., & Meier, K. J. (2002). Variations in corruption among the American states. In A. J. Heidenheimer & M. Johnston (Eds.), Political corruption: Concepts and contexts (pp. 627–644). Transaction Publishers.
Shover, N., & Hochstetler, A. (2006). Choosing white-collar crime. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, M. W. (2010). Boston’s “big dig”: A socio-historical and political analysis of malfeasance and official deviance. National Social Science Journal, 34(2), 148–191.
Snow, D. A., Rochford, J. E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481.
Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (2001). Constructing social problems. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Sutherland, E. (1949/1983). White collar crime: The uncut version. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Teachout, Z. (2014). Corruption in America: From Benjamin Franklin's snuff box to citizens united. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual review of political science, 10, 211–244.
Von Alemann, U. (2004). The unknown a depths of political theory: The case for a multidimensional concept of corruption. Crime, law & social change, 42(1), 25–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ceresola, R.G. The U.S. Government’s framing of corruption: a content analysis of public integrity section reports, 1978–2013. Crime Law Soc Change 71, 47–65 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-018-9788-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-018-9788-5