Skip to main content
Log in

Foreign National Prisoners in Flanders (Belgium): Motivations and Barriers to Participation in Prison Programmes

  • Published:
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This exploratory study examines the experiences of foreign national prisoners and the motivations and barriers to their participation in prison programmes (e.g. educational courses, use of the prison library, prison work, sociocultural activities, sports). Data are derived from 15 individual interviews with foreign national prisoners in two Belgian prisons. During the interviews the strengths-based approach of Appreciative Inquiry was used. The results demonstrate that foreign national prisoners experience motivations and barriers that can be placed at the different levels of the ecological model of Bronfenbrenner (1979) which affect individual behaviour: micro-, meso-, exo- and macro-level. Foreign national prisoners were often motivated to participate in prison programmes to improve their health (micro-level) or to facilitate contact inside and outside prison (meso-level). The reverse was also possible; foreign national prisoners were limited in their participation in prison programmes by their social networks (meso-level) and a lack of knowledge and understanding of the available activities (exo-level). In conclusion, limitations, guidelines for further research and implications for practice and policy are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aebi, M. F., Tiago, M. M., & Burkhardt, C. (2016). SPACE I - Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2015. http://wp.unil.ch/space/files/2017/03/SPACE_I_2015_Report_170314.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2017.

  • Arditti, J. A. (2005). Families and incarceration: An ecological approach. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 86(2), 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atabay, T. (2009). Handbook on prisoners with special needs. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkan, M., Toprak, E., Kumtepe, A. T., Kumtepe, E. G., Ataizi, M., Pilanci, H., et al. (2011). Eliminating language barriers online at European prisons (ELBEP): A case-study. Educational Media International, 48(3), 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnoux, M., & Wood, J. (2013). The specific needs of foreign national prisoners and the threat to their mental health from being imprisoned in a foreign country. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 240–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batchelder, J. S., & Pippert, J. M. (2002). Hard Time or Idle Time: Factors Affecting Inmate Choices between Participation in Prison Work and Education Programs. The Prison Journal, 82(2), 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyens, K., Snacken, S., & Eliaerts, C. (1993). Cracking walls. Overcrowded prisons: size, causes and possible solutions. Interuniversitaire Reeks Criminologie en Strafwetenschappen. Antwerpen-Arnhem: Kluwer-Gouda [In Dutch].

  • Bhui, H. S. (2004). Going The Distance: Developing Effective Policy and Practice with Foreign National Prisoners. www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/going%20the%20distance%20-%20%20foreign%20national%20prisoners.pdf. Accessed 22 January 2017.

  • Bhui, H. S. (2009). Foreign National Prisoners: Issues and debates. In H. S. Bhui (Ed.), Race & Criminal Justice (pp. 154–169). London: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boothby, M. R. K. (2011). Insiders’ views of their role: Toward their training. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 53(4), 424–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. (2011). Deportation, detention and foreign-national prisoners in England and Wales. Citizenship Studies, 15(5), 583–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowe, C. (2011). Recent trends in UK prison libraries. Library Trends, 59(3), 427–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosens, D. (2013). Participation in prison programmes: Encouraging and discouraging factors. In P. Ponsaers, A. Crawford, J. D. de Maillard, J. Shapland, & A. Verhage (Eds.), Crime, violence, justice and social order: Monitoring contemporary security issues (pp. 275–298). Antwerpen: Maklu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosens, D., De Donder, L., Dury, S., Vanwing, T., & Verté, D. (2015a). Life long learning: The prison library as a bridge to participation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1496–1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosens, D., De Donder, L., Dury, S., & Verté, D. (2015b). Building a research Partnership in a Prison Context: From collaboration to co-construction. Sociological Research Online, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3693.

  • Brosens, D., De Donder, L., & Foriner Consortium. (2016). Educational participation of European citizens detained in a foreign European country. www.foriner.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Foriner-research-report.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2017.

  • Brosens, D., De Donder, L., Vanwing, T., Dury, S., & Verté, D. (2014). Lifelong learning programs in prison: Influence of social networks on participation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 518–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosens, D., De Donder, L., & Verté, D. (2013). Correctional Programmes in the Prison of Antwerp: A Research into the Needs of Prisoners. https://k00118.login.kanooh.be/sites/default/files/media/db_onderzoeksrapport_behoefteonderzoek_gevangenis_antwerpen.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2017 [In Dutch].

  • Carter, B. (2006). “One expertise among many”— Working appreciatively to make miracles instead of finding problems using appreciative inquiry as a way of reframing research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(1), 48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (2006). Recommendation Rec(2006)2 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the European Prison Rules. https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805d8d25. Accessed 25 January 2017.

  • Council of Europe (2012). Recommendation CM/Rec (2012)12 of the Committee of Ministers to member States concerning foreign prisoners. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:r3ymIY8GtA0J:pjp-eu.coe.int/documents/3983922/6970334/CMRec%2B%282012%29%2B12%2Bconcerning%2Bforeign%2Bprisoners.pdf/a13a6dc6facd4aaa9cc63bf875ac8b0f+&cd=1&hl=nl&ct=clnk&gl=be. Accessed 22 January 2017.

  • Coyle, A. (2009). A Human Rights Approach to Prison Management: Handbook for prison staff. London: International Centre for Prison Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devilly, G. J., Sorbello, L., Eccleston, L., & Ward, T. (2005). Prison-based peer-education schemes. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(2), 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, A., & Taylor, T. (2007). Sport and physical recreation in the settlement of immigrant youth. Leisure, 31(1), 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, K., Jacobson, J., & Biggar, K. (2011). Time Well Spent: A practical guide to active citizenship and volunteering in prison. https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/AbstractDB/AbstractDBDetails.aspx?id=260952. Accessed 22 December 2017.

  • Flemish Government. (2013). Decree on the Organisation of Care and Services for Prisoners (pp. 22457–22462). Bulletin of Acts, Orders and Decrees. www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/mopdf/2013/04/11_1.pdf#Page41. Accessed 12 January 2017 [In Dutch].

  • FOD Justice (2016). Annual report 2015. Directorate-general penitentiaries. http://justitie.belgium.be/sites/default/files/downloads/2016-06_epi_jaarverslag_2015_nl.pdf. Accessed 11 November 2016 [In Dutch].

  • Gallant, D., Sherry, E., & Nicholson, M. (2015). Recreation or rehabilitation? Managing sport for development programs with prison populations. Sport Management Review, 18(1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gostin, L. O., Vanchieri, C., & Pope, A. (2007). Ethical considerations for research involving prisoners. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyurcsik, N. C., Spink, K. S., Bray, S. R., Chad, K., & Kwan, M. (2006). An ecologically based examination of barriers to physical activity in students from grade seven through first-year university. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38(6), 704–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halimi, M., Brosens, D., De Donder, L., & Engels, N. (2017). Learning during imprisonment: Prisoners’ motives to educational participation within a remand prison in Belgium. The Journal of Correctional Education, 68(1), 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadi-Hanifi, K., Dagman, O., Peters, J., Snell, E., Tutton, C., & Wright, T. (2014). Engaging students and staff with educational development through appreciative inquiry. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(6), 584–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, R. H., & Clark, D. (2013). The effect of prison-based college education programs on recidivism: Propensity score matching approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(3), 196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. D. (1996). Prisoners’ rights to recreation: Quantity, quality, and other aspects. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(2), 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A., Elliott, C., & Arnold, H. (2001). Transforming the prison: Romantic optimism or appreciative realism? Criminology and Criminal Justice, 1(2), 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippens, V., Nuytiens, A., & Scheirs, V. (2009). Different profiles, different pains! Diversity and detention experience: need for a differentiated execution of sentences? In T. Daems, P. Pletincx, L. Robert, A. van de Wiel, & K. Verpoest (Eds.), Behind bars in Belgium (pp. 113–144). Ghent: Academia [In Dutch].

  • Lippke, R. L. (2003). Prisoner access to recreation, entertainment and diversion. Punishment & Society, 5(1), 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljødal, H. K., & Ra, E. (2011). Prison libraries the Scandinavian way: An overview of the development and operation of prison library services. Library Trends, 59(3), 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludema, J. D., Cooperrider, D. L., & Barrett, F. J. (2001). Appreciative inquiry: The power of the unconditional positive question. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 189–199). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manger, T., Eikeland, O., Diseth, Å., Hetland, H., & Asbjørnsen, A. (2010). Prison inmates’ educational motives: Are they pushed or pulled? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(6), 535–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meek, R., & Lewis, G. E. (2014). Promoting well-being and desistance through sport and physical activity: The opportunities and barriers experienced by women in English prisons. Women & Criminal Justice, 24(2), 151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C. L., Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Moore, K. E. (2014). Why Do Some Jail Inmates Not Engage in Treatment and Services? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(8), 914–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M., Specian, V. L., Tracy, N. C., & Demello, J. J. (2006). The effects of moderate physical activity on offenders in a rehabilitative program. Journal of Correctional Education, 57(4), 276–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyaupane, G. P., & Poudel, S. (2012). Application of appreciative inquiry in tourism research in rural communities. Tourism Management, 33(4), 978–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A., Meek, R., & Lewis, G. (2014). Sport in a youth prison: Male young offenders’ experiences of a sporting intervention. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(3), 381–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelissier, B. (2004). Gender differences in substance use treatment entry and retention among prisoners with substance use histories. American Journal of Public Health, 94(8), 1418–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G., Priede, C., Farrall, S., Shapland, J., & McNeill, F. (2012). Doing “strengths-based” research: Appreciative inquiry in a probation setting. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 13(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, P. J., Hiller, M. L., Webster, J. M., Staton, M., & Leukefeld, C. (2004). Treatment motivation and therapeutic engagement in prison-based substance use treatment. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 36(3), 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snacken, S. (2007). Belgium. In A. M. van Kalmthout, F. B. A. M. Hofstee-van der Meulen, & F. Dünkel (Eds.), Foreigners in European prisons (pp. 127–156). Nijmegen: Wolf Legal.

  • Spark, C., & Harris, A. (2005). Vocation, vocation: A study of prisoner education for women. Journal of Sociology, 41(2), 143–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugelvik, T. (2014). The incarceration of foreigners in European prisons. In S. Pickering & J. Ham (Eds.), The Routledge handbook on crime and international migration (pp. 107–120). London: Routledge.

  • United Nations. (1955). Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners. http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b36e8.html. Accessed 28 October 2015.

  • Vacca, J. S. (2004). Educated prisoners are less likely to return to prison. Journal of Correctional Education, 55(4), 297–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kalmthout, A. M., Hofstee-van der Meulen, F. B. A. M., & Dünkel, F. (2007). Comparative overview, conclusions and recommendations. In A. M. van Kalmthout, F. B. A. M. Hofstee-van der Meulen, & F. Dünkel (Eds.), Foreigners in European prisons (pp. 7–88). Nijmegen: Wolf Legal.

  • Westrheim, K., & Manger, T. (2013). Educational background, preferences and needs. A qualitative study of prisoners from Iraq, Poland, Russia, Serbia and Somalia. www.nordvux.net/portals/0/_dokumenter/2013/educational_background.pdf. Accessed 24 January 2017.

  • Westrheim, K., & Manger, T. (2014). Iraqi prisoners in Norway: Educational background, participation, preferences and barriers to education. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry, 1(1), 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz, C., & Bartlett, A. (2011). Language, foreign nationality and ethnicity in an English prison: Implications for the quality of health and social research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(10), 637–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of the respondents and the support of the coordinators of the prison activities, the activity providers and the prison guards within the prisons, without which this study could not have been completed.

Funding

The author(s) declared receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: This exploratory study is part of the research project FIP2 (Foreigners’ Involvement and Participation in Prison), which is funded by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO; Grant number: G026917N).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Flore Croux.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Croux, F., Brosens, D., Vandevelde, S. et al. Foreign National Prisoners in Flanders (Belgium): Motivations and Barriers to Participation in Prison Programmes. Eur J Crim Policy Res 25, 171–188 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-018-9372-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-018-9372-7

Keywords

Navigation